Frage von Pianist:
Fine reading s.alle good day!
For some weeks, I turn with the Ikegami Editcam HD, which is known to store their data directly in the Avid DNxHD codec as MXF and writes in organized bins. The copying of the Fieldpaks S-Ata-removable hard drives and opening the bins in an Avid project works great. Now my question: Sometimes it's possible that people I would like to copy selected material and they are in a form over to want it directly into their Avid can open. If there are only three or four minutes are synonymous'd fit on a DVD.
How should I proceed so that the people really synonymous open the data and can import? My idea was as follows: The selected material into a new timeline and cut that timeline in a virgin plate consolidate. Now I had tried, the accompanying Bin File (GCI) dazuzulegen, but the Avid Bin does not want to open and not import. Well, I was advised, instead, the PRJ file dazuzupacken, I have not tried yet. My fear: It will be all but a project Bins copied, so I then vast amounts of offline clips in the Project copied, right? The fact that the data on the target disk on the top level folder or MXF 1 must, of course, I am clear.
Preferably it would be really me, just the necessary clips and a bin to have, exactly as if I directly with the Editcam had rotated, but that does not seem to work, right?
Matthias
Antwort von sammy:
sorry I'm not a avid user and therefore can relate to your inquiry
nothing to say ...
However, a question: can the Ikegami save in different format
or what do you do with other solutions?
gruß cj
Antwort von Pianist:
However, a question: can the Ikegami save in different format
or what do you do with other solutions? The Ikegami Editcam HD-created exclusively DNxHD MXF files in the container with a data rate of 120 Mbit / s. You can in various HD formats, rotate, so 1080/50i, 720/50p, 1080/24p, but not in other codecs. Whether other NLE editing systems synonymous DNxHD files can read, I do not know, but it is quite synonymous to me no preference, because in the professional world is now Avid times the standard is and very few dissenters there.
Matthias
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) No preference quite synonymous, because in the professional world is now Avid times the standard is and very few dissenters there. (...) Ma again rausgehauen, wa?
Dat is nonsense. We have 2007 and not 1997.
Antwort von Pianist:
Ma again rausgehauen, wa?
Dat is nonsense. We have 2007 and not 1997. Then call me a German television station or a large production house, where there is no Avid. Final Cut Pro is only distributed on individual fighters.
Matthias
Antwort von PowerMac:
Avid there are everywhere. But the standard is therefore not yet. Many old Avid are still holding around, but they are hardly used anymore. Exception because the Ö.-R. But in the private sector sees it differently. Final Cut Pro and the rest are vsbei thousands s.Produktionsfirmen much represented.
The whole "lone" are available worldwide in more than the sum of Avid. The only time someone would have empirically investigated. Maybe you know just Avid friends and I meet only Final Cut Pro people ...
Theme change: what kind of lens did you s.deiner New? An old 2 / 3 "? Passt directly s.die Ikegami? Incl. Data? How is the picture? You notice a difference between SD and HD Lens?
Antwort von Pianist:
Theme change: what kind of lens did you s.deiner New? An old 2 / 3 "? Passt directly s.die Ikegami? Incl. Data? How is the picture? You notice a difference between SD and HD Lens? I forgot my ten years old Canon 15x8 (innenfokussiert, with extender) drangebaut what I previously s.der HC-390 had. At the ports but nothing has changed, which fits all. I will be even more times the aperture in the viewfinders briefly displayed synonymous me if this is not so important. What are the Resolutionund Sharpness: My SD-Lens s.der Editcam leads to better shots than one HD Lens s.einer Panasonic HDX-900. The full 1920x1080 raster brings out more than the HD-Camera Optics s.einer worse. If we compare a single recording of the HDX-900 reinschneidet, the total from mushy. Of course would certainly be with an HD-Optics or one-Optics Cinestyle still a little out of, but for 5 percent subjective improvement, I am now the time is not prepared to make substantial additional sum in an HD-Optics to invest. Others, who already work with this camera, incidentally, will see the same. Of course one has to have good optics, so it does not always work.
If you want to know exactly, yet a practical detail: At first it had surprised me that evening shots and open Aperture, the image center, which I've focused, although sharp, but objects on the same plane left out in the shot were a bit blurred. If I get a tick next turn towards infinity, but everything is completely sharp. In excellent viewfinders can be lucky just to see. Well, you just have the depth of field a little shift. Knowing this, one has no problems. You get with this camera exactly the way the recordings that you want. So far, I have a use rate of nearly 100 percent.
Matthias
Antwort von r.p. television:
Versteh now with the Foksuierung not exactly.
So as you describe it, the adjustment of the degree requirement of a tolerance or uncertainty. Or are you just my general edge blur ....? But yes, you can not usually just sharpen Rotate s.Fokusrad, rather dim.
Antwort von Pianist:
Versteh now with the Foksuierung not exactly. I do not synonymous, but it does not matter, because I know how I solve the problem ... :-)
The Auflagemaß, of course, is precisely adjusted. So now once more in detail: Imagine for example a very large buildings, we take a luxurious castle. As you stand of about 100 meters away. It is the blue hour, you're trying to open or almost open Aperture. You would focus exactly in the middle of a beautiful tower with a dome. Missing only the princess that has holiday. Now pull back on and you're almost at the beginning of focal length, or at least still in the area tend Short. You find that the center is very sharp, but the castle s.linken picture is slightly blurred. Now you move the focus ring a little bit towards the infinite - and now everything is sharp.
I have the following theory: either a slight aberration of the lens or simply the fact that the distance of the camera to the center of the castle is shorter than the Page of the castle. When 16:9 is the horizontal angle of view greater than 4:3, then 4:3 for the not so significant. So far, I always just left.
But as I said: This Viewfinder is extremely great, that one can assess everything and then can be directed.
Matthias
Antwort von r.p. television:
Synonymous think that it is different s.der away. Probably yes but some meters s.Bildrand represent.
To this fact I have never thought of. Is it because times ensured. For SD times was so synonymous's not worth mentioning.
Antwort von Pianist:
For SD times was so synonymous's not worth mentioning. Well, we must also always remember that each and every little mistake is not sufficient precision much more visible than before. I shall put it in one sentence: Those who always has clean rotated, with HD will have no problems. But who ever geschludert, which is HD with despair.
Matthias (schludert not)
Antwort von r.p. television:
Unfortunately, not only the talents of many, but some lovely synonymous entlarvt HD technical shortcomings, with whom None reckoned with.
My technician, a year ago some good SD Lenses for its HD capability and durchgemessen for good.
Now he has two of them back out because he had noted that the Auflagemaß set was not optimal. Between high and low focal there were always a focus shift, synonymous with painstaking attitude.
So hinzoomen, focus and raise it no more, because the subject is slightly out of the focus is running.
An SD-times unnoticed tolerance.
Hence my suspicion synonymous with the Auflagemaß.
As you write you, the edge blur just to the left, I could synonymous imagine that an image synonymous error reinforces the effect.
Antwort von Pianist:
Between high and low focal there were always a focus shift, synonymous with painstaking attitude.
So hinzoomen, focus and raise it no more, because the subject is slightly out of the focus is running. Yes, of which I have already heard synonymous. And even with HD lenses. Luckily for me is not the case.
Did someone actually now what about my original question? :-)
Matthias
