Frage von Rorinator:
Good morning =).
Times I need your help. And I have here an ancient camcorder receive a gift, the toll ansich correctly and professionally is (synonymous with focus ring, etc.), but the picture via S-Video s.Computer very noisy, so I prefer to leave. That you know the name: SonyHandycam Hi8 - CCD-TR805E
Instead I look for a beginner camcorder, which is a fairly good SD picture and has the video footage if possible, you simply and with very good quality s.den PC can send. (If any MiniDV camcorder, or?)
Furthermore, it would be important to me that the Cam s.sich very quietly, so no drive noise. If there is any, would be an external microphone port spitze.
It would be for future projects synonymous advantageous if it indoors, at least not very noisy images and still attractive returns. Oh, and a manual focus would be synonymous very good.
Other gadgets such as camera light, remote control, etc. anbringbare Lenses I'm not interested. Actually, I want a camcorder that will simply make good pictures.
Main problem is, however, the Money. As a student I can not very much hergeben. 300-400 euro would be the highest of all what I could ever pay rather less.
How is this cam, for example:
http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0012XWR6O/producto13-21/ref=nosim
Have they told me yesterday at Media Markt viewed and found it pretty good. But I would like your expert opinion heard .. ^ ^
The synonymous I found to be quite so good: http://www.amazon.de/Panasonic-NV-GS90EG-S-DVC-Camcorders-silber/dp/tech-data/B0012RQFTA/ref=de_a_smtd
So the following question: Would I in the price segment Einsteigercam a good place? How good is the proposed of me? And it would be wiser to my ancient camcorder afloat again, because he has a better quality?
Hope you can answer me .. ^ ^
Antwort von Markus:
[ccd-tr805e] ... but the picture via S-Video s.Computer very noisy ... Let me guess: That was the evening indoors in low light, right?
With such a situation all camcorders have more or less of a problem - depending of the size of the optics and the image converter, so depending on the purchase price of the respective recording device.
The bad news is that the weak light of modern reserves camcorder through the rigor of the manufacturer (most users want cheap camcorder) tend to be even more next has worsened. For example, optics and image converter and getting smaller all to abound more and more sensor points to the tiny space packed what shots in low light is also counter-productive.
But only so that it may be the usual problem of analog video over existing connections s.PC 'concerns: How does the picture of the TR805 in the same light conditions s.Television from?
Related topics:
"
Video recordings s.Computermonitor not look good " 1st
FireWire FAQ">(c) capturing by means of graphics card, TV card or Videograbber?
Antwort von Rorinator:
First, thanks for the reply =).
Partially true, so it was dark. The recording was at maximum light in my room done, which was 2 desk lamps, a ceiling floodlights and the normal ceiling lamp. Nevertheless, the room was quite noisy. Even my digital camera (DX6490) has had a similar quality.
Images in daylight looked sharper and prettier out s.pc but they were slightly blurry. I transferred the film with a USB converter of Hauppauge.
In addition, it is very dusty - Behind the Lens and particularly the viewfinders are a few particles to be seen. I trust myself not to drop the camcorder apart assemble, and durchzureinigen back together, if they are synonymous then certainly would work better.
I've got me on some youtube videos and slide viewed now but probably in the slightly more expensive price segment. Especially I was amazed of the quality of the HDR-HC5 (500 ¬, my dream), and the NV-GS 230 (With luck 300 ¬).
Antwort von Markus:
... and now it probably slip into something more expensive price segment. The choice of the camcorder to the needs and to go to the budget if necessary to rethink, rather than an unrealizable ideal nachzujagen do just a few. :-)
Especially I was amazed of the quality of the HDR-HC5 (500 ¬, my dream), and the NV-GS 230 (With luck 300 ¬). I can be on both camcorders are not really say much, but with the keywords "HC5" and "GS230" here you will find countless threads, where the two models were discussed. Maybe even before that it would be good if you on the issue thoughtfully, whether in standard resolution to be filmed or whether it should be high resolution / needs.
Antwort von Aljoscha.Niko:
... instead of an unrealizable ideal nachzujagen, ...:-) ... like me. But the difference: I've done and soon possibly a SonyVX2000, my eternal desire. :-)
... and the NV-GS 230 (With luck 300 ¬). I had last one 230er. Have they recently for 250, - which, because I use the money needed for the VX2000 ... :-) Test shots but I had made it safely stored on the PC and even uploaded a test recording in 4:3:
http://rapidshare.com/files/127837864/gs230.rar.html
The same game, there's obviously synonymous in 16:9:
http://rapidshare.com/files/127837866/gs230_16-9.rar.html
The only times so you get a picture of the quality out of them, of which, incidentally, I was excited because I had prior SonyHC14 whose picture is much worse than that of the GS230. ;)
Antwort von Rorinator:
That the 230 makes great pictures I've seen. Incidentally, I was the one with the Wii Aljoscha;).
Markus: whether SD or HD, I reletiv no preference because my films I always eh either burn VideoCD or upload to Youtube. I just want good image quality, which my ancient camcorder supports synonymous yes - only the dubbing is too uncertain, so I do not take the risk and start a "right" pick.
As I said, either the Gs230, or HDRHC5. Yes I've still got time with the savings ... am just 18 * G *.
