Frage von Cocoa_Magazin:
I wanted you s.meinem times dispute with the press office of Canon can participate. It is a question that I wrote, I would opt NTSC/24p free. Had a lovely synonymous test report. First came trivial answers, until I wrote that I would publish everything s.sofort. Now the following:
+ + + +
"Good day Mr. Pilipp,
Thank you very much for the positive assessment of a product from our home.
It is not least a positive, neutral body of reporting from coming to the big success with our Pordukte contribute.
Please understand that we are for this reason, the Code of ethics of the journalists following no fees or concessions of other kinds of traditional coverage. This is not least to ensure the credibility of these reports are not vulnerable to what is ultimately synonymous in the interest of the editor is.
In the case of a commissioned work for an advertorial for example, must be a reward in writing in advance of us will be charged.
We appreciate your understanding, hope to continue and remain sympathetic reporting
With kind regards
xxx (Canon Press)
+ + +
I Darufhin:
"It is not a fee, but it is that you have the 24frame mode can test."
You can be happy synonymous times s.die lady for me and write requests :-)))) haha :-))
__________________
Michael Pilipp
www.high-definition-television.de
info@cocoa.de
Antwort von Stegmaier:
Weird of Canon, I've had the Porsche 959er from Karajan want to test for a positive report in the car image and can still drive him today.
Antwort von Stegmaier:
It is a question that I wrote, I would opt NTSC/24p free. Had a lovely synonymous test report. First came trivial answers, until I wrote that I would publish everything s.sofort. As you yourself write: You want to opt
for free and would have (it?) A
lovely synonymous test report.
Now, not as you want and promt you threaten with consequences ( "Publication"). So a kind of extortion attempt.
These and similar attitudes, I have over the years, more than once for journalists and those who are considered experienced. And have just acted like Canon.
Bravo Canon!
Antwort von Stefan:
Canon rulez!
Good luck
The thick Stefan
Antwort von Jörg:
to this reaction can only congratulate Canon. The two Ladies
of the press department are synonymous in other cases so sure in the reaction.
A better way, always emerging the rumors of "bribing journalists willing" or bribery Prepare Companies "
to rebut, I can not imagine.
well done, Canon
Antwort von Cocoa_Magazin:
Now, I accept your opinion of course. But does the thing but a little different! I would opt not as a reward, but the 24P mode to test (in particular, whether the result of Adobe can be read !!!).
The test report has a lot of work done. The page is completely free and without advertising revenue (which is a Private Page). So I have nothing of it. The HXA1 is simply a very good camera, what I wanted the others.
How much is the Canon? Nothing! I want to but no camera! I will not be a next MENU EXTENSION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I suspect that the whole just does not work. Also in other journals, you can test you nothing about the switch to read.
Antwort von Gast1:
... I would opt not as a reward, but the 24P mode to test (in particular, whether the result of Adobe can be read !!!)... Then you have at least very misleading way.
And the "threat" because of my publication is clear.
The contribution "Bravo Canon" next up is actually of me.
Antwort von Cocoa_Magazin:
Well maybe I was wrong and yes synonymous am unjust. Maybe. That is why I am so over the reactions.
In spite of everything ... :-) 24p would gladly give it a try.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
I want to unlock is a private ... Page Canon probably gets every day, after several such claims of self-gifts "journalists". On the absolutely correct answer to the Canon Pressestelle unprofessional on your approach, I can not in any event, something to laugh a little to find wines. And I say this with twelve years experience as a newspaper journalist on the hump.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Cocoa_Magazin:
I am neither a journalist nor unprofessional self. Your answer is there. Would you believe the article once viewed, you knew das Also I have a big article in a magazine published! Even the Canon I originally wanted to test s.Schiele & Schön pass on what I now of course no longer do.
It began the whole way, so that I am a tester asked what I was not there! I understand of course, bought the device and asked after one month again - and then due to the updates. And here it is - as already written umpteen times - only a Menuerweiterung!
The reference to Canon with the publication was synonymous not only blackmail but fair! I could synonymous correspondence previously published, which I obviously do not!
Criticism is good and desirable, but please do not be insulting! Thanks!
Antwort von Stefan:
Prior: I am with the XH A1 is not sufficient.
Can it be that Canon is not aware of this mode on the camera and has eg for reasons of policy model synonymous not want the camera mode to "free" will?
Can it be that it is technically not possible to unlock this mode? How are you on the idea that there is an activation? Canon offers such a service officially?
What would it bring to your readers, if your camera would be released, but Canon only makes for you, and no third chance to opt to acquire?
Even the Canon I originally wanted to test s.Schiele & Schön pass on what I now of course no longer do. Bad loser or insulted liverwurst ;-)
Good luck
The thick Stefan
Antwort von Stegmaier:
The Canon activation usually costs 500 ¬ and which he probably wanted to just save money.
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) Also I have a big article in a magazine published! (...) Bravo. Thus you have really done it now!
Antwort von Cocoa_Magazin:
Bad loser or insulted liverwurst ;-)
Good luck
Yes, I'm really offended :-) why should I in these circumstances still free to publish reports in scientific journals? Would you not synonymous, or :-)
Antwort von Bernd E.:
I am neither a journalist nor unprofessional self. Since I do not personally know, I have my formulations to create what you want here in the imprint or write your homepage. At both places you lift that it is a pure private property and is not commercially. That means in normal language use, it is a hobby. And no manufacturer will provide monetary benefits in the value of several hundred dollars is available.
Promising, it would possibly have been, until the search request from a recognized professional journal to be issued and with such backing them then Canon.
Criticism is good and desirable, but please do not be offensive An insult can I find in my notes are still nowhere, it was intended anyway.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Noah:
Since I do not personally know, I have my formulations to create what you want here in the imprint or write your homepage. At both places you lift that it is a pure private property and is not commercially. That means in normal language use, it is a hobby. And no manufacturer will provide monetary benefits in the value of several hundred dollars is available.
Promising, it would possibly have been, until the search request from a recognized professional journal to be issued and with such backing them then Canon.
In times of network is the separation between amateur / professional journalism is no longer sooo clear: it is certainly possible without a professional webpage, or for a magazine to write in a field a network of magazines operate on its territory that an authority is Reviews regularly represents high, many readers and therefore has absolutely Review copies can request - whether it is synonymous synonymous gets, but this is entirely at the discretion of the respective manufacturer. There are many black sheep (as is always nice to tomshardware documented) and many good sites with sound journalistic product testing each authorization equivalent with specialized magazines to be treated, if they are synonymous only "hobby" (a boundary by the simple switching of Google ads or affiliate programs, but is synonymous blurred - I'm with ad revenues of 400, 800, 1200 euros "Hobbyist"?)
Noah
Antwort von Gast1:
Well maybe I was wrong and yes synonymous am unjust. Maybe. That is why I am so over the reactions.
In spite of everything ... :-) 24p would gladly give it a try. What should he do
now? Or even self Harakiri?
Antwort von Stefan:
Bad loser or insulted liverwurst ;-)
Good luck
Yes, I'm really offended :-) why should I in these circumstances still free to publish reports in scientific journals? Would you not synonymous, or :-) Why must it absolutely free?
You're here in my view, wrong on the "Trip". Good work is well paid synonymous. The publisher lowers price of books, even if you free s.gibst article. Others say, "What koscht nothing is worth nothing."
And if you have to work according to pay, it will allow you to synonymous devices (or tags) are, with whom you want to work out.
ADD: What would I do? I would not in any event, my previous work as a defiant child throw into the fire, just because I do not get lollipops have. I would think about how I still come to my goal.
Good luck
The thick Stefan
Antwort von pyjama:
Please go, `werd grown and spare us until then with your" bought "test report in large newspapers.
there is now synonymous to one another and test reports in magazines like this with such small requirements ;-) "video active."
bub, `Go home cry * * kopfschüttel
