Frage von sammy:
Hello,
I would like to see for professional video creation and
Live streaming over the Internet right hardware.
Of course, I would like the best possible quality at the best
price. ;-)
Since I am now more or less just a layman in this area
am, I would be interested to know whether someone has an idea how to
the reality may be.
1. Possibility: camcorder on grabber card s.den PC
2. Possibility: camcorder directly via USB or Firewire s.den PC
3. Possibility: webcam via USB or Firewire (if it is Firewire webcams)
How many pixels are necessary or good?
Does it matter which format? MiniDV, DV or HDV?
Better to use a webcam? Via USB or Firewire?
A general question is whether it is better to have a webcam
use, which runs via USB, such as the Microsoft LifeCam NX-6000 which makes the cost of 80 ¬.
Microsoft says that the webcam 1600 x 1190 pixels provides, ie 1,904,000 pixels. This would be a lot more than a current MiniDV camcorder.
But the question is synonymous to whether the transfer will not be on the USB connection hangs because it can transmit garnicht as much as
The webcam provides. And it is for this reason it would be better, a
Camcorder with fewer pixels to use, but which, however, "all" properly transmitted.
Here are two of my favorite camcorder:
JVC GY-DV 301 E (3,750.00 euros, more than 80 for the webcam)
The GY-DV301 combines in an ideal manner, the functionality of an excellent camcorder with the possibilities of the Internet. Professional DV camcorder as he uses all the benefits of global IT standards and delivers, thanks to the 3 CCD technology is an excellent image quality. The generation of MPEG4 streams was until now only with a long and complex computer computing technology, the GY-DV300 equipped with the optional KA-DV300 adapter delivers streaming MPEG4 streams in real time. A simultaneous recording on DV tape is of course also possible. When connecting peripherals s.externe, the GY-DV301 on established standards. My Note: So this would be 3 x 440,000 pixels,
So 1,320,000 pixels, which would still be less than the webcam of Microsoft. BUT: I can compare it?
Canon HV 10 730 euro
This camcorder has over 2.000.000 pixels. Would be with the with
most of all. But he would be synonymous, in conjunction with the
Live streaming of the best?
Would be glad if someone such thing has ever been solved
and me a few tips can give.
Greetings and Thanks
Sammy
Antwort von AndyZZ:
Nu tell me what you really want and what.
Live streaming with the JVC or the Canon? Or for your professional video creation excuse?
What do you want to stream?
Do you have your times to identify what data rates because you give? How do you want without the exorbitant Compression upload? Who will watch?
Antwort von sammy:
Hi Andy,
thank you for your message.
It is a medical project.
It should, for example, diseases concerning
Internet diagnosed (in Germany
currently prohibited). This is
obviously necessary, so that the images in exacting detail
be transferred as possible.
Hm, that with the compression, I had forgotten.
Compacts as a webcam car?
The easiest way would be to the best webcam
currently on the market, so the NX-6000
of Microsoft to use, as these prices and
synonymous probably the best quality streams
will deliver. What do you mean?
I am looking forward to your message.
Gruss
Sammy
