Frage von tomk:
Moin, moin
I use the time after a GS11 (broken) a GS60, but at least the evening is totally useless.
Important
--------
Indoor shots, synonymous evening
Children playing outside, (small shutter)
Wide inside recordings Anglefür
Processible with Magix Video (Avi, DV preferred)
Integrated lens cover would be nice
If possible tape, because I> 20 tapes umkopieren needs and wants to sell the GS60
unimportant
-----------
Still Image
External Micro, video lights
HD (72cm Television only had for about 2-3 years no TFT planned)
External accessories, e1-2 original batteries are more to me right.
Found
-----------
After several searches and test reports and data sheets have their place, the usual suspects, including
http://forum.slashcam.de/sony-dcr-dvd506e-vs-sony-dcr-hc96e-vs-panasonic-nv-gs320eg-vt53204.html?start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight =
Hc96: larger sensor, more weitwinkel
GS320: 3 chip. Advantage?
Ask
-------
What is it with noise behavior in spaces evening (low light, artificial light) from? Did someone experience, the test show Lowlight (too dark) or daylight?
Alternatives in HD, otherwise due in 3 years?
Anybody know any good dealer in Hamburg for camcorder?
Meadow Haven? 1000 pots? I know from my Fotografiererei.
Thank you for your help
Grüße aus HH
Tom
Antwort von Markus73:
What is it with noise behavior in spaces evening (low light, artificial light) from? Did someone experience, the test show Lowlight (too dark) or daylight? Hello,
without such a device ever used to have, but all direct comparisons, of which I have read so far, certify the HC96 a slightly better Lowlight behavior.
Gruß,
Markus
Antwort von tomk:
Moin, moin
thank you for your efforts Mark.
That is my problem:
In Lowlight test at the Sony seems to be better, but what is with indoor (no NightShot mode, just less light than daylight)?
Greetings from Hamburg
Tom
Antwort von Jan:
Nonsense HC 96 is not better, unless you use NightShot:
Videoaktiv HC 96 Test pictures Video Active GS 320 test pictures VG
Jan
Antwort von Markus73:
Nonsense HC 96 is not better, unless you use NightShot:
Videoaktiv HC 96 Test pictures
Video Active GS 320 test pictures
Hm, I have a split-screen comparison of the two video here (http://www.pana3ccduser.com/ of dates, but there probably is no longer available), recorded in the building interior, in order to compare the Lowlightverhalten. Unfortunately, too large, to say somewhere quickly cease.
In summary, I would say:
The GS320 has better colors, the HC96 produced in bad light and a brighter picture with less noise than the GS320.
Gruß,
Markus
Addition: I've found yet and I must correct: compare the GS300 and the HC96.
Here's the link:
http://www.pana3ccduser.com/showthread.php? T = 8382 & highlight = hc96
(Panasonic is left, right in the Sony Picture).
Antwort von Jan:
I can only video download - which I can not run.
Since the forum is a Panasonic, I would strongly doubt whether the user then the Sony Color Slow Shutter function and long exposure really know, and 90% did not know what there was not set.
Sonyhat a small advantage, long exposure to the Camera On and synonymous takes a 1 / 25 sec, which is a Panasonic GS can not do - all starting at only 1 / 50 sec!. Now is the long exposure Factory already asked to be on. With less movement you see is not what is the visual of the Picture Page and is brighter than one with a 1 / 50 sec.
You can only convince myself, if the correct forum with exposure data that shows when playing data can be obtained from both cameras to see what shutter was taken.
Since the VAD in Picture - no private users as Pana 3CCD - not synonymous brighter, yes Pana roars a little more, but much better and brighter colors, which comes closer to my thesis. At the larger movement is 1 / 25 sec the HC 96 is lighter but unfortunately synonymous been unable to move - what man in a test image, unfortunately, does not see.
Times the shutter a few times of the current SR 7:
Slow Shutter on - 1 / 25 sec-1 / 215 sec
Slow shutter off - 1 / 50 sec - 1 / 215 sec
Color Slow Shutter on 1 / 2 sec-1 / 215 sec
Smooth Slow Record - 1 / 200 sec -1/800 sec
VG
Jan
Antwort von tomk:
Moin, moin
Thank you for your efforts.
The test video (if synonymous with GS300 included) actually speaks well for the Sony (interior)
Fast Focus accurate in light bills, better white balance, a little less noise.
In daylight, the colors in the GS320 to the images of the VA better.
Hmm.
I need probably one GS320HC96 :-)
Another question:
Since I am neither stupid nor geizgeil am:
Dear Friend dealer in Hamburg?
Greetings from Hamburg and thanks again
Tom
Antwort von Jan:
Since I just have lived in Hamburg, I can not recommend.
VG
Jan
Antwort von tomk:
Moin, moin
again thank you very much s.alle.
Score
It is a Panasonic GS320 EGS has become.
The reason was usmein better third, purely subjective:
GS320 is better in the hand.
"I do not thrill to the TFT around." Touch Screen at Cam, no thanks.
With the first test shots indoor, evening, I am very satisfied.
The Image Stabilization works great. The brightness adjustment for some fast pans (Window -> room) could be quicker, but is acceptable.
Regards
Tom
