Frage von Kakadoo:
Hello,
can anyone recommend me a camera? I have a digital, with which I am not satisfied. Now I might have an analogous, since Resolutionstört me the pixel. Is it for this analog cameras e'e possible, scan the video into the PC to edit the film? Some with a special recorder?
Antwort von Bernd E.:
You can do almost anything if the money does not matter. That just your material costs are higher order multiples, if you turn on film, you will be aware. Since you're probably better off if you invest a fraction of that money into an ordinary digital camcorder. What exactly bothers you because s.der "pixel resolution"?
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Markus:
= Exposure of a chemical film camera
= Analog video camera recording on magnetic tape
Are you really a movie camera?
Antwort von PowerMac:
Ouch ...!
Antwort von Frank965:
Yes I'm looking for a real movie camera. But I do not know how much is such a thing. Perhaps doing it synonymous with a normal video camera VHS tape. I am bothered s.den pixels that in high-density Strucktur everything is pretty blurry (I have a Panasonic NV-GS 35, 8 megapixels).
Antwort von Frank965:
like - what now?.
You disturb the "pixel structure" of your digital and want back to the Stone Age with a "normal video camera with VHS tape. Since you will upset a lot more, such as the lousy picture quality
Or now, but a Super8 or 16mm film camera?
Greeting
Alpine molch
Antwort von Bernd E.:
From a camera this size and price range, although one must not expect miracles, but she has made in the tests a very good figure, it should be less s.der camera when the images are blurred (as I interpret) your error description. Significantly better than on a VHS tape have made it all! Moreover, it should be synonymous for Panasonic scratch that the GS will have 35 eight-megapixel. Where did you get this statement come from?
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hey,
that the NV-GS is supposed to have 35 8 megapixels, which I know nothing;)
But before you throw away it, you give me! We can exchange may indeed against VHS NV-GS 35?
Regards
Constantin
Antwort von PowerMac:
like - what now?.
You disturb the "pixel structure" of your digital and want back to the Stone Age with a "normal video camera with VHS tape. Since you will upset a lot more, such as the lousy picture quality
Or now, but a Super8 or 16mm film camera?
Greeting
Alpine molch Sorry if totally wrong, but that posting ...
* plonk *
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Hello Kakadoo.
I fear that you yourself have to come to terms with the rough video resolution. Of course you can you buy a 16mm camera
(out of 200 ¬ -130,000 ¬, often synonymous beyond, depending on the configuration and properties. It is of lenses erstmal no question!), But your reasons for doing this are dubious. And if you
(on the market for such devices, once
you look around
and synonymous little closer so are preoccupied) synonymous You'll realize pretty quickly why.
In general, I think it is commendable, if one wants to deal with film technology. However, this is a league in which s.Kenntnissen a considerable degree, the prerequisite for working with this medium is
(in fact synonymous with video, but there it does (thank God AND unfortunately) does not hurt so much when making false). Generally, I can tell you this: If you are with a fully manual camera Small-NOT technically sound negative
(and is artistically staged another bookcase can
create), you should erstmal film cameras to take a bow.
www.filmtechnik-online.de contains much worth knowing
(synonymous for video) about film technique. Details of footage you get from Fuji or Kodak. The processes and opportunities in post-production work you can copy to describe people
(if they have time). It is synonymous for nearly every aspect of film, lighting and photographic technology a lot of good
(but much synonymous inadequate and misleading literature). Otherwise, you only really busy time with Super8. Inform yourself as synonymous, but in advance, with what model you can still work today
(Batteries are still available for the light meter, or even prohibited, you can with the new S8-film types, and their sensitivities (64T-reverse, 250-500ASA negative .. . Vision2 film after all) yet, the camera IS S8 any one, or a useless N8/Doppel8 or whatever). I've seen
(purely cinematic) works amazingly well on Super8 in 35mm Blowup, of course, relative. Since so many of the derisive laughter would pass through the laces cinema!
Antwort von Rolf Grindel:
Yes I'm looking for a real movie camera. But I do not know how much is such a thing. Perhaps doing it synonymous with a normal video camera VHS tape. I am bothered s.den pixels that in high-density Strucktur everything is pretty blurry (I have a Panasonic NV-GS 35, 8 megapixels). It is remarkable, with what seriousness is in response to such dubious posts like this. It is hardly possible to formulate more rubbish in a statement that soon - or is it about the sender to try to accept how much rubbish the readers. A film camera because of the pixels in high-density structure at 8 megapixels, but do with VHS tapes tray - gehts noch?
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Sure, it might be a troll. On the other hand I have met so many troubled people who had such issues on his mind. So I jumped at times on it ...
... and even supplements that video a Closeup is medium. Many bring the objects in the picture is not an adequate size for video and television, and complain afterwards about the low Resolutionvon video. Wrong track!
