Frage von Blackeagle123:
Hey,
have a Panasonic NV-MX300 Camera, because the stabilizer works great wenns synonymous (always called panasonic had such a bad stabilizers).
But if I pop back, for example, when the bride enters at a wedding in the church or when I do field recordings of a person running, jerky, the picture simply too much.
I have experienced in Meier internship period at the ZDF that "Tripods are" off with a kind of ball down, the good vibrations derive their weight and the camera can be kept much quieter. Unfortunately, I do not know how the Tripods hot and where can I buy them! Vielleciht can you help me, or another way to call, it would be synonymous with the walk. (For a vest hanging s.der the camera, I have found me), but too expensive viiiiel
-Schonmal Thanks!
Greeting
Constantin
Antwort von Peter S.:
This is called a Steadycam. There are some instructions selberbauen the net. With Aunt Google you can find them ...
MFG Peter
Antwort von rush:
jipp times in the forum here, or just browse .. There's already some entries synonymous to ...
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hey, thanks! Would then seek times * g *
Antwort von Markus:
Searching ... Perhaps with the right search term: Stead
i cam Superbrains * * ;-)
Antwort von chrisgau:
But if I pop back, for example, when the bride enters at a wedding in the church or when I do field recordings of a person running, jerky, the picture simply too much. My tip, if the correct steady-solution is too expensive (which is very often the case).
1. Wide-angle Converter
2. Monopod Tripod (eg Manfrotto 434B) + ball joint attachment (eg Manfrotto 210B)
The wide-converter is in my opinion anyway ALWAYS duty, because there is hardly a DV camera Optics brings a reasonable wide angle (lower limit usually with 45-50mm). The Monopod Tripod anyway you'll get not only a very useful tool, but in the folded state synonymous a good counterweight. Now that you screwed with the ball joint s.der Camera and the construction will sums to below the ball, thus stabilizing the camera motion clearly. The ball joint, you can fine-tune the balance. Of course, the whole can not be with a professional Steadycam-match method, but is cheaper to deploy more flexible and much easier to transport.
Regards,
chrisgau
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
The wide-converter is in my opinion anyway ALWAYS duty, because there is hardly a DV camera Optics brings a reasonable wide angle (lower limit usually with 45-50mm). The Monopod Tripod anyway you'll get not only a very useful tool, but in the folded state synonymous a good counterweight. Now that you screwed with the ball joint s.der Camera and the construction will sums to below the ball, thus stabilizing the camera motion clearly. The ball joint, you can fine-tune the balance. Of course, the whole can not be with a professional Steadycam-match method, but is cheaper to deploy more flexible and much easier to transport. Hello!
So now I build my own together a Steadicam, and after applying the instructions of Hobbythek! But it would change a lot. I have a monopod! Even a very good one. But this is not simply what I would like to have: - /
I let his Tripod Tripod Steadicam and Steadicam let me be. Nevertheless, thanks for the suggestion!
With the wide angle thing and the little camcorders I basically agrees with you! But the Panasonic NV-MX300 has a 58mm wide-angle! (min. 2.9 mm)
So I'm happy synonymous with no device. Perhaps I lay me someday, when I was special movies, but right now I do not need!
Viele liebe Grüße
Constantin
Antwort von chrisgau:
With the wide angle thing and the little camcorders I basically agrees with you! But the Panasonic NV-MX300 has a 58mm wide-angle! (min. 2.9 mm) Hmm ... 58mm is not exactly what I would understand in Wide Angle, but if you're satisfied it's okay.
Regards,
chrisgau
