Frage von abcHD:
Hi, I wondered where to current HDV or AVCHD camcorder in Comparison to the cameras to the zb television can be used to see. The current films with much better cameras will be rotated is obvious to me but can such a man with a camcorder image quality as the television was shown before the high definition format has been introduced?
Of course, the so-called "film-look" synonymous or mainly of the right lighting, etc. But my question is whether one with a current HD camcorder (around ¬ 1000), at least in theory, an equally good or better picture can absorb as Film cameras are still not have HD support.
In other words synonymous, one could ask: "Would a director who is the best possible picture quality will tend to draw an older camera (one of those expensive film cameras for more than one ¬ 10,000 but not HD) or an HD camcorder currently available from the Consumer area? "
I hope you understand what I mean.
mfg Chris
Antwort von tommyb:
You can now take HD cameras (HDV synonymous) and Derren runterskalieren images to SD resolution. What then shall we have quite good quality (of course only if the scale is high).
Often enough done with HDV 1080i recordings to which I have copied Digibeta (via component). Could smooth would say the whole of the Digibeta (metrologically certainly widersprechbar, purely optical, but barely).
The biggest problem you have when it comes to screen design. Depth, colors, everything is the film look and all you get when s.besten with film cameras for a number of 10,000 euros will be rotated.
Antwort von WoWu:
Hello Chris,
You in your thread is equal to several questions, the ways are to be answered.
Once you ask whether you will see a difference, but then you ask:
"If a director, merely the best possible picture quality will tend to draw an older camera (one of those expensive film cameras for more than one ¬ 10,000 but not HD) or a current HD camcorder in the consumer area?" The second question will probably soon PowerMac Report and many good (and certainly synonymous correct) arguments as to why a director on one or the other feature of a professional camera can not do without.
Axel will surely become known, and you say that it did not arrive at the camera, but only on the artistic content of the image.
All this is not your first question.
So let me post my times are limited to the question of whether you see a difference ...
Unfortunately, I must tell you "it's always important to ..." namely that, where you view the Picture.
The analogue television has only 373 lines x 364 horizontal pixels transferred, as some 140,000 pixels. Television can do, since it is transmitted digitally, even slightly better, but still not great, because the limiting parameters of the analog TV have been accepted in both the transmitter as synonymous in the Home Circuit (TV).
Therefore, it is not so difficult to make such a quality with no really big effort and if you do not make really big mistakes, or how tommyb quite correctly wrote bad software used to reach.
It is different even if the comparisons to high-quality monitors outside the SD synonymous with more than 7.4 MHz may be, because as far as SD would be really rich. (SD-TV, unfortunately, not)
Then the story looks quite different, because SD cameras (and the synonymous optics) to deal with quite synonymous, that the SD transmission route stops at 5 MHz and no real effort to give a lot to be better.
HD, however, goes up to 30 MHz. Especially the synonymous Lenses are designed for such a presentation designed and are in the range of 7 MHz (possible SD quality) is still fairly linear and of excellent quality.
So, you see, then, SD of HD is coming on good monitors really better on CRT monitors and hard to be perceived better on an SD transmission route, you'll see no difference and certainly not on analogue transmissions.
Some can still be fooled, because the DG-Picture is a bit richer in contrast. The difference disappears immediately when the gamma values of the different formats converge.
All this applies only if no downscaling error has occurred, because the interpolation of pixels is just not done so times and requires a good software or hardware required.
