Frage von thomas_b:
Hi,
we read quite a lot and synonymous I vacillate between the two models currently ..
Are there reviews of users of GH2?
What would interest me, handling, quality difference between the two codecs, pro-and cons to both cameras.
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hey,
I asked here recently a very similar question, which concerned additionally to the 7D. Really detailed reports on GH-2, I do not get there. Am therefore very interested to s.Berichten synonymous GH-2, synonymous when I'll probably stick with my decision to 60D. ;-)
Greetings!
Antwort von pilskopf:
What do you want?
In comparison, the test loses 60D.
Antwort von thomas_b:
Hi ..
Where's the (type) Comparison Test?
What is the handling of GH2? I have a G1 and when I look at the dimensions should have the GH2 quite a bit smaller than the 60D.
The question of accessories I find interesting synonymous. The Lumix G lenses are a bit narrower than the UDN of Canon Nikon's for GH2 also the option of a follow focus, etc.?
Antwort von pailes:
The follow-focus you set a rule not s.Deine m4/3-Lenses but s.adaptierte lenses.
GH2 <-> 60D Comparison Test:
http://www.eoshd.com/content/460- Canon 60D-vs-Panasonic-GH2-Full Review-Part-1
Antwort von DSLR-Freak:
GH2 <-> 60D Comparison Test:
http://www.eoshd.com/content/460- Canon 60D-vs-Panasonic-GH2-Full Review-Part-1 This is really an interesting test ... and in his statements sometimes very misleading!
The GH2 seems to be superior with respect to video in most respects. But the author is really completely obsessed in his argument. In particular, in his latest article on the 60D, he makes this clear:
http://www.eoshd.com/content/475-Shooting-with-the- Canon 60D
Here it is:
"This isn'ta review Which sets out to bash the 60D for the sake of hyping the GH2. It's just a healthy dollop of truth I'm afraid. The 60D is a camera made for a market to complete a corporate, objective .. Likewise .. Canon have had a fantastic 2010 Which saw them way out ahead of Sony in the DSLR video popularity contest. But this is purely thanks to good marketing and new product releases not good. " Narrow-minded and feeble-minded. This is not just marketing. Of course, like the GH2 be superior in some video features - she is not synonymous mirror camera - but who wants to please look at the photographs with a "DSLR" by an electronic viewfinder? Just very few and I do not synonymous. That's why I chose the 60D because it has this great feeling of the optical viewfinder of an SLR. Even so, the DSLRs have become synonymous not so popular ... because you can shoot it.
These statements are so completely hooked. Most consumers would like to have a good camera as a video camera - 9 of 10 are sold cameras cameras! What makes Canon product side so wrong? Right, nothing! They're not stupid total.
I'm thinking, here is someone (the portal EOSHD be called) disappointed that the new Canon 60D, the previously impossible
levels of a camera
for 900, - ¬ has not yet been possible.
I laugh my dead
Conclusion:
ME is the 60D then the right choice when I need a good Spielelreflex (photo) camera and like to make super nice videos. For those that prefer electronic viewfinder looks like to have a bit better and Video (only) 24p no preference is to buy the GH2. So simple.
Antwort von pilskopf:
The electronic viewfinder is soooo cool of GH2, who flashed me totally, I would have never thought in such a quality that this one time a B / W Viewfinder depends far in terms of sharpness. So who has not looked through there should not hastily judge. : D
The GH2 way, is synonymous a camera. It is even beautiful photos.
White synonymous not why one needs to Bashen Sun irrelevant. The little mix containing then something on the market, surpassed a two-digit Canon (which should not be that hard) and then comes with so outrageous features like a working AF or aaufnahmefähigem HDMI out, and not even Alias | have Wavefront Mayaing, really cocky the little whore. Since the GH2 is then but has gone too far my man.
No one wants to make you worm your 60d, you are happy with this, but this makes them far better than GH2. And is not this the only page the GH2 praises to the sky, with each of these has worked (except Mweak of course), estimates this little device. Even the likes of a more than a big heavy Canon. Any how he likes it. I think just the Mobile and the light lenses so awesome, my system with 3 lenses and Cam weighs about 1 kilo, with my little Steadi 2 kilos and I can take it anywhere with.
Antwort von DSLR-Freak:
The electronic viewfinder is soooo cool of GH2, who flashed me totally, I would have never thought in such a quality that this one time a B / W Viewfinder depends far in terms of sharpness. So who has not looked through there should not hastily judge. : D
The GH2 way, is synonymous a camera. It is even beautiful photos. The viewfinder is the GH2 with an optical viewfinder really does not compare .... hello? Everyone knows who ever stumbled at Saturn through a little dei transitions. You, too.
Of course, the GH2 is a camera, but just not with mirrors, optical viewfinder and mirror clacking in the lush Shoot. The just do nearly all of the "isolate" is not in the video world. This fact has to just make synonymous the GH2. You, too.
Antwort von pilskopf:
If I shoot a still image that clacks but very beautiful. I even do not even use the LCD but now suddenly the viewfinder, because this is just good clean and I also determine the focus. What do I want more big now? How do you do about this situation because I worm and why do you want me now convinced of what what convinced me long ago? I do not synonymous large Canon otherwise I would have bought a long time, but I like the Alias | Wavefront Mayaing not a Canon, I have never concealed it, for me that is an insufficient condition in video mode. And it goes to video here in the forum and most who are here.
Antwort von DSLR-Freak:
If I shoot a still image that clacks but very beautiful. I even do not even use the LCD but now suddenly the viewfinder, because this is just good clean and I also determine the focus. What do I want more big now? Perhaps more Money of Panasonic?
Antwort von pilskopf:
Who gets money because of Panasonic?
And those spontaneous snapshots so you can shoot synonymous, raw and that is now a Jpeg that is worse in the Gh2 as a raw. http://img2.imagebanana.com/img/8c0jyhw4/full.jpg
The clippers have to hide not sure.
Antwort von Mink:
... Rich mirror clacking on the shoot Yet casual, this pump gun-reload-noise .... You can take pictures so synonymous?
Antwort von DSLR-Freak:
If I shoot a still image that clacks but very beautiful. I hope it clacks not again, if you're going to look at ...
If it is more common clacks with you, you should visit a doctor.
Antwort von pailes:
I have the GH1 and with the viewfinder am absolutely satisfied. I need the optical viewfinder does not not synonymous for photos. On the contrary, with the electronic viewfinder can be made synonymous with manual lenses really sharp photos, you can not of an optical viewfinder exactly say.
Antwort von DSLR-Freak:
... Rich mirror clacking on the shoot
Yet casual, this pump gun-reload-noise .... You can take pictures so synonymous? We should urgently investigate scientifically.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
...
If it is more common clacks with you, you should visit a doctor. Objectively remain boys ;-)
.................
Conclusion remains
For photos, a Canon, Nikon or Pentax
For video, there may still be on the Panasonic GH2, it shows clearly that they s.besten in this area currently stands there with.
That will probably change next year, but again, sleep do not know ;-) Manufacturer
..............
Perso. I would, of course, precisely because access to the 60D focus PHOTOS rests with me.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Zeeni:
What would bother me s.der GH2 really is, the plastic housing.
I have 2 times the Canon 7D and this may just synonymous use in bad weather or without a guilty conscience.
Anyway who only photographed in sunshine / films, the question has to make sure no thoughts.
Furthermore, there is just not really a lot of bright 4 / 3 Lenses. Except I Canon / Nikon / Zeiss adapt etc. - Lenses, then the said weight and size advantages but it is there again.
I can well imagine the additional time to buy GH2. But they will replace my DSLRs probably not.
Antwort von pilskopf:
The good thing is to know that you adapt to a GH2 really can do these things. This is not the other way. These hats you still dream lens with 50mm focal KB, 0,95 f. What's in the sector because for a 60d? Even the 20mm in Crop 1.85 significantly better than a 50mm focal Crop 1.6. And a 1.8 50mm Gibts synonymous for GH2, so it is not so.
Antwort von Zeeni:
Does this apply now to my post?
If so, then all is well and good what you say, but unfortunately does not change the s.den I mentioned two of the main criticisms.
Antwort von pilskopf:
The weather of course, speaks for a 7D, no question. For the optics we have free choice but in fact, of course, in certain respects. Manual "switch" must be the intention then stop. Do I now have a screw on a lens adapter or directly on it hardly makes a difference.
Antwort von Zeeni:
In the optics you have basically in both cases a free choice.
Or put differently: There is more good glass, as it is anyone of us will buy.
Only I just always read back by the weight and size advantage of GH2.
But that is just synonymous quickly back then.
If the part should be really used for serious film, it all depends not synonymous to rig follow focus systems around and Co..
If it is to replace only the small HD camcorder, then GH2 is certainly a top-Camera! Who wants to work with challenging, is to worry about the few grams, which he saves the housing. The rest of the equipment weighs tens of pounds anyway!
But I will not be misunderstood: I think Panasonic's latest baby very interesting and it is quite possible that I allowed myself to create a new GH2. I would be very reluctant to leave alone and only alone.
On 21 I film this month, for example, another wedding. That is cold, should be clear. Whether it gets wet synonymous, I now know just yet. And I have so fortunately synonymous worry. ;-)
Antwort von 9komma81:
What would bother me s.der GH2 really is, the plastic housing.
I have 2 times the Canon 7D and this may just synonymous use in bad weather or without a guilty conscience. The 7D-body is sealed and made of a magnesium alloy, the body of the 60D but not (50D's said to be still?). Must admit though synonymous, the housing of the GH2 not found so great (and the silver strip in the grip they had on my account can save synonymous).
The good thing is to know that you can adapt GH2 s.eine actually everything. And right now there's still one or the other bargain, because let's Canon users are left (have to) as Canon FD-Mount Lenses. By the 1.9 crop it, however, little wide-angle.
