Frage von DSLR-Freak:
Hi,
if s.Strand or generally with similar lighting conditions with minimal depth of field, so would work with Aperture 1.4/1.8 and the typical motion blur, which ND filter you have to use it?
Does anyone know this is a table with typical lighting situations / aperture / shutter speed / cost-ND?
I want to purchase any matte box, etc., but only 1 to 2 ND filter.
Does anyone out?
Thank you!
Antwort von Bernd E.:
Since natural light is not synonymous s.Strand s.DIN feel bound norms, there is not
the filter that always the right one then. For cameras that lack built-in neutral density filter, have therefore adjustable versions, known as "ND Fader proven to:
http://forum.slashcam.de/viewtopic.php?p=444328 # 444 328
Antwort von soan:
Hehe ...
In fact, actually a pretty vergurkte question - alone "sun come" or "sun behind clouds" makes "s.Strand yes even some of aperture difference.
1. For most applications in my experience a 64x ND filter too much - you should so something "less dense" take
2. With Aperture 1.4 can be counter-productive very synonymous film - the audience is looking forward s.and s.synonymous times a bissel of field in the background :-)
3. a variable ND filter is the drug of choice - eg an ND Mark II of Light Craft. Unfortunately, these things are not really neutral gray, which have a brown-orange. Disgusting but very useful the part.
4. We must once synonymous reduce the shutter speed to get to a desired Aperture and have to buy not always open at the bottom. Zb in waves or grasses can s.Strand 1 / 500 synonymous look very interesting.
Antwort von DSLR-Freak:
Hehe ...
In fact, actually a pretty vergurkte question - alone "sun come" or "sun behind clouds" makes "s.Strand yes even some of aperture difference. I will let pass without comment once.
Thanks for the advice. Are there other more neutral filter as Lightcraft with variable density? Do you have a test on this?
Antwort von Mantas:
1.2 or 1.5 with ISO 100 and 1 / 50 sec should first be ok if too dark to even increase istkann iso still good
