Frage von Jitter:
www.camcorderinfo.com has already tested the NTSC version of the Canon HF G10.
Here is the Conclusion: The camcorder produced impressive video in all kinds of shooting situations, and its performance in low light was among the best we've ever seen from a consumer camcorder.
With the HF G10, Essentially you're getting a professional camcorder in consumer body.
Antwort von Jan:
Thanks jitter,
and so we have a Lowlightkönigin as has indeed issued in the men's synonymous Slashcamtest that the new Panasonic SD 909 is not better than the old 700/750.
Then should be synonymous expect in the Canon HF M to class much. So you've made the balancing act of professional sensor technology in consumer camera.
VG
January
Antwort von Replay:
Oha, not bad. Canon was not to the flabby 2010s models inactive. A very interesting part.
Antwort von Jan:
The 2011er of Sony, Samsung and Sony are still missing, Pana has it but "screwed it "....
So fast it is of course one way, I'm only FC Bayern!
VG
January
Antwort von Jitter:
I believe that real interest s.HF G10 test the applicability to the low-cost M-Series. Except for the Optics that the image quality (sharpness, low light, color resolution, etc.) would have no control, the camera head is in fact identical. For little money (649 - 799 ¬) is there in tip top quality cameras. Or better yet wait a year? Then synonymous Canon will not come s.50P.
Antwort von Jitter:
@ Jan
Each bet is to Sonyand JVC at the picture quality change anything. These basic data are too similar to its predecessors. Even Sony's 50P will improve s.den test results very little.
I'm really looking forward to the fanless Panasonic SD 99th Maybe Panasonic brings even more of a chip out so far.
Antwort von Replay:
Well, Sony was already extremely well in the race, cracking sharp, without artificial sharpness. Only the colors ... oO And of the Laser Touch stupid they go away synonymous. Let's see what happens.
Some Sony's have been developed from scratch. The CX130 has the CX115 with only the sensor together, nothing else.
Antwort von Jitter:
The same sensor will provide with assurance that CX 115 and 130, the picture will be very similar (which does not even against the CX 130). From an entirely new signal processing by Sony is not the question. The optical Image Stabilization makes a difference. I hope the extended Wide Angle is not bought with distortion.
