Frage von Anja.de:
Hi, I now have half a day trying to find out what hardware for my claims is the best and still have no idea what I should be growth.
Specifically, can I execute the following work:
1. Video material of
- Canon XL1S
- SONY HDR-TG1
- Canon XL H1
2. The material is currently captured with Premiere or converted so that it is in AE can be used.
3. Any editing will be made exclusively in AE, then render.
4. As a result, Flash videos will come out, which I this time, sometimes that tool use.
As the specialist suspects I have very little idea of codecs, formats, etc. - exactly what I will not have synonymous. Everything interests me is that I have my materials in the calculator wars, with AE zusammenbastle there afterward to possible small, but still suitable video quality to have. In particular, I like it with much larger Resolutionzu work around for the end product smaller (eg 496 * x) picture to be able to take cuttings.
So far, it worked on the old Storm 2 720 * 576 and output 320 * x, * x 496 times.
Besides editing it cost me the most time on the rendering to wait and just annoying. As far as I understand it, all the cards can only work in certain resolutions, so I have so far, eg in 720 * 576 was allowed to work afterwards with another tool to a smaller format to come. To me is missing but the use of illustrations.)
Since the new cameras provide 1920 * x and I, for example 496 * x wants to spend, so I would need a hardware which s.besten any Resolutionper hardware codec can process. Alternatively, should the new Storm 1920 for example, swallow and then with 720 * 576 to work. (Footage in 1920 * and composition in x 720 * x)
Hmm, hope I have the morning halfway s.frühen can explain and even more that I get to the jumps can help.
Short again: purely material in 1920, in AE with significantly smaller compositional process render. With Sound join. At the final size as a Flash video bring.
LG
Anja
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Hi
Why do you want to directly capture a smaller format?
Suspension s.Firewire the Cam and capture all original. Then you can still download reckon if you like.
But now with the AD converter is einzuspeisen but blödsinn
un the XL H1 is synonymous not 1920
................
And you can synonymous directly from AE or Premiere in Flash can convert.
And regarding your cards / converter question
Matrox card like you do not need the same.
Canopus same converter, you need not be synonymous, or is sometimes better than pure card.
Alla
Good luck
B. DeKid
Antwort von camworks:
Canopus converter equal
nonsense. Canopus is ne company, which offers everything possible so synonymous cut cards (not only transducers). anja has obviously a dvstorm of Canopus, as I made the text herauslese.
@ anja:
if you are not especially difficult material (or something similar), you can capture via firewire and the files then import into after effects. that should be synonymous with HDV smoothly, your cameras to record. about all you need is not really a map. there is a freeware hdvsplit which can http://www.heise.de/software/download/hdvsplit/43186
the new Canopus stormhd is primarily intended, during the editing (synonymous in after effects) a full screen output on a preview monitor output. additionally, it has to file certain hardware on the card, the rausrendern speed. whether the Fool synonymous with the case, I can not conjure grad. Edius 5 goes in but. in Edius synonymous extracts can you do if the project eg in 720 x 576 and is the source material in HDV.
