Frage von composite:
Hi!
Times wanted to ask what you think. Seems to be minimally burdensome than the pseudo-Irgendwasteile monopod, you can find.
I know I have not really come from, but already know that such solutions need much training time and then usually still do not look to Hollywood.
Times still wanted to ask if the part is possibly useful.
The guy is definitely creepy: 0)
http://billingham.de/Neuheiten/Schwebestativ_Benbo_FloPod/schwebestativ_benbo_flopod.html
Antwort von rtzbild:
Give it a look,
You have 14 days right of return, o)
Antwort von composite:
If not what is coming yet, it's running out. : 0)
But hope dies last ...
Antwort von rtzbild:
In the bay there was the day a great tripod, NP about 500, went for 104 or so away, I habs are not needed, but s.and to what is really good.
But why take nicht'n gammelig monopod and try first "dry"?
Counterweights machste you from old (but please washed) socks and coarse gravel, alternatively thick washers for construction machinery (Sun M20 x 50 x 3).
Kommt halt depends on what you need _wirklich_, Effects take only when the film otherwise is never be topped.
(Good lighting, good sound, good tripod?)
HTH
Olli
Antwort von composite:
Old socks nice and good, but because what the situation now to the part on the site? : 0)
Does the design of usable, because of fluid and so?
Antwort von rtzbild:
"look ..."
Well, form follows function, I hope at least that what is good ... the principle is so clear, it might work, yes, like all low budget designs of this kind
Attempt makes kluch, I need something, I would _evtl._ times to buy a trial if I get it _sehr_ favorable.
LG Olli
Antwort von composite:
There, they say yes, that the camera remains horizontal ... I've never seen it in other low-cost providers.
Antwort von jansi:
Hm yes then it looks to me interesting.
But since I can not "suspended construction" recognize.
The question is synonymous:
1. What kind of camera do you have?
2. What do you need it (rarely or every day)?
3. And how much do you want to spend a whole?
This tripod looks to me more like a converted monopod stand out, and if you use a tripod ... Oh oh
I could get a fairly cheap, but good friend:
Glidecam 2000 Pro (costs around 300-400)
Antwort von JMitch:
So if the type of the Page not supplied one, you can do that part so test times. But with the tip of the monopod is really recommended, I've done the same:
Take a monopod and mount a plate below. Through this panel you have 2 holes drilled. Through these holes come with screws, washers s.denen you can attach. As I grip on me a tube clamp made (a part that holds together a tube) That I take a grip on it made a drill.
Antwort von JMitch:
Camera is the 320th GS
Use: Often. : 0)
What exactly is the difference now to the Benbo?
Antwort von jansi:
@ Host
Hm, yeah? As a monopod tripod? which is very unusual that the funzt
I denkemal that you swing the tripod for camera use?
Then you can use this solution Monopod forget it's all one wackelei.
For "proper" floating tripod is a ball joint in place, which I somehow can not detect
I would simply synonymous try!
Antwort von hannes:
> When "right" floating tripod is a ball joint in place ...
is rather rare, usually use the Gimbals.
This can be synonymous with the monopod practice
where one camera on the thumb and forefinger stores.
Does, however, a little exercise.
(and I have now)
Molt rekords desde la Bahia de Roses
hannes
Antwort von jansi:
Honestly?
This can be synonymous with the monopod practice
where one camera on the thumb and forefinger stores. And it works with camera? Cool.
Antwort von JMitch:
more than 2 kg will be probably difficult to ...
Antwort von jansi:
Well, if you have a serious 2kg Camera has then probably synonymous enough coal to get a full floating system to buy (with west, such as the V25)
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... if you have a serious 2kg Camera has then probably synonymous enough coal to get a full floating system to buy (with west, such as the V25) Strange statement. For your information: The Glidecam V25 will cost around 9000 euros. That would be - even for an owner so incredibly heavy camera ;-) - only worthwhile if one part of the job often can be used. For occasional or hobby use are much cheaper alternatives attractive.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von JMitch:
Sure, I thought synonymous of a scheme such as the V25
Since there are already responsible for 2000 ¬.
Just like you've already said, the worth of "normal" hobby filmmakers simply nich.
Antwort von JMitch:
Ne Nochml Question: What is this joint? If the suspension and dampens vibrations?
Antwort von hannes:
> What is this joint? If the suspension and dampens vibrations?
it "brings" nothing you (;-))
It allows, however, the camera in a vertical position, although you move the hand. As springs and dampers are completely inappropriate.
Is the Camera a rotation participate, you must be with your thumb to block the camp easily. That requires plenty of exercise!
With the monopod, but you must be just as long practice until halfway clean rides in the box are. Here's aggravating that the long leg slightly inclined to commute. With wind, you can maneuver it out without totally forgotten.
Molt rekords desde la Bahia de Roses
hannes
Antwort von JMitch:
Ah, OK. Danke, hab's now quite savvy.
As I said, that all these 'solutions' only with exercise at work somewhat, it is clear to me already.
One last question I would have but still: 0)
The extent to which swings a fluttering tripod with ball bearings as this http://www.schwebestative.de/ for something dynamic Stop and Go after visible?
With simple things such as the counterweight to remain steady Tracker is not really of course horizontal, but are perhaps a little 'docile'...?
Antwort von JMitch:
Whether and how much something nachschwingt depending on how well it is balanced.
As a rule of thumb is:
- The better the decoupling of the Camera of your arm (that ever leichtläufiger the joint), the less the Ruckler of your arm to the camera on.
- The same is true but synonymous in the other direction: For a good joint transmits the "rest" of your arm at a slow camera movement not to the Camera and it vibrates to, if not everything is perfectly balanced.
The simple monopod-my-hand-is-the-joint solutions that are not perfectly austarieren can / should be on the wrist no optimal decoupling / reassurance, but on the other actively with the wrist after swinging the opposite effect can.
The professional solutions to optimal decoupling, it must be very accurate but then austarieren (emphasis in the fulcrum of the joint), so it does not nachschwingt.
Very enlightening in reference to how After Schwingen arises when the focus is not the fulcrum of the joint is, I found the video
stability_of_balance Glidecam-Page
Prinzipiell geht es synonymous nicht darum, die Camera immer senkrecht ausgerichtet zu lassen. Die Camera sollte in
each layer can remain calm, and not in the vertical back commute. Camera tracks with slight inclination may be interesting indeed synonymous.
