Frage von DeSade:
Hello,
Is there a way a film in Cinemascope format (1:2,35)
establish if one with an XL-2 will record in 16:9 mode.
Crop That is one possibility, but (the loss of resolution!).
There is Anamorphic for the XL-2, to a permit, and the like, there is the loss of resolution.
besten dank!
Antwort von Axel:
Hello,
The question is, why do you want to use the material. Since the Fazen of DV material for a cinema showing eh is already critical, you should be in the XL2 to be content with the widescreen version. Some cinemas have 1:1,66 he image masks, it would then be a small black bars above and below. All the cinemas have 1:1,85 he masks, then your picture would be minimally pruned, since 16:9 yes 1:1,78 roughly equal. Cinemascope is based on an anamorphic movies yes equalization of all the available film image, while in the case of 1.85, about half of these will Resolutiongecroppt. This, of course, more s.Resolutionist synonymous necessary, because the picture is indeed increased in general much stronger than in widescreen. That is not equalized Picture veer towards a 4:3 aspect ratio, ie, it is almost square. Small wonder, as a CS-Lens nothing more than a 1:1:33 - Optics is one with davorgesetzten equalizer. The intent of you would have desired, therefore, be a completely new development, your 16:9 chip will be used at all. The question remains, how you judge the material for the recording. My fears: That does not survive the DV footage!
Crop That is one possibility, but (the loss of resolution!). Should the film, however, only the appearance (aspect ratio) have a movie, but are issued on DVD or through a powerful projector, the resolution loss is not so plays a major role. You can even take one of several intermediate sizes that exist in the movies synonymous, such as 1:2,10.
There is Anamorphic for the XL-2, to a permit, and the like, there is the loss of resolution. No clue.
Antwort von MiXMaster:
Hi
The problem is not solved with a P + S Mini35mm adapter, which you just use Cinemascope Objetive? When in 4:3 (about CS) receives, it should not be an issue.
Is as far as I can remember "LAND OF PLANTY" of Wim Wenders synonymous aufegnomen on DV and had a picture in CinemaScope movies. The problem s.der thing is that such films should be better displayed on small screens.
Greeting
Tino
Antwort von Axel:
There is Anamorphic for the XL-2, to a permit, and the like, there is the loss of resolution. Hello Sade,
just happened to come across an article that claims that is exactly double 16:9 Cinemascope, it meant that if you were the electronic 16:9 function (so you do not have to) simultaneously with one Century / Optex - Anam. attachment are using you get exactly 1:2,35. This I can verify a mathematical idea is not free, but here's the link:
http://members.macconnect.com/users/b/ben/widescreen/index.html
Should it therefore be for one of your XL2 - Lenses such resolve, you could have quite obviously the best solution, since it no Resolutionverlorengeht. The problems that you had when editing, I can not currently overlooked. Include as standard 16:9 and adjust distort the entire material on ratio /?
