Newsmeldung von slashCAM: Cloverfield and marketing of indie-rob - 24 Jan 2008 11:48:00
Quite so small and low budget seems to be used in Cloverfield Camera then not to have been ... While the pages of producers tried everything, the film, we say "low", handheld-style a la Blair Witch Project to give - but in fact was with Sony's F23 Cinealta filmed (with the safety not less than 100,000 dollars, is ). The extent to which short sequences actually synonymous with prosumer HD cams have been filmed, is still speculative. It remains only to note: Indie Image sells ...
This is an auto-generated entry
Antwort von DeeZiD:
Well, the HD1080p trailer in mp4 format already said everything, right? xD
Antwort von Christian Schmitt:
Well, the HD1080p trailer in mp4 format already said everything, right? xD What should have said?
Apparently some were actors and extras
additional "Handycam", where (more precisely, the HVX200) to "authentic" material.
http://laist.com/2008/01/09/laist_interview_88.php
This holds zumndest director HVX ne ...
Nevertheless, there were enough cameramen the scenes "skillfully blurred" shots ...
And digital is rotated at a desired docu-look at it, right?
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
The CineAlta and take a cramp trying to "documentary" get this look, while others in the prosumer class despair at the "film look" tinker? How off :-)
Antwort von castingeurope:
I find such films corrosive!
Also Blair Witch Project. But what I want to see the film and not a deliberate shake inside have.
I love hand shots, without a tripod and I have nothing against synonymous DV look like in 28 or so days later.
But intentionally herumzuwackeln brings me nothing but headaches out of PR gag for the film
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... intentionally herumzuwackeln brings me nothing except headaches ... Sorry to break this bad habit synonymous with television productions to some Docus On. Such a stylistic device just annoying, if not by the image content is justified - and this is now very rarely the case ( "Blair Witch Project", however, would be for me one of those few exceptions).
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von svennibskciu:
I think that a "Wobbler" s.der just the right place unsichbarsten cut allows ...
Antwort von zufallsgast:
Who says that the intention wckler are?
perhaps they can 's not better ....
lg gast
Antwort von roedely:
I think with the type of the camera operator was the easy einfych n roll is pure ..
the bad dream orgy isn, absolutely perfectly real and that is synonymous very difficult times when you want it specifically for such a film!
Q23 Why, I thought Panavision genesis?! s.ende is indeed "filmed with Panavision digital" .. ?! whuat
I think the film hauptsaächlich with its HDV fullhd consumer or rotated in the thick of the CGI shots with GENESIS ..
you see it s.einer imagine totally cool, as the alternate Section kamer happens: as the house behind the cloud collapses and comes running it into a business and put out the camera vertically and then move but nothing more than one ton .. getting up again and outside it, everything is broken and the Bils extremely well and super sharp and it just prior to bursting geil made CGI shots!
wonderful!
Antwort von roedely:
Someone knows how the system was cut?
Antwort von Axel:
Eben, I have the first twenty minutes seen. More I must not see me even though everyone said, the monster had succeeded in the last quarter and actually the best.
It is true that much jitter does not necessarily his. Here someone has the first five of the
Antwort von Axel:
What I really wanted to say: Blair Witch and the Killer Tomato Matscher content are not my thing, the synchronization of such a "realistic" improvised dialogues never succeed, that's all incredibly stupid.
Very exciting, I find, however, the dynamics as such.
And that it is more important what happens in front of the camera, than the question whether this or that technology would have been better.
