Frage von tg:
What is the exact difference between the two models, except the on the market since?
And why you should choose more?
Thank you!
Antwort von VolkerS:
Hello,
on the Panasonic website, you can compare the models directly. One difference is as the Lens.
Antwort von slysee:
Hello,
on the Panasonic website, you can compare the models directly. One difference is as the Lens. I've already made, but unfortunately that does not help me much. As such, the two have different characteristics for Lenses / advantages / disadvantages?
Antwort von Acer:
The Panasonic NV-GS140 has a MUCH better lens than the NV-GS180
(mal compare a Mercedes with one Trabbi) thereafter:
(compare times a LEICA lens with a no-name Panasonic Lens)
You will need to remember the difference for good or ill;.)
Ciao,
Philipp
Antwort von Jan:
In addition, there are two different classes.
New model GS 280 / old GS 140
Class of deep N-ews Model GS 180 / old GS 75
The differences between the GS 3 CCD 's, we have already chewed through dozens of times, especially synonymous Acer, search and pick the models.
so off the cuff
+ GS 140 - as of Acer stated Leica Optics
Included Battery + DU 12 ca 2 h
- No reeler 16 / 9 mode
+ GS 180
+ Real 16 / 9 mode, with more wide-angle
+ A few more new features, such as eg anti-ground shooting
- Only about 6 Battery DU good 45 min
LG
Jan
Antwort von Acer:
I thought the AGS would only S.280, did you learn it?
Antwort von Jan:
Now you make me very embarrassed, I can remember so well, yes I think you're right, it would need Do not look up times.
But eh ne Nobody really needs the function, if it's in a hurry and you of films of a bridge as a ship below langfährt - switches the camera in auto mode, the breaks, one might AGS off in the menu, you must first but probably always pay attention - which wants to film it. An experienced filmmakers will get AGS as synonymous to OFF.
Yes some functions, such as eg Tele Macro all 2006er Pana 3CCD's, so I had probably grad is a fallacy - the Pana stop with what you want ....
LG
Jan
Antwort von tg:
First of all thanks for the many replies.
Incidentally, I had already used the search feature, but unfortunately found a thread with direct See - sorry.
So I would rather take the more expensive, older model 140, rather than the 180? The 280 that is unfortunately beyond my budget.
Is there somewhere a couple of test videos of the 180 to download?
I once had found on a Russian Page a couple of videos to the 150, but I know the URL anymore.
Antwort von Jan:
Videos and Stillimage's web can not always be trusted, is only as an overview.
Unless you know the user more closely.
Since then I have a Canon pro ever looked over his shoulder, what you can do with all the images (eg. Photoshop), image noise effectively fight to change a face completely before (wrinkles, bad skin, change the grim looking) - synonymous into Positive , one hears the images in the popular newspapers go through it all an elaborate post-production.
Again relating to the corresponding upgraded GS 180 (Resolution) - which actually is the successor of the GS 75, GS has the 140th I would take the case of price limit, the GS 180, eg, despite the small battery's at 16 / 9, the GS 180 ahead before the GS 140, makes how much a "Leica" lens in a 500-600 ¬ camera, you can have an idea when you see the pure high-quality Leica optics significantly more expensive, simple binoculars 8x20 9 ¬, tempered lenses such as Nikon and Minolta ca 80 ¬ - the Leica 8x20 about 300 ¬! In the photo area some cheap "Leica" lens of Minolta were produced - had the time to cooperate. Is probably similar to the digicam's Pansonic's with Leica Optics 300-500 ¬ synonymous not bring much high contrast, sharper, more free pictures of aberrations.
Because the two do not belong in the same class, it gets no VS. Test type, time can only compare the individual scores of the two - and be in the Let's be quite near.
LG
Jan
Antwort von Acer:
But the LEICA lens of the NV-GS140??
Antwort von tg:
The small battery is 180 for me, not an obstacle, since I'm going to buy anyway even bigger nen it. And the 180s Pros supports PAL (16:9) to me is really no preference because I do not use. Just as the AGS usSpielereien. Is important to me that the camera makes better pictures. :-)
The Leica lens, the 140 is not a reason to buy?
Somebody has some links to reviews from the two cams and / or videos?
The post with the videos of me is already clear, but if it compares an independent body, one can assume there really know that the videos are unedited. See also a relative. Only as a guide.
Somehow, I now know almost as much as before. :-(
Antwort von Acer:
On the computer monitor, and the strong compression of the web page have no way to judge the image quality from a camcorder to give.
Personally, I find the LEICA lens, the 140 appealing, but the 16:9 synonymous is 180, not without.
Since the NV-GS140 in prices is not as strong as the NV-GS180 does that mean that she still has more value than the NV-GS180, and it wants to mean something.
Ciao,
Philipp
Antwort von Skinnyrules:
So in my opinion that with the Leica lenses is still well overvalued here! A real Leica lens, that is, by and through cost of Leica lenses, and including their original remuneration will probably already own, at the very least 800,00 euros. Even with the small Digiknipsen of how the Panasonic Lumix is probably more of a selling point for the average Media Markt / Saturn salesman. Honestly, who is expected to be 200.00 to 300.00 eur been a real Leica?
Overall, I'm convinced that through the cooperation of Panasonic with Leica lenses in Panasonicprodukten benefit all of them, not just those in which Leica is on it. The image quality of the Panasonic lenses I already find it very good.
So I would decide between a GS140 and GS180 do not depend of the Leica name!
Antwort von Jan:
Even with the small Digiknipsen of how the Panasonic Lumix is probably more of a selling point for the average Media Markt / Saturn salesman. Honestly, who is expected to be 200.00 to 300.00 eur been a real Leica? Well actually I should myself as Saturn Seller not comment, several forums will be video of (the Grossgrößen / sogennannten the polygraph so Professionals) named the Carl Zeiss / Leica Optics at the consumers of one of the main reasons for buying.
What we should not need long to think how much Carl Zeiss in the 300 ¬ SonyHC 17 may - Optics 50 ¬?, I can well imagine as Saturn's lousy salesman.
Several magazines confirm this, and give a Canon / Panasonic picture quality in a similar price range.
Even well-known trade magazines ala Stillimage color (think 35 years s.Markt) bring the Leica lens as a reason to buy, strangely enough, the FX 8 / 9 in terms of image contrast / vignetting / distortion / spherical aberration, not outstanding but good average, since even the most " experts "by surprise.
The Lens of the GS 140 but one can not overstate prefer TG.
Huge differences even more so for beginners does not exist for the pair.
LG
Jan
Antwort von Clip:
... Incidentally, I've synonymous with Saturn already experienced sales people who know what they are talking at Media Markt contrast, is still not at all.
In my narrow circle of acquaintances, there is a Lumix FX8 and and a (similar) and an old Pentax Optio Sony5MP with Zeiss optics. In a pure Comparison of the image results of these 3 cams would end up with my Lumix on the very last place.
Can only confirm: vignetting and distortion rather moderate in Comparison with the other two, but were noticed in several s.meisten verschiederne tests, the extreme chromatic aberration, actually exactly (which is very good especially when lenses calculated at Alber digit realm, see Olympus) should not happen, exactly! That was the little Pentax and the Sonyin this little test both better.
LG,
Chris
Antwort von Acer:
As it is in the Canon lenses? Those are then mount lenses, or lenses with Canon sit near the front?
Antwort von Clip:
Results of Canon Digital snapping I've seen: of one of the Ixus and Powershot S70. My subjective impression: good image files in real terms next to the above angesprochne!
In the DV cams I can not say anything. But imagine that in terms of Canon lenses, even with the front runners are well.
Gruss,
C.
Antwort von Jan:
With video cameras to get out very hard, which signal processor - except preisst Canon's DIG! C DV - or the new DIG! C II in the XL H 1 - any time, it is the lens coatings, etc. available ...
Sony - Carl Zeiss, s.HC 90 / 94 / 96 Carl Zeiss T *
Panasonic - Panasonic Optics s.GS 140 / 150 / 280 / 300 Leica Optics
Canon - Canon Optics, s.XM 2 "L" series, we learn little else.
Canon camcorder models s.das available in all glass lenses are fitted, although we had last time in "hair", because a well-tempered Kunstofflinse must be worse than (a non / less tempered glass lens eyewear The issue was raised-and The glass lenses are synonymous Kunstofflinsen of ummandelt)
Canon's digicam beginners get their ca 7 lenses - 1 Aspheric Lens
IXUS / Powershot's higher value (eg S 70) Model 2 aspherical / UA Lens
Top models such as S 2 IS / S 3 IS getting to the aspheric lens or a UD Lens
( "L" fluoride similar) to the Farbsäumeproblem - chromatic aberration - is to effectively combat them.
All this brings better contrast, sharper image (up to the edges), accurate color reproduction.
Yes Canon tinkers s.Objektiven so to 60 years, but some German (Leica / Zeiss - the true cost money!) Are to estimate even further.
LG
Jan
