Frage von Andreas Bruns:
Hello NG!
I have a question s.Euch experts, and I in the documentation
could not find.
I have a customized recording together with the length of
about 4:20 hours from DV sources.
If I draus in Premiere Elements 2, a DVD, we recommend
There is the possibility to adjust the quality. Either auto
or manual.
My question: What exactly we adapted? Only the data, since
these displays, or the synonymous formats?
If the result is a DVD, the DVD-conventions?
Or is it better to export the movie and then
small to be expected? And underpinning Premiere Elements 2, if I
the MPEG-select Export.
I want to avoid me several hours of computation to save
especially since I only have a weak calculator (1700 MHz) available
and have the presentation in large steps closer.
Andreas.
Antwort von Wilko Finke:
Andreas Bruns wrote:
> I have a question s.Euch experts, and I in the documentation
> Could not find.
Hmm, I'm not an expert, but (hopefully) soon. ;)
> I have a customized recording together with the length of
> About 4:20 hours from DV sources.
Doku?
> If I draus in Premiere Elements 2, a DVD, we recommend
> There is the possibility to adjust the quality. Either auto
> Or manual.
* * The grusel of Adobe MPEG Encoder, I dare not. If you're good
Want to achieve results, rather Encode with Tmpenc. That
I have the best results.
So in a double-layer DVD you have to reasonably vivid
Quality to get a DVD, but 4.5 hours to 4.7 GB's will
difficult.
> My question: What exactly we adapted? Only the data, since
> This show is synonymous or the formats?
>
> If the result is a DVD, the DVD-conventions?
Manually, you should have a AUDIO_TS folder and add on
a menu to reflect.
> Or is it better to export the movie and then
> Small to expect? And underpinning Premiere Elements 2, if I
> Export to MPEG-selecting.
As a movie (avi) and then export as DV Tmpenc Avi (bottom
Field first) improvise on. To a large Encodierzeit you will
probably not get round. At the traffic, I would
with the best quality with computation time expected 6-7 hours. :)
> I would like to avoid me several hours of computation to save
> Especially since I only have a weak calculator (1700 MHz) available
> And have the presentation in large steps closer.
Overnight can expect, is the motto. Good luck!
Wilko
Antwort von Andreas Bruns:
Wilko Finke wrote:
> Andreas Bruns wrote:
>
>> I have a question s.Euch experts, and I in the documentation
>> Could not find.
>
> Hmm, I'm not an expert, but (hopefully) soon. ;)
Then I'm going to press the thumb firmly.
>> I have a customized recording together with the length of
>> About 4:20 hours from DV sources.
>
> Documentation?
Almost. Recording a club-length performance with
Speeches, dances and ceremonies.
I still needs a little rausschnieden, because it is synonymous
a copy on VHS tape with 240 min made.
> * * The grusel of Adobe MPEG Encoder, I dare not. If you're good
> Want to achieve results, rather Encode with Tmpenc. That
> I have the best results.
Good. I had the thought of me almost.
> So in a double-layer DVD you have to reasonably vivid
> DVD quality on a given, but 4.5 hours to 4.7 GB's will
> Difficult.
But 4 hours in VHS quality but should be feasible.
> As a movie (avi) and then export as DV Tmpenc Avi (bottom
> Field first) improvise on. To a large Encodierzeit you will
> Probably not get round. At the traffic, I would
> At best quality with computation time expected 6-7 hours. :)
If this is more secure, I will do so.
> Let overnight, is the motto. Good luck!
All clear. Thanks for the help.
Andreas.
Antwort von Wilko Finke:
Andreas Bruns wrote:
> Then I'm going to press the thumb firmly.
Hehe, thanks.
> Almost. Recording a club-length performance with
> Speeches, dances and ceremonies.
Oh man, but because you really had a lot of work. If I
only to the log of the entire raw material thinking ...
> I still need a little rausschnieden, because it is synonymous
> A copy on VHS tape with 240 min made.
You then draw of DVD, right? Direct off on VHS from the Calculator
from s.and could produce to a Zuckeln.
[Tmpenc]
> Good. I had the thought of me almost.
You will no qualitative difference to purchase a DVD is.
;)
>> So in a double-layer DVD you have to reasonably vivid
>> Quality to get a DVD, but 4.5 hours to 4.7 GB's will
>> Difficult.
>
> But 4 hours in VHS quality but should be feasible.
Klaro it will go. But as I said then s.besten of the DVD
Copies draw.
> Got it. Thanks for the help.
No problem, gern geschehen.
Many greetings
Wilko
Antwort von Andreas Bruns:
Wilko Finke wrote:
>> Almost. Recording a club-length performance with
>> Speeches, dances and ceremonies.
>
> Oh man, but because you really had a lot of work. If I
> Only to the log of the entire raw material thinking ...
Yes, that's true. And I am come as the Virgin with the child.
And of course, no plan ... and only improvised equipment.
>> I have still a little rausschnieden, because it is synonymous
>> A copy on VHS tape with 240 min made.
>
> You then draw of DVD, right? Direct off on VHS from the Calculator
> From s.and could produce to a Zuckeln.
I wanted the VHS copy of the DVD player made. You
Certificate of me that I was right.
> [Tmpenc]
>> Good. I had the thought of me almost.
>
> You'll no qualitative difference to purchase a DVD
> Find. ;)
I am pleased to hear that. Only the images corresponding to the non -
Results of a professional team. As I said: no Vorbreitungszeit,
no sound equipment and no experience. But it is already.
In the past, the records are not perfectly synonymous.
And practice makes perfect.
>>> So in a double-layer DVD you have to reasonably vivid
>>> Quality to get a DVD, but 4.5 hours to 4.7 GB's will
>>> Difficult.
>>
>> But 4 hours in VHS quality but should be feasible.
>
> Klaro it will go. But as I said then s.besten Of DVD
> Copies of the draw.
All clear.
Andreas.
Antwort von Jürgen_He:
Wilko Finke wrote:
> [...]
> * * The grusel of Adobe MPEG Encoder, I dare not. [...]
A really convincing and well fundiertese argument.
Gruß, Jürgen
Antwort von Wilko Finke:
Jürgen He wrote:
>> * * The grusel of Adobe MPEG Encoder, I dare not. [...]
>
> A really convincing and well fundiertese argument.
Do Right! After about 150 DVDs encoded with Premiere, I would have my
Aversion / frustration more can express. Pros my
Astonishment what makes Tmpenc so. :)
Many greetings
Wilko
Antwort von Andreas Bruns:
Wilko Finke wrote:
> As a movie (avi) and then export as DV Tmpenc Avi (bottom
> Field first) improvise on. To a large Encodierzeit you will
> Probably not get round. At the traffic, I would
> At best quality with computation time expected 6-7 hours. :)
Now have the movie as a DV-AVI export. The first attempt is
failed, as I the whole "s.einem piece" wanted to make.
Premiere broke with the simple message "File could not be
produced "or something like that from.
Did it in two pieces, approximately 3:50 p.m. the night and 0:30
tried this morning and lo and behold: 2 files with about 50 and
6 GB were on the record. I find odd, because NTFS yes no
Restrictions in the size, or?
As the synonymous was Tmpenc (why is this thing really so?)
is now busy s.ackern to darau an MPEG2 with 352x288 pixels
for the DVD to make.
Andreas.
Antwort von Wilko Finke:
Andreas Bruns wrote:
> Have now the movie as a DV-AVI export. The first attempt is
> Failed, as I the whole "s.einem piece" wanted to make.
> Premiere broke with the banal error message "File could not be
> Be created "or something like that from.
Had not the problem, but do not synonymous program of
4.5 hr s.Start. :)
> Have it in two pieces, approximately 3:50 p.m. the night and 0:30
> Tried this morning and lo and behold: 2 files with about 50 and
> 6 GB were on the record. I find odd, because NTFS yes no
> More restrictions in the size, or?
Such a big project I had yet to premiere, only to
AVID DV.
> How was the synonymous, Tmpenc (why is this thing really so?)
> Is now busy s.ackern to darau an MPEG2 with 352x288 pixels
> For the DVD to make.
I thought you want to work with 720x576! At 352x288, you can you
detour Tmpenc actually save money. : / When you see the size
synonymous with premiere no significant differences.
4:3 And if you want to stay, it should actually be 352x264,
otherwise you verzerrst anamorph. That means you'll get into the long-drawn
Faces.
But you just wanted to make a preview, right?
Freu you ever set up a chapter, for the DVD. ;)
Many greetings
Wilko
Antwort von Andreas Bruns:
Hello!
>> How was the synonymous, Tmpenc (why is this thing really so?)
>> Is now busy s.ackern to darau an MPEG2 with 352x288 pixels
>> For the DVD to make.
>
> I thought you want to work with 720x576! At 352x288, you can you
> Detour Tmpenc actually save money. : / When you see the size
> Synonymous with premiere no significant differences.
The lower Resolutionwollte I choose to Space spraren
and the data costs.
> 4:3 And if you want to stay, it should actually be 352x264,
> Otherwise you verzerrst anamorph. That means you'll get into the long-drawn
> Faces.
Since you have right, of course!
> But you just wanted to make a preview, right?
> Freu you ever set up a chapter, for the DVD. ;)
Will probably just 10 chapters, which should
not so complicated.
At the moment I am annoyed about my RW blanks, the
DVD player does not play correctly. The stuttering and bucking
is partly extreme. I have but the most precious normal
Media sacrifice.
Andreas.
Antwort von Heinz Boehringer:
Hello Andreas,
>>> How was the synonymous, Tmp (G) enc (why is this thing really so?)
>>
(T) sunami (Mp) e (g Enc) or
Gruss
Heinz
Antwort von Andreas Bruns:
Andreas Bruns wrote:
> Will probably just 10 chapters, which should
> Not so complicated.
Thus, there are a total of 19 chapters have advocated distributed on 2 DVDs
will. If I use the whole thing to bring a DVD, when the dances
and fast movement or panning a strong education pixels
to detect, because the data is probably too low.
I had hoped, with a DVD for 4:12 hours
ends meet, but it's synonymous. My fear is that
the VHS tape (240 min) proved to be not aussreicht
Fortunately, as unfounded. It seems there are good reserves
to give.
Andreas.
