Frage von pierrehansen:
Good day!
I have a problem and hope you can help me. It fails in Cubase 4.1 to MPEG2 videos correctly. I have the video in Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0 on the Media Encoder rendered. If I do it in Windows Media Player or VLC play the video looks great. The true aspect ratio (16:9). The sound runs synchronously. Everything perfect. Now I would like the video tonmässig in Cubase 4.1 next edit. My attempts fail now, however, always that Cubase is not the video in the correct aspect ratio represents. The Picture is narrower, with elongated heads, etc. Also the sound will not run synchronously. Latency is about 1 second. In the Device Manager of Cubase is the Direct Rendering on show set. Premiere Pro 2.0 is used for rendering the codec "MainConcept MPEG Video." It has been synonymous not chosen another switch. There are only those for MPEG2.
I think it has something with the codec to do, or with DirectX. I know myself but unfortunately too little to resolve the problem. Is not it so that if a codec "exists" is that each program that you can rely? Or how does it work? I am amazed that all programs such as Media Player or VLC no problems with the representation that Cubase was. For safety's sake I have all updates carried out Service Pack 3, Directx 9.0 but the problem still exists.
Weiss anyone the solution?
Thank you. Many greetings!
Pierre Hansen
Antwort von InSomnius:
Regards.
I'm not sure, but the video function of cubase is just a behelfsding ... for video post-production is just battleship Steinberg Nuendo thought. I consider it possible that - tatatataaaaa - cubase simply moving and may not represent 16:9.
I work with SX3, I know not whether there are perhaps what has been changed to cubase 4th But at least for SX3 can not synonymous ja video export, but only the ton.
The Greeting
Griffin
Antwort von Axel:
It fails in Cubase 4.1 to MPEG2 videos correctly. As early as possible. Mpeg2 is not the best codec to the processor, which is still dealing with other things is not to stress. With the original you can not work? Or, if HDV, with any JPEG photo * in case of small resolution? Check it out here Slashcam of linked essays Walter Murch, since gets the sound mixing for film traditionally always the worst gossip copies. The sound was so much the better, and to the full quality, there was one eye-opening experience.
* EDIT: Nope, colleague says, is the need synonymous.
