Frage von *the.jokeR*:My first question is: with what programs you cut in Hollywood? There are certainly no Programs such as Adobe Premiere oderso used ... and: what programs are in hollywood afterfx used instead? very many different?
Thanks for all of your answers!
Antwort von *the.jokeR*:
None ne unknowing or is too stupid to ask?
Antwort von etch:
yes, sau silly question.
and "cut" writes one still with only one T. ..
Antwort von Electric Nick:
FinalCut, avid, flame, shake, nuke .. irgendwie sowas denk ich mal
Antwort von Axel:
None ne unknowing or is too stupid to ask? Absolutely not stupid, but very interesting. I only know a few chunks, not much:
Stanley Kubrick used revolutionary 1987 an offline video editing system based on software for
Full Metal Jacket. Remember me from the daily press. Reinhartshausen time can be seen only by Avid act or its prototypes.
Martin Scorsese claimed in his history of American film (http://german.imdb.com/title/tt0112120/) of
1995 that with the possibility of films digitizer, the tools are very Hollywood had propagated, so most digital cut.
The Coen brothers (Fargo, Big Lebowski) cut with FinalCut happy.
Przygodda Peter says to "cuts in space and time," nonlinear cut movies (I think he sits in front Avid) would have anyway on a Moviola or a Steenbeck table to 80% re-cut, because the
offline Resolutiondas material level, ie that many cuts on the monitor look good on a canvas but not anymore.
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
and what is the difference if I cut s.PC or "cutting board"? Why are the cuts are no longer good? I would at Überlbendungen understand if perhaps on the screen provides a pixel, etc.
or is it simply the length of a scene that one sooner or later should be cut?
Many greetings,
Constantin
Antwort von Axel:
... or is it simply the length of a scene that one sooner or later should be cut? Probably it's the timing. No idea whether this observation is not just the mumbling of an old rabbit is and should be called: "We were, we were still feeling the cut. It was still really
cut." Eg If you ever cut narrow film did (reverse material, it intersects the original!), Then you know before you fast forward and back ten times before you make a cut, because this you can not undo. Perhaps you know the material better than someone who only revocable at any time eintippt Is and Os ...
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
whether this observation is not just the mumbling of an old hare is :-) Maybe she was das When I look at some ready-made movie, but I would be synonymous here and there a cut a few frames next to the front or rear. I just think that often it is totally a matter of taste, so just 1-2 frames stories. Maybe, but be that the cuts are not
directly considered as accurate.
(I'm always very rough cut and cut until later in the scene longer or shorter) I find it much more pleasant to know that it is revocable!
Many greetings
Constantin
Antwort von etch:
There are - whether in Hollywood or in Germany - on the one freaks the Page, with the new technologies before their s.liebsten On the market since work, and on the other, the nostalgic, a lot of the reasons may be why their proven system was better.
Most Hollywood movies are now nonlinear systems to cut, but some still prefer to trust their old cutting table. Each as he likes.
In the 80s and 90s we had the same issue on the question "typewriter or word processor?". Most writers are now working with the computer, but some still swear on their journey typewriters or even write of hand (if they are synonymous then someone must pay for its Gemurkse abtippt).
Today, a similar discussion in the Photography forum relating to "analog or digital" read. Who just firmly believe that analog Diafilm more contrast and a higher standard Resolutionals owns DSLR, its always nice images synonymous find.
But back to Hollywood: Much more interesting than the question of the editing system, I think the question of the overall workflow. There are quite different digital cinema recording systems, but all have some problems with lead, which is why most Hollywood movies have to be rotated film. However, you always learn more about the raw material to completely digitizer and a very s.Ende the chain back on to film (as opposed to functioning in earlier Effect shooting, where one considers only the effect of sequences of digitized material and the rest of analog processing has ). In addition to gradually draw first digital projectors in cinemas, so that synonymous wiedergabeseitig the renunciation of film material is predicted.
Antwort von Jürgen F.:
Dear "movie friends"
You Gugst Here:
http://www.geebroadcast.co.uk/LWKS/lwks_home.htm
Grüße Jürgen F
Antwort von etch:
Today, a similar discussion in the Photography forum relating to "analog or digital" read. Who just firmly believe that analog Diafilm more contrast and a higher standard Resolutionals owns DSLR, its always nice images synonymous find.
Sure you can have resolution as synonymous with the various video formats drüber dispute, which is here day in day is made.
But clearly in the analog photography is better, higher is the aperture size and color are clearly better. You can see that even if recordings of Sonneauf courses and-under with two systems. Here, the DSLR yet so good all the problems of heaven Nuacen present.
What is clear, you need the right movie and Lenses for good and for the two systems.
The analog film material is still the ultimate proof of us is indeed the film industry.
Antwort von cstuder:
And here you guckst synonymous:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_feature_films_edited_with_Final_Cut_Pro
Evt. There's such synonymous sites for other products.
christian