Frage von Flashlight:
Hello,
'm a little confused. In some contributions to the purchase of third-party DV codecs recommended) (Mainconcept, Canopus, etc..
I have my films have always with the Premiere Pro standard codec (DV-PAL 48kHz) captured.
Question: Are the differences between the codecs visible, that it is worth a different DV codec to use? I think mainly in qualitative terms.
If so, what recommendation had you (and especially why?).
Thanks.
Flashlight.
Antwort von wolfgang:
Feed to read:
http://videotreffpunkt.com/thread.php?threadid=644&boardid=24&page=1
And in this thread here you will find a lot of reading material in addition to even compare photos:
http://videotreffpunkt.com/thread.php?threadid=850&boardid=38&page=5
Antwort von Tobias Grendl:
On this subject a matter of synonymous to me.
There are of MainConcept both a DV codec as one synonymous DVC Pro (25/50) codec. The DVC Pro codec promises) better quality (lower compression, but is quite expensive.
Is this codec only DVC systems subject or I could capture on my Mini-DV recorded material with this codec?
MfG, Tobias.
Antwort von Strahlemann:
It would bring you nothing () except any marginal differences, since the material on your tape in DV compression already exists - that would be what you'd get it, you'd open the compressed DV stream and recompress.
Of the larger the space eg: DVCPro50 offers you would not be able to benefit, because you can not conjure up the difference values of DV (4:2:0 or 4:1:1) to DVCPro50 (4:2:2) can ".
Only masked out and alone on the DVCPro (if you have the necessary hardware) can be advantageous for example, compositing, or satisfy a broadcaster synonymous with DVCPro (because even with some DV still be ridiculed).
