Frage von EyTschej:
I have a lot rumgegooglet and synonymous here the search function, but no solution is found - presumably there has been synonymous not yet. Yet again, I wanted to ask - hope dies last ...
Under XP I could xvid shots that I wanted to edit with Premiere, the only way process that I find them as a DV encoded voted. To do this, I had the Panasonic DV codec and Virtual Dub. Under Vista (64bit) missing this codec for Virtual Dub. So I can not currently xvid files, so changing that I can edit with Premiere.
- Panasonic DV codec is installed correctly
- At the start of VirtualDub in XP SP2 mode, a number of additional codecs, but not the Panasonic DV
- Yes, I know: Why should the 32bit DV codec running under 64bit? The problem, however, needed a solution ...
32bit-system is a possibility, I know. But since the Microsoft boot process for a new Vista beastliness invade him, you can not just XP as secondary system. At least not without much effort ...
Therefore I'd like to see if there is a different DV codec that is under Vista 64bit in with VirtualDub works, or whether I use the xvid files in any other way can load premiere.
The error message is, moreover, that the clip is an unsupported audio rate. However, this is nonsense, because I'm the extra audio track was removed and only the video track as avi've saved. There is no audio available, so can not synonymous unsupported audio rate available ...
Presumably there are for Vista 64 yet still really no solution, I am afraid. Would natürtlich but very grateful if I get the opposite could prove;)
Antwort von Gast 0815:
The open source DV codec provides Cedocida probably 64bit support. Hompage: http://www.student.uni-kl.de/~dittrich/cedocida/#download
Ready compiled version: http://neuron2.net/misc/cedocida020.zip
No idea whether it is so synonymous in practice, have only 32bit systems.
Greetings from Marburg
Antwort von der_kleine_techniker:
Has anyone ever the http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/HuffYUV on a 64 bit system tested?
It would be preferable to a DV codec. One of them s.sollte XVID always represent the final format. From XVID again need to edit what should be avoided.
Antwort von Gast 0815:
Hello,
clearly would be a "lossless" codec better, but it's because the very old HuffYUV a 64bit version?
MS writes in any case, that this would be essential: "If you have a 64-bit version of Windows, you have to provide 64-bit codecs installed." (http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/windows/de-de/help/3d0c5a49-8f61-45cc-8a7d-38c4695ba9291031.mspx)
An alternative would be this, otherwise Lagarith (http://lags.leetcode.net/codec.html), of which an appropriate version exists.
Greetings from Marburg
Antwort von EyTschej:
The open source DV codec provides Cedocida probably 64bit support. Hompage: http://www.student.uni-kl.de/~dittrich/cedocida/#download
Ready compiled version: http://neuron2.net/misc/cedocida020.zip
A dream! Codec for Virtual Dub appeared on and I was then a xvid file to convert, that they synonymous with Premiere and running again. Makes me wonder that these 64-bit alternative to Google or not to be found - at least not as fast as the Panasonic DV codec can be found.
Sure, we should xvid normally used only as a final format, which I normally do synonymous. But was even before that I made some recordings archived zusammenschnippeln wanted. Also do I edit my videos already partially in between with Virtual Dub and it must be DV (ie lossless) can save before I then sometime the finale xvid-Compression elegant. It is an under-Virtual Dub functional DV codec synonymous so important for me.
So: problem solved. Hopefully can find other users with the same problem with Google and / or forums then search quickly to this thread and the answer here. I notice a huge stone from the heart.
Antwort von TheBubble:
Also do I edit my videos already partially in between with Virtual Dub and it must be DV (ie lossless) can save DV also uses a compression method verlustbehaftetetes.
Antwort von EyTschej:
Also do I edit my videos already partially in between with Virtual Dub and it must be DV (ie lossless) can save
DV also uses a compression method verlustbehaftetetes. Yes, but only very low. We do not want the Pope than the Pope's;)
