Frage von Hannsemann:
First of a hearty "Moin Moin" s.The slashCAM community: D
When I am talking about the following problem. I film my material currently with a SonyDCR-TRV15E and my material cut with the Pinnacle Liquid Edition. I'm working on dubbing material in the PC, the material and give it out as a DVD. Well, it looks after the post-production, but still just as "digital" from ... A well-known "music video producer" of the area turns its projects with Canon XL1s and his works do not see on television after IR but almost after film. These digital "Konbturen" are gone and the Picture is "round" ...
Now my question. What can I do in post production for my film is so synonymous "get around" to?
Thank you in advance for the help and send you all a very dear greetings from Hanover;)
Antwort von pennor:
Now my question. What can I do in post production for my film is so synonymous "get around" to? http://forum.slashcam.de/search.php type in the term "film look" field. Enjoy reading and try it.
Greeting
Holger
Antwort von pennor:
[quote = "Anonymous"]
http://forum.slashcam.de/search.php type in the term "film look" field. Enjoy reading and try it.
Forgotten: http://www.slashcam.de/artikel/Basics/Tips-zum-Filmlook-bei-der-Recording.html
Greeting
Holger
Antwort von jens:
In addition to all seekers still a good result here Introduction to
Hackermovies. Have fun, Jens
Antwort von Axel:
Hello Hansemann.
From lighting and lesser depth of synonymous (the latter a keyword with many 'hits') except for the
film look in Comparison to the
video look decisive, especially the fact that the Canon XL can record progressive images. What would you'd have to do with your material, it de-interlace, ie remove the interlaced with the 50 fields. Different Programs provide here different results in terms of picture quality and movement presentation. For example, if thrown away one field and the lack of
replicated, there are no problems with fast movements, but the image resolution is reduced almost by half. When the positions of the pixels of both fields and
interpolates a new full-screen comparison of the two, considers the loss of resolution within bounds, but there are at spinning wheels, tripping dog etc. strange stroboscopic effects, if you look at the whole thing
on a CRT TV. The best method is the interpolation with motion blur, which only one is of be given time to (a staggered 50stel seconds) next half frame shifted parts of the image with one Richtungsblur. Seeing these shots both on the calculator as synonymous on the TV as if they were included with 1 / 25 shutter speed. The "film" effect is shocking well made, looks like 16mm DV ...
Further details here:
http://www.100fps.com/
The de-interlace of normal DV footage is really only recommended if you want to put it on the Web. The down sampling of material with interlaced into small WMVs etc. do not get this special. To this end, perhaps the simplest version goes synonymous.
For the output on your DVD you need to be aware that you are in the absence of a progressive-Cam (in the two fields
be recorded
simultaneously) by de-interlacing take significant loss of quality in Purchase. So your DV footage is more "square" as a round! My advice is to get through good lighting and some subsequent color correction. To this end, there is a contribution
http://forum.slashcam.de/bessere-welt-auf-dv-vt30166.html?highlight=bessere+welt
With lesenswertem interview.
The most important thing: If you ever have a carefully-lighted stage with costumed and made-up actors have taken is clear to you that at least 90% of the effect of a picture, the significance of the motif itself constitutes. Therefore, away with all the envious glances at other techniques. First Pay attention to
what you films, only then,
how!
Antwort von Markus:
Hi All,
in "round" Video recordings, I first think s.The Kantenaufsteilung. If it is set too high, the images appear overly sharp edges on the video monitor. Less is sometimes more ...
Antwort von Hannsemann:
For now, many thanks for the many friendly and enthusiastic responses. Zim part these were very helpful.
The thing with the "film look" I already knew. To this end, it would be nice if you guys a fundamental "film look step-by-step tutorial" there:) Or is there already?
With the colors I've been playing around with - works very well ... Something out of saturation, contrast and something purely the Picture is already powerful "enough."
The real problem is unfortunately not yet solved, and certainly there IS a solution. The typical data-edges are still seeing strong and the very disturbing ... I worked with a blur ... The edges are indeed gone, but the film has blurred ........
There are no other options?
Antwort von derrettig:
Although it is technically not that great ... but my way:
The whole in After Effects (for the titling needed anyway), then there rausrechnen uncompressed and without fields. The product will only bring in the desired final format (Mpeg2, DV). Firstly, it is full frames, if synonymous with quality loss, on the other hand, the picture is vermatscht something. There were definitely impressed by all the spectators look great. In the first place in "Young Media 2005"
