Frage von alexginter:
Did my question yesterday in a slightly different form (http://forum.slashcam.de/dvd-auto-schlechte-qualitat-vt64296.html)
I was not delivering the desired results because I have too little expertise in this area have. Therefore a second test:
At a trade fair should be on his plasma screen (1365 x 768), a film running
I wrote in After Effects with 1024 x 576've created.
Must run of DVD, the film must be looped.
The quality / Resolutionso well as possible.
Ne normal DVD with 576 x 720 looks too bad. I can not get any higher dissolved?
If not, how do I s.besten prior to the DVD with 576 x 720 at least in the highest quality of style? My previous approach was not optimal, see my previous post (http://forum.slashcam.de/dvd-auto-schlechte-qualitat-vt64296.html)
Antwort von thos-berlin:
Your (lack of) expertise is beyond question again synonymous with no other results.
On a DVD is a PAL-compliant video Resolutionvon me a 720 x 576 pixels. If the disc is therefore on a standard DVD player to be played, there is no other way / Resolution.
Whether DVD player play other formats in other Resolutionabpielen the synonymous and may still in impeccable technical quality, eludes my knowledge. It is however not synonymous to a DVD in a technical sense, but a disk with a file in the format xyz.
A better Resolutionist with Blue-ray is possible. Then, you need to get a blues synonymous-ray player (or a Playstation), so that the disc on the television can be displayed.
Of these different standards format, you can usually only play on a PC.
Antwort von alexginter:
ok, so the resolution is not higher.
Perhaps a tip as I the DVD at least for people in good quality?
Antwort von Meggs:
At a trade fair should be on his plasma screen (1365 x 768), a film running
I wrote in After Effects with 1024 x 576've created.
Must run of DVD, the film must be looped.
The quality / Resolutionso well as possible.
Must run of DVD is not necessarily "must be of standalone DVD player play."
Can the DVD synonymous in a DVD drive of a notebook located?
Antwort von Meggs:
Ich hab mir mal read your old thread.
The upscaling of your AE project on the subsequent screen resolution and then back to Pal runterskalieren is of course nonsense.
The best give your AE project as it is in 1024 x 576 square pixels, such as uncompressed Quicktime from the walk with a good MPEG encoder into a 720 x 576 widescreen and standard DVD mach ne draus.
Antwort von Daigoro:
ok, so the resolution is not higher.
Perhaps a tip as I the DVD at least for people in good quality? s.nicht 100 times out and her account of how you've done so far.
-> Once in a dissolution process in the final resolution for the DVD to convert.
b) a maximum of 60 minutes per 4.7 GB DVD - better less. Either the data manual at around 7-8MBit / s, or the burning program to make car.
c) a DVD player with upscaling to use (HMDI output) - such as better models of Toshiba s.150 euros.
d) the whole stuff and forget an ASUS Terminator T3 M3N8200 with a little hard drive, small Athlon x2 Processor for ~ 250 euros to take play.
Antwort von Axel:
At a trade fair should be on his plasma screen (1365 x 768), a film running
I wrote in After Effects with 1024 x 576've created.
Must run of DVD, the film must be looped.
The quality / Resolutionso well as possible.
Ne normal DVD with 576 x 720 looks too bad. I can not get any higher dissolved? As already described in the next thread: A DVD irritates HDready Resolutiondes although not plasma, but the
achievable quality is still respectable. Your workflow is counter-productive.
Simple: In AAE as a DV PAL anamorphic work (better than before).
Complicated, but better: As the "animation" with square pixels (1024 x 576) output. Re-import and re-export to DV PAL, and this film s.iDVD send.
With FinalCutStudio did you's easier. Even the animations you could do in Motion, which is not a full substitute for AAE, but everything annoying ex-and importing deleted.
Antwort von alexginter:
Thanks for the help!
So that the high - and runterscalen nonsense I now have even come in the spirit;)
iDVD is synonymous not just the tool of my choice, would prefer to Encore.
to buy now can I no longer need film out at noon today
Thank you!
Antwort von Axel:
Encore? On a Mac? Sounds a step back, a side, a back, perhaps a genetic disposition on your part, a passion, everything is so complicated as possible.
Antwort von alexginter:
Well, low drip and I thought an authoring tool would be good of Adobe After Effects to work together with ... How do I get just because it?
Axel, give your offense even with something useful on the road and me to clarify why it is so difficult and what would be better.
Antwort von Axel:
Axel, give your offense even with something useful on the road and me to clarify why it is so difficult and what would be better. The editing program is the center of the video editing. From there, everything takes its beginning, and so the integration must be true. So you need to Encore CS3 (or CS4) completely.
FinalCutStudio costs 1100 ¬, and FinalCut itself and Compressor and DVD Studio Pro are better than Premiere, Media Encoder and the Encore. Adobes cream cuts AAE you obviously.
Now, you could say: Well, but so is the seamless integration of Final Cut Pro and AAE do not, I can not for example, the timeline from Final Cut Pro, simply open AAE. However, you can:
Automatic Duck, it costs
here
Add to "insult": I apologize in any form.
Antwort von Meggs:
So you need to Encore CS3 (or CS4) completely.
...
FinalCutStudio costs 1100 ¬, and FinalCut itself and Compressor and DVD Studio Pro are better than Premiere, Media Encoder and the Encore. Adobes cream cuts AAE you obviously.
For the use of Encore you need except the rendered movie nothing. Premiere CS3 includes Encore CS3. Premiere works perfectly together with After Effects. Whether it is better than FinalCut Premiere - perhaps taste or habituation question.
