Frage von brendan:
Hello!
a current S-ATA II disk creates eijen throughput in sizes of 80-90MB / s [1], S-ATA II provides bus with his limit at 300 MByte / s is still plenty of space. Plenty of room for additional hard drives in a RAID 0 group. Up to 4 panels would therefore possible, then the bus is full.
Only - what makes sense for DV editing?
Slightly older hard disks supplied only about 40 MB / s - it is a current partial plate from the RAID0 older superior.
So, how much throughput you need for DV editing? The more the better - but get 180 MB / s really an improvement compared to 90MB / s?
[1] http://anonym.to/?http://www.hartware.de/review_791_6.html
Regards, Brendan
Antwort von brendan:
difficult to ask? ;)
Antwort von tommyb:
Nope. If you would like files out and copy her, you need more bandwidth.
If you normally cut, then just so much that the video can be played fluently.
DV = 25MBit / s: 8 = 3.125 MB / s
That means you can synonymous of very fast USB stick cut.
Antwort von Markus:
difficult to ask? ;) Perhaps missing potential donors still answer an important claim:
"HD" means ... (<- link).
Antwort von brendan:
oh, since missing the V.
HDV of course!
Antwort von Markus:
Only - what makes sense for DV editing? In this case you can with the same data rate as expected in IR, ie in terms of HDD data throughput, the computer is not powerful. Then again it depends of your needs, for example, how many video tracks to be played (eg PiP Effects). The next bottleneck in several HDV videos could then be returned to the processor ...
Antwort von the_count:
HDV is absolutely no problem, only when digi-beta fade will need raid, and synonymous only if the old or plates are full. plates are inside (when nearly full), only about 2 / 3 as fast as the outside. better still: the clips you gegenschneidest on 2 non-raid disks are distributed, there is less tearful in case of accident
