Frage von Takuma:
Hi folks,
kann mir jemand mal Picture difference (image quality) between a cam and a HDD with Mini-DV Cam ongoing explain?
If so, the picture is very big difference?
Wants to buy me a camera, but I know things are not so handy.
I thank you in advance.
LG
PS if somebody Camera "SonyDCR SR 32" knows, he can give me advice or would he prefer to advise me?
Thanks again
Antwort von Chezus:
S.Picture a difference to recognize is difficult. The differences you can see only when moving pictures and, if necessary after editing.
Images with low resolution vision synonymous only complains ... from when they enlagre
Antwort von Takuma:
S.Picture a difference to recognize is difficult. The differences you can see only when moving pictures and, if necessary after processing moving pictures? - That is but the film, right?
Because I was once said that a mini-DV provides a better picture when filming ... but I think me, both the HDD & Mini DV "look good, and one does not see a quality loss,,,
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
The image quality depends of the data from. With DV video, this 25Mbit/sec.
For your Sony Model: HQ (9 Mbps) / SP (6 Mbps) / LP (3 Mbps)
You will see that the data on the HDD camcorder much more compressed. This s.Qualität you lose.
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
The second would be, I'm going to recommend a 3CCD camcorder to choose, as they have a much higher sharpness in comparison to 1CCD have. The price should be fit. Show times since at Panasonic.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... I would you recommend a 3CCD camcorder to choose, as they have a much higher sharpness in comparison to 1CCD have. The tip is okay, but with the sharpness has less to do: The three sensors have a positive impact on the Color performanceaus.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) But I think me, both the HDD & Mini DV "look good, and one does not see a quality loss,,, Can you give me this time closer to logic? You've probably incorrect assumptions. The Picture of hard camcorder is a bit worse. And after editing, it will still mauer.
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
... I would you recommend a 3CCD camcorder to choose, as they have a much higher sharpness in comparison to 1CCD have.
The tip is okay, but with the sharpness has less to do: The three sensors have a positive impact on the Color performanceaus.
Gruß Bernd E. Hello Bernd,
since the light through a filter is held before it reaches the CCD brightness information to be 4 pixels together. For the color even 8 pixels, it is the sharpness with 3CCD chips, 4 X and the larger color 8 x even as high as 1CCD models
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
The image quality depends of the data from. With DV video, this 25Mbit/sec. I believe it was not easy!
Antwort von Eva Maier:
Is not it so that when Avi with bits and with Mpeg with Byts counts?
/ E
Antwort von Hollgo:
How to calculate what is actually Pieper, hauptsache it is true in the result.
DV-AVI has a fairly strict standard data transfer rate of 4MB / s, So these are (1 byte = 8 bits) 4 MB / s * 8 = about 25 Mbit / s, if you will.
The indication in MB in AVI has somehow "burnt into" the talk but not against a claim in bits when s.Ende's true.
However, this data in DV AVI, as described, fixed, so that the resulting data in the DV-AVI field no differences in terms of image quality should occur.
In MPEG1/2/4 sees the situation differently, however, that here has usnatürlich synonymous the bitrate of an MPEG affect the image quality to be achieved.
DV-AVI and MPEG1/2/4 are due to the bit rate is difficult to assess.
When the MPEG2 encoder synonymous plays an important role. Also saves DV AVI to MPEG2, in contrast, every single frame recorded from. MPEG is always just a picture frame (I-frame) is stored and also the scene in this photograph image content (BP Frame).
For each I-frame includes a sequence of B-and P-frames, which can vary in length.
More to MPEG is certainly synonymous in this forum s.anderer place. Not only compares apples with pears.
