Frage von Raban:
Hello!
I would like to see like the Tripod 755B including the video head Manfrotto 701RC2 of growth.
Now I saw that the 755B tripod with the provider Objektivo cheap place. However, there is a weight of 3.5 n.angegeben, however, where the Manfrotto Products Catalog 2.8 n.angegeben is! Can someone explain to me?
Confused synonymous me that if I understood correctly, in the catalog of the Manfrotto 2005, the Video Head 701RC2 Tripod 755B emphohlen to be in the current catalog and nothing more. Maybe someone knows if the video head 701RC2 to optimally fit the 755B Tripod?
I would be very happy to have an early reply, because I would like to begin during the holidays, a film and do not want to do wrong.
Already many thanks for any answers
Gruss Raban
PS: Websites:
Objektivo:
http://www.objektivo.de/oxid.php/sid/b76dc5f6fdb6e648b5c944237b53a47f/cl/details/anid/f3c44bbad31d46d21.35277658/Manfrotto-MDeVe- Video Tripod-Aluminum-755-B / / listtype / search
The product catalog can be found on the main page of Manfrotto on "Products" and then under "New Video Catalogs 2006/2007" on Page 32
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
Germany as representatives of Lino Manfrotto - Bogen Imaging synonymous of 6.17 ibs = 2.8 Kg speaks, it must be assumed that the website made a mistake.
Antwort von pezi:
The price is different but synonymous!
Antwort von Jan:
Ok, I have personal experience but synonymous with 055er, 190er Tripod and the 525 in conjunction with 501er and 700 / 701er head.
525er Set I do not know whether the header already exists, the cost was so synonymous.
Ok it is definitely more expensive, I had hoped for 580 ¬ a 503 / 525er set to recommend.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Jan:
Here's a useful tip Slashcam Manfrotto
Antwort von Raban:
Thanks for the replies and useful tips. This goes in this forum is really very fast. Compliment!
I believe, however, the 525er set is too expensive for my use. Do you not think that the 701ner enough to make a "hobby-movie" to turn? Because I have absolutely no professional film, one should simply smooth pans right. Provides you with the 701ner or should I already have a 500 vote?
Already thanks in advance
Gruss Raban
Antwort von Jan:
Hello Raban,
for hobby like shooting ranges from the very secure.
I often stop filme synonymous with loud music, then a heavy 525 Tripod simply necessary, because otherwise you 755er with 701er "weghüpft". I like the work of synonymous and the amount of soil spider 525er.
For consumer cameras do not need 501 / 503er her head, I think the 700 / 701 head is sufficient. Once the camera but in the class DM Canon XM 2 / SonyVX 2100 / FX 7 / XH A 1 goes, it is already superior, synonymous because of the better surface.
Yes 701er the head is not bad, which shift s.Tripod have even some expensive heads do not even - not bad.
It should be but for a real consumer desire nor the Velbon DV 7000 (yes I know now to 569 times) then,
more value for money is synonymous for 200 ¬ not. Fluid effect for horizontal & vertical adjustable means spider, etc.
The low height is a minus point is not exactly how the firm anchoring of the head. For Manfrotto or Gitzo heads through the 3 extra screws again secured, so that they can not turn off. This is the DV 7000 is not as a fixed set of horizontal fluid can effect the whole head. The head before really turning (tongs) or stick would be a tip.
A really interesting Tripod for only 120 ¬.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Raban:
Thank you, this has really helped me.
Because I remember at the moment none of the aforementioned cameras to buy. Thus would the 701ner enough.
That with the Velbon DV 7000 I ask myself yet again.
Gruss Raban
