Frage von videofreund23:
Hi,
embellish my home with something, I wanted a digital picture frame s.die wall hanging of pictures and videos going.
Now I've found it here at amazon:
http://www.amazon.de/Intenso-Mediacreator-Bilderrahmen- video-Function Remote control/dp/B003U3W4AI/ref = sr_1_1? Ie = UTF8 & qid = 1295252456 & sr = 8-1
85 with a bit much, because I received so little more money for a flat TV with Media Player function.
Does anyone have any tips for me?
Antwort von Jott:
Why are steep 85 euros? Apart from that, what do you want with a 4:3 screen? Only retro play videos?
Antwort von videofreund23:
mh yes 4:3 I have not even considered ... should already be 16:9,
then would be a 26 or less inch lcd media player with probably the better
Antwort von videofreund23:
oh, just with the lady of the house said, and such a monitor s.der wall they do not want ... Therefore, it is probably somewhere between 7 and 8 inches, 20 cm I have available.
anyone have any idea which model I should take as
Antwort von Jan:
Hi,
the run on digital photo frame is now almost over. Many of these devices would gift recipient does not, the withdrawal rate is enormous. In principle, only for lazy art, retired and on the desktop controller.
Almost every new HDTV has either a USB input or an SDHC slot for photos and videos in a much better quality. On the computer you can still see his paintings synonymous.
Even worse is the video playback, the company passed to many video compression, but my older codecs. As a result, the example almost no frame (Sony Can there at the top device) AVCHD video (the most used nowadays) can read what is classified as synonymous MPEG 4th So try necessarily video!
Often view the elderly under MPEG 4 variants such as ASP or very often MJPEG videos of digicams, such as Canon, Panasonic and Fuji eg used very often.
Then the aspect ratio issue, many digital cameras have factory set 4:3, a square frame but it looks silly. Those looking at his 4:3 images on a 16:9 frame then experiences some other surprises (dilations and black edges) ... Philips is displaying images of 4:3 to 16:9 frame quite well on it.
Intenso is more of a "low mark", the leading firms (image quality) are Sony, Philips and Samsung (as already synonymous with the television).
A simple resolution says nothing about the picture, then you notice when looking at who the best contrast, best color quality, the best focus, the lowest reflection in the light, the best viewing angle (not only of the front) has.
And then one is very often the case with the three companies mentioned, 10-inch model with video playback but will cost ¬ 150 fastest upstream.
VG
January
