Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Here is the news message with links and images on the pages slashCAM Magazine
Antwort von grovel:
Who this discussion is simply dismisses as trivial the debate is not grown.
Academic-bashing is now so big in fashion, and it is synonymous quite understandable if you do not understand why seemingly simple questions provide much material for discussion - but I expect of a web magazine as slashCAM, that it is not cheap moves on this level.
For a practical Filmmakers the question of the ontological truth of the picture may seem simplistic and banal, but at least it is precisely this question of what the philosophical dimensions of the 20 Century has occupied (Deleuze, Merleau-Ponty, etc.).
Thanks for the link.
SeeYa grovel
Antwort von Axel:
In March 2001, in America this
pilot to the Fox TV series
Lone Gunmen
at all.
How to explain now that it produced in 2000 gives a TV movie in which Boeing into the World Trade Center controlled one is to provide a pretext for a "war against terror"? How to explain it without a "conspiracy to the highest echelons of government" to accept?
There are pictures! Communication is via images. The WTC was the strongest picture of international capitalism, its violation existed in the minds of both his supporters and his opponents. The whole scenario was already part of the collective consciousness that it was realized later or earlier, very likely. That there is a gun lobby, after the end of the East-West wrangling was looking for a new enemy: Who would argue?
Images are not innocent. We take pictures to be true (It is measured not only reversed, but simply wrong to say, to, images could be "the truth" shows). They form just does not, they shape our Picture of the past, present, yes, and even the future. Who produces images that maintains one of the strongest tools or one of the strongest weapons in their hands.
your thoughts, for they become words. Watch your words, for they become actions. Watch your actions, for they become habits. Watch your habits, for they become your character. Watch your character, for it becomes your destiny.
Anders: Also, who starts with the best intent to document objective facts, will come to the point (or with choosing a topic already with this starting point, begin) to make a choice. Only then receives the documentation of weight, but already so it loses its claim to be objective.
The techniques of recording, the article calls the "I do not by nature different. Whispers in times before the letter, stone tablets in ancient chroniclers, still image, film, video, if the content looks to fade out all differences.
