Frage von Neo2006:
Hello once,
I plan for my Canon XH A1 an additional, new, buy microphone.
It should be operated via XLR and not use the Photo shoe.
Some topics in this and other forums I've read here I have found two mono-directional microphones that are in my price range:
Rode NTG-2-
-Beyerdynamic MCE 86 S II
Does anyone have these two microphone in use, recommendations or suggestions?!
Apparently, most directional microphones can not easily fit into the microphone holder of the Canon XH A1. To this end I have an adapter, the company Rode Model: SM5
Antwort von Johannes:
I know of only two microphones to see and would argue that they both play in a league. I have time for, the third in a bunch, decided the Sennheiser ME66. Respectively. had as yet a second Micro AKG C586EB which was just as good, if not more specific.
As for your support problem, so far I only know the Panasonic microphone holders, which stuck the microphones without additional help.
with other cameras I have a foam cubes with cut and clamped into the holder and then it was usually synonymous quite well.
Antwort von srone:
rode the bracket is certainly good, but because of the additional building impractical, I use s.der XHA1 in vebindung with a Sennheiser MKH-416, moosgummifahrradlenkerbezug fits exactly onto micro and stuck well in the bracket, 2 pcs approx 50cm there is a bicycle dealer in need for 7.95 ¬ you will be a piece about 5cm long, so you have to all existing microscopic and the rest of your life safe hands ;-)
lg
SRone
Antwort von rush:
I NTG-1 s.einer Panasonic Camera have in use. It is shorter than the NTG-2 and therefore came to me more in question.
It fits easily into the bracket of my camera. The Sennheiser MKH416 other hand, was too thin and would have described as used with separate bracket or thickened with Mosogummi "must be";)
How thick / thin is the Canon holder, I do not know
Antwort von Neo2006:
rode the bracket is certainly good, but because of the additional building impractical, I use s.der XHA1 in vebindung with a Sennheiser MKH-416, moosgummifahrradlenkerbezug fits exactly onto micro and stuck well in the bracket, 2 pcs approx 50cm there is a bicycle dealer in need for 7.95 ¬ you will be a piece about 5cm long, so you have to all existing microscopic and the rest of your life safe hands ;-)
lg
SRone Thanks for the tip!
How do the recordings to handling noise - these are tolerable?
Antwort von Neo2006:
I NTG-1 s.einer Panasonic Camera have in use. It is shorter than the NTG-2 and therefore came to me more in question.
It fits easily into the bracket of my camera. The Sennheiser MKH416 other hand, was too thin and would have described as used with separate bracket or thickened with Mosogummi "must be";)
How thick / thin is the Canon holder, I do not know Have you compared the two Microsystems and as for are your experience?
Antwort von TheDrummer:
I have a RODE NTG-2 s.der Canon XH-A1 in action:
Shotgun microphone s.der Canon XH-A1
Antwort von Auf Achse:
Hello!
The XH A1 has an original accessory adhesive foam - foam rubber strips to the diameter enlarge it. I have not stuck over the Micro because it looks gruesome if I sometimes take the Micro out of position. I have opened and the micro-holder's glued the foam DA.
As Micro I can recommend the Sennheiser ME64 (cardioid) with power adapter K6P. The K6P works exclusively with Phantom (use limited by it), but has the advantage that it is not always the Micro-and one must turn off .... Batteries and replace the empty because you have forgotten times ....
Regards,
On axis
Antwort von nicecam:
The XH A1 has an original accessory adhesive foam - foam rubber strips to the diameter enlarge it. Really? You mean of course, the XH-A1
s, for my XH-A1 had
no s not like that.
Well, I work synonymous with foam rubber in order to my Sennheiser ME66 can use.
Better yet is (its for a good sound), the Rode SM5. At best, the Micro is one of the camera down and caught the sound separately.
Because:
How do the recordings to handling noise - these are tolerable? Handle noise is at least in the Sennheiser ME66 - I'd say "grenzlegal.
The camera must be held quietly. However, the micro top.
However, the Micro (because of additional power adapter needed) twice as expensive as the intended good synonymous Rode NTG-2, is where I flirted with before I bought the Sennheiser ME66 favorable.
Antwort von Auf Achse:
I did not know that only the XH-A1s the foam it has .... na must somehow justify the higher price Canon yes ;-)
The Rode SM 5 decoupled certainly better than the foam, I give you right. However, you can capture synonymous with the microphone cable contact noise, but not synonymous helps the SM5.
On axis
Antwort von srone:
the benefit of the handles of my bike posted moosgummiteil consists in the fact that they can be mounted on the tubular micro and removed, in contrast to the enclosed, self-adhesive, which facilitates the use of different microscopic and strong ev synonymous maintain their resale value.
I have to handle noises with no problems, the normal handling required.
lg
SRone
Antwort von Auf Achse:
The tubular handle a bike one can at least runternehmen at any time. The bonded things you often runterreissen every time when you have to replace the Battery.
The foam is glued so miserably looked at my brand new ME64 that I absolutely had to come up with something! Acoustically it has seen no preference whether the foam s.Micro or sticks in the holder, MIR but not that disturbs my aesthetic sensibilities!
On axis
Antwort von Riccho:
So I have a Sennheiser ME-66 s.der XH-A1
While in use and only with spider:
http://www.thomann.de/de/mikrofon_spinnen.html
and although the Rode SM 5 spider.
Only good results.
Regards
Antwort von nicecam:
I just have a strip of foam rubber and bent into a ring with Gaffa tape sealed.
Sun Microsystems slipped over and inserted into the holder, the Micro will be nice tightened.
Antwort von rush:
[Quote = "Neo2006"]
Have you compared the two Microsystems and as for are your experience? No - I have the MKH416 directly with each other and not NTG-1 compared.
I had the 416er much on the hook in use - later the MKH60.
The audio conductor version of the MKH416 I was with phantom power adapter on but then a ticking too big s.der Henkel small camera - and therefore it was for reasons of cost and compact size of an NTG-1. The latter I've only used as a pure atmospheric Microphone - so far all I can still make any qualitative statements.
