Frage von tehaix:Good Afternoon Folks,
I thought to myself, so Fred with general tips that you use the camcorder to use, it is actually not bad. Totally unselfish.
Almost.
Because actually has just rausgestellt that I think the next few days but now with an EX1 will be working, not with an FX1, as adopted. The coarsest try out myself, but I'm interested in some things:
1. What exactly is it with the rolling shutter effect on what is and is to be avoided? Have so far only with CCD cameras worked, this problem probably do not have. I would like to own everything anlesen, but is already shooting begins tomorrow and today I have little time: (
2. I read data via USB A? War in any case the only enclosed data cable. Firewire would get a speed bonus?
3. Filming is actually for the web. Therefore, I wanted to progressive filming. Now the material is probably still have some open channel broadcast. So 1080i is the more suitable choice?
4. Can the Cam Full-HD material to SD synonymous convert? So a la FX1? I will of course initially test whether the full Resolutionim part of the "editable" (creative neologism), but I am afraid that my laptop because in the knees (2duo core, 2.4 GHz, 3GB ram, Edius, gf8600) -- or can anyone now say "Klaaaar runs."?
5. There are things you can do with the cam should be aware? Any significant properties, positively or negatively?
I know lots of issues that arise with little time spent searching even synonymous well would leave. But as I said, the time is very short, so a little help would be super. Apart from that, the thread of course, synonymous to collect genrell of Dos & Don'ts used.
Requests Have a nice Monday:)
Antwort von tehaix:
So,
now I can even answer some questions: D
You should avoid flash thunderstorm. This is something I've never seen, and I think it is for a 6000-euro-Cam unreasonable, that the complete picture white lights, when the photographer next door, pressed his shutter. Is this problem somehow umgehbar?
The display is fantastic. As I said earlier, the FX1 auspackte, I thought, that lens would be smeared. Here I was only on the razor sharp Picture of EX1-Desplays spoils. Even with excellent sunlight.
Picture is very good, if the finger of the automatics can. The autofocus does not work particularly fast, lots of pumps and other unpleasant things. Expected but with a cam of this class is not particularly relevant.
The on-off switch is an affront. Wellbeing of the haptics her the biggest shortcoming.
The swivel grip is actually very practical. However, the cam with me a little game, guess times that hardly avoid it.
And finally: The data I have at Expresscardslot and the Sony XDCAM own program and then simply imported by drag & drop into Edius Bin thrown. Very pleasant to work.
Perhaps that someone is interested: D
Antwort von domain:
.. I think it is for a 6000-euro-Cam unreasonable, that the complete picture white lights, when the photographer next door, pressed his shutter. Is this problem somehow umgehbar?
Have you never been corresponding sequences seen on television? That it is perfectly normal. The halt is a frame for the photographer next to you and for you not lit, so you can live with.
For single fanatic is more worse that CMOS only a portion of the frame is completely overexposed. Stört usually the same or just as a fully overexposed frame, but could be sustained at Stroboskopbeleuchtung in discos to something strange effects.
Antwort von tehaix:
Let's just say this: While watching, because I have probably less respected drauf:)
And I do live in so yes ... but it was already partially VERY funny. I can not remember such a thing ever to have seen.
Antwort von robbie:
I can not remember such a thing ever to have seen. In every news broadcast around 50x.
Antwort von Jogi:
Let's just say this: While watching, because I have probably less respected drauf:)
And I do live in so yes ... but it was already partially VERY funny. I can not remember such a thing ever to have seen. Is it synonymous with your FX1 GWES be no different and is quite normal.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... Is it synonymous with your FX1 GWES not otherwise be ... The FX1 has this problem is not because they do not have CMOS sensors.
Antwort von Jogi:
... Is it synonymous with your FX1 GWES not otherwise be ...
The FX1 has this problem is not because they do not have CMOS sensors. This is a frame (long flash) is brightened is normal. That is synonymous the function of the flash. That is no preference whether a Cam with CMOS or CCD works!
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... This is a frame (long flash) is brightened is normal ... no preference whether a Cam with CMOS or CCD works ... The of some perceived as a disruptive effect on CMOS-based camcorders that are not the whole picture (such as CCD), but only a part of it is to lighten the Flash - and this is a peculiarity of the CMOS sensors.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Transfer via USB, not via Firewire. XDCAM EX can not be transferred via firewire.
Antwort von Jogi:
Transfer via USB, not via Firewire. XDCAM EX can not be transferred via firewire. Can only be HDV-compatible material spend.
Antwort von tehaix:
Is it synonymous with your FX1 GWES be no different and is quite normal. Now that I think about it, I was never with the FX1 in flash thunderstorm situations. Because you're right. Will I try it on occasion. I understand the technical background between CMOS and CCD are not completely honest - might be because I've never busy. I can only give a subjective impression, and he was really in the EX1 anything but positive. In a DVX100 flashlights came to me before, much less annoying: /
Antwort von Jogi:
Your DVX100 is a DV Cam and operates intra frame coded with which each frame is encoded. Also, the Resolutionbei HD (V) is up to 6x higher. This has the DVX100 still a CCD image sensor with fewer vulnerabilities that come to bear.
The FX1 as synonymous with the EX1 work the MPEG2 codec (inter frame). These are a comparative analysis of image (I-frame), only the changes in the next pictures (P + B frames) coded.
Now, the FX1 has a small 1 / 4 "CCD sensor and the EX1 a great 1 / 2" CMOS chip. CCD and CMOS will still out differently. But on this issue has already been (synonymous in this forum) lot. Use the search times!
Antwort von PowerMac:
The FX1 has no 1 / 4 "chip.
Antwort von jazzy_d:
Especially, the EXS 3 pieces 1 / 2 "CMOS!
When Swiss TV SF, entire productions (Fernweh credible was the example) with the EX1 or EX3 made (of the electronics since yes no preference). At the Sony Expierience NEN has a lecture, which has a large HDCAM so .- CHF 150,000 and an EX1 and he says that he often likes EX1 takes the place of the big.
An absolutely great feature (Th) are the EXS Shoot-Transitions. Another, which other manufacturer obviously better resolved, profiles on the memory card to your PC / MAC to bring back synonymous and to be able to play, but always only one.
So much of my theoretical knowledge of the EX :-)
Antwort von Jogi:
The FX1 has no 1 / 4 "chip. Sorry, of course, 1 / 3 "chip and 3 of them!
@ jazzy_d,
synonymous the EX1 3 1 / 2 "chips, I have known of course synonymous.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... can only give a subjective impression, and he was really in the EX1 anything but positive. When I came to a DVX100 flashlights far less annoying before ... This is of me that s.genau above mentioned difference between CCD and CMOS. Here is a very instructive to see video test, which says more than many words: http://www.trainingvideographers.com/tipsandtricks.html
The rolling shutter effect suggests s.ungefähr half of the video duration, which is the beginning of Lowlightvergleich Panasonic HMC150 (CCD) and SonyZ5 (CMOS) dedicated.
Antwort von tehaix:
The rolling shutter effect suggests s.ungefähr half of the video duration, which is the beginning of Lowlightvergleich Panasonic HMC150 (CCD) and SonyZ5 (CMOS) dedicated. Thank you, exactly what I said. And I have expressed myself wrong. Not the whole picture is overexposed (in fact, what would be normal), but simply a half and completely moving "white". Had me for a no-go criterion for the purchase of this (otherwise excellent) Camera. So, I'm reading times. Would like to know where this could happen.