Frage von eberhard:
Hello,
Has anyone with experience of Canon EF lenses? I own the EOS 350 D with the Tamron 18-200 and wanted me may be a EF Lens growth. Now is certainly a one-time purchase. For zoom lenses like the EF, it is because with the energy data (differences in analog / digital camera) you need any adapter for the EOS? Is there any equivalent yet Lenses?
I personally think the Tamron 18-200 is only for the Fast, but not necessarily what's the detail.
Yours sincerely, Eberhard
Antwort von stefan preuhs:
Hello,
Has anyone with experience of Canon EF lenses? I own the EOS 350 D with the Tamron 18-200 and wanted me may be a EF Lens growth. Now is certainly a one-time purchase. For zoom lenses like the EF, it is because with the energy data (differences in analog / digital camera) you need any adapter for the EOS? Is there any equivalent yet Lenses?
I personally think the Tamron 18-200 is only for the Fast, but not necessarily what's the detail.
Yours sincerely, Eberhard Hi Eberhard,
all canon eos ef lenses are compatible. you just need to extend the focal length of 1.6 into account. means, for example, that a small 50mm lens, eos digital s.einer (except eos 5 d) 80mm equivalent. an adapter, there are not synonymous, and will not be needed.
EF 80-200 IS USM 2.8 of canon for example costs around 1,400 ¬, is about 600g of very difficult and full quality. Tamron and comes around the corner and offers an even greater focal length range for under ¬ 250 to? there may be something not right.
of a 18-200, I can only advise you. no vendor can make this focal length range of high quality and affordable present. it sounds tempting - but it is precisely scrap.
I recommend you the following purchases for the perfect equipment:
- 1 normal with fixed focal length objective (eg the excellent EF 50mm 1.8 II: 99 - ¬)
- 1 wide angle lens (28mm less)
- 1 telephoto lens (above 150mm)
you decide how you like. I wish you only warn against disappointment. if the Tamron and / or sigmas with 18-200mm of the 199 - ¬ looks, you think fast: "how cool is that." But believe me. no profit or demanding hobby photographer uses these cucumbers. it is simply not technically possible, such a large focal length range without error herzustellen.ganz apart from that things are terribly slow and noisy.
wonderful holidays
stefan preuhs
www.stefanpreuhs.com
Antwort von eberhard:
Thank you first for the answer I have already thought of something.
Will I possibly the Canon EF 17-85 Lens buy.
I hope it is a good interim solution cost around 500 ¬ and
has an optical stabilizer and as the focal of 27 - 135 mm
of the retail aspect. Most of the pictures I do like it
says so on the fast, because is not always a tripod, etc. and
if there's something darker you quickly some blur.
It is hoped to hold more such purchases to buy the thing?
Eberhard
Antwort von YourMajesty:
I just synonymous times:
The 50 1.8-II is the price / performance ratio is certainly ok, but in combination with the AF of the 350D but rather a matter of luck. The AF meets s.and too I would say. I producers Combined with this a lot but s.Ausschuss. 1.8 is synonymous only be used as open anything too soft. Dim to 2.2 brings major improvements here.
As you can I zoom the 70-200 4L heartily, if you light enough 4. The results are simply gorgeous. Enter this lens is no longer her.
For concerts or similar situations would be the IS version, either the 4L IS or the 2.8 L IS offering. Personally, I have the IS, however, never misses and it is rumored that the non-IS version of the imaging performance NEN tick forward, because at no additional lens elements vernaut be.
For Wide Angle Would I use the kit can be shard.
As always would be synonymous top the Tamron 28-75 suitable. If you have a good copy erwischt the results are very personable. Applies to any Lens - Series scatterings unfortunately there is quite often and many. Wide Angleist s.ner 1.6 crop camera he did not more ...
If you have a lens can test, you should make synonymous.
If the 200 was not long enough, perhaps with telephoto converter or 100-400 then a 4L IS.
Hatte ne time the 28-105 4L s.meiner Cam - especially the zoom range was very nice.
On my Cam, but the 70-200 was the sharpest lens - defying zoom is sharper than my 50s.
Greeting
Tom
Antwort von Jan:
That is all very beautiful, 90% a 350 or 400 D & D 40 & 50 for 500-600 ¬ set times not stop 500-1000 ¬ for Optics out.
Physical law is clear that the more lenses, the more the light spreads s.Ende, which in turn worsens the contrast and sharpness. No matter how well the company is 7 lenses are compared to 14 lenses almost always have the advantage.
But there are good examples of how synonymous the difficult months since Nikon 18-200 VR available for 750 bells, which for me D 200 customers often purchased. The people who were synonymous, the D 200 as a secondary housing for their D2 Xs have used - the photographer, the Money synonymous with their pictures deserve. I asked synonymous always amazed - the ranges Optics them really? The well confirmed None returned the good reputation of the 18-200 VR.
And it is not uncommon that the cheap plastic Bomber for Canon & Nikon - I speak of the original ¬ 100-200 lenses (18-55, 70-300 plastic ring) partly a worse image quality than a Sigma or Tamron 18-200 bring.
2.1 m, the shortest distance synonymous with 28 mm of 1993 are long passe, now less than 50 cm at all focal lengths, just as the figure was very weak performance.
Also, not all the lenses were expensive, do not fit perfectly with the factor of 1.6 smaller Canon sensor, contrast and partly in the sharpness of images sluggish, then no preference whether 1000 or 2000 ¬. Because the stop light is broken differently.
I would if possible take 17-85 IS or 17-55 (2.8) IS
with Nikon 18-70 ED. With a small budget and regular customers could be a synonymous Sigma & Tamron 18-125 or 18-200 worthwhile.
Nikon 18-70 On one sees quickly when the man with the supplied 18-55 compares cheap, which makes it a very different lens is - (glass and metal) and the M AF function, even in the AF Focus nor may regulate.
Yes, the lens makes the pictures, I do not know whether YM so much money for a lens basket wish ....
VG
Jan
Antwort von YourMajesty:
either what I've read here or there is not a Nikon, but Canon?
I think the photographer makes the images, not the lens.
If you do not look that has become a synonymous with a top Top Lens no photographs.
Clearly supports the technology. ;-)
Before I look at the Canons in the regions 17-85, I would look at me the Tamron Front and saved money by perhaps ne 50er Fixed lens - maybe the old 50 Ier buy.
I would be no other than the aforementioned zoom s.meine Canon screwed because I'm so totally satisfied. Unfortunately, good lenses synonymous cost good money. If yes when the camcorders are not much different. Quality costs here unfortunately.
Sure to make better lenses synonymous photos. But a 70-300 IS comes in the imaging performance - the sharpness, the colors, the contrast with not just as the 70-200 L is not with. Had at least not yet seen photos that I had ünerzeugt.
;-)
And with cash back is the 70-200 zoom as the mean well for the Gebotete actually "quite favorable"
Greeting
Tom
Antwort von Jan:
I just wanted to make clear that not every 18-200 Lens equal to "junk", my contribution was Canon and Nikon users of gutverkauften entry cameras 350 & 400 D and D 40 & 50th That I have a Nikkor 18-70 ED on a Nikon D 40 & D 50 set, and the 17-85 IS USM on a 350 & 400 D believe me, hopefully .....
Sorry it was only meant Eberhard - I had my name in the House.
Yes clearly makes the photographer the images exactly as the cameraman.
The best example of my favorite training manager of Canon "Wilfried Olfs" has my colleagues deliberately neunmalklugen the 5 D with the 24-105er L Lens, where only my colleague with the 350er better test pictures made. Amateur lasting forever excerpt great exposure and false, false Lichtinterpetationen, no Blitzgrundverständis for brightening etc. ..
With the 50er is synonymous not every owner of a 20,30,350 or 400 D content for the small sensor called the Lenses for Canon EF times now (S) and not EP, you can clear the use of falling contrast and lack of sharpness to the outside edge may be the consequences. A Strong Light Lens, it is all the time for sports and
Lowlight without flash photographers interesting, it has indeed synonymous to a nearly 350 D Focal portrait.
Now Eberhard have something to say how much money he would spend ....
I would EFS 17-85 IS USM take.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
Sigma, the company has a new lens on the market, the
30mm F1, 4 EX DC HSM, get one for the APS C sensor 350 / 400 D (GSP only C) then 46 mm (KB) and HSM. So slightly more than 300 ¬ depending on the job.
Is synonymous Innenfocusierend actually rare in 50er Fixed focus - Filter friends will be delighted.
Sorry, the small-50s is obviously not synonymous Bad, the House of Lenses have made a very good image quality.
VG
Jan
Antwort von rookiekiller:
Hi folks, I've just priced according geguckt, krass, 1000 euro for the 70-200 .. The camera has just lost by 600 .. EOS400D .. worth it? It is a great difference of standard bildschaerfe to 18-55? fit in all the objective eos 400d when the EF ... hot?
I thank you in advance for the reply
gruss
'm in love with an L objectively .. the catch all to s.600 = o (with what is still s.900 = o (((so expensive ..'m poor student = o)
Antwort von rookiekiller:
I've now not so much money on an objective, can be synonymous to bridge so ne http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a128795.html take? which are fairly inexpensive ... the visual quality is about 18-55 as the standard?
gruss
Antwort von Valentino:
So I use for my EOS-V1, in addition to the usual fixed focal distance Sigma 24-70 with a continuous 2.8 Aperture.
The lens I always have it when I have no space for the 4 fixed focal length and had it quickly go.
I then decided on the Sigma, because it is easier and only one third as expensive as the equivalent Canon lens is. If I, or publicity photos Portrais do I use the natural fixed focal lengths.
When I half a year ago in New York in a nice fashion photographers know that with his 20D was underway, he synonymous Sigma At times my camera had. We then just for a day Lenses exchanged. He says s.nächsten day "I keep this lens" despite that I still be highend 14mm Wide Angle Had ;-)
Greeting
Tino
Antwort von Chezus:
There are differences in image quality with cheap lenses and EF lenses.
I have a 28-105mm and a 135-300 (both EF) and the quality of the images and the processing is simply awesome. The Lenses are just a few years old and are still as soft durchzoomen as s.Anfang.
A friend has one (I think) 70-200mm (cheap version) and because you can really talk of scrap. Knarzt now-you to zoom, makes grieslige images and has a ripped s.Gehäuse (is NOT fallen down, but came from the transport).
The lens is not half as old as mine.
Lenses are expensive, but worth its price.
I was often superior to me whether the 28-300mm lens of Canon with Image Stabilization sale, but I was always too expensive (2000 Euro)
As a standard lens, however ingenious.
Lens shift comes as nurnoch rare
Antwort von Jan:
I've now not so much money on an objective, can be synonymous to bridge so ne http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a128795.html take? which are fairly inexpensive ... the visual quality is about 18-55 as the standard?
gruss The old analog 28-90 mm is 18-55, in principle, the digital world.
On a 350 / 400 completely useless, because the Cropfaktor of 1.6 will still be expected from the 28 will be 44 mm - Wide Angle really no more - for indoor useless because you do not always go away 5 meters can.
One must really understand the sequence of pictures is rather good photographer - Optics - Camera. That is also why some ambitious amateurs to buy the 400 D with the 17-85 IS USM instead of the 30 D with the supplied low 18-55 mm, when the approximately 1100 ¬ will not crack.
For normal photography, the 30 D no major progress in relation to price, yes there are advantages, such as the magnesium casing, the 5 frames per / sec (who needs it and go with the Canon series eh images in the cache, at 400 D is Final spätesens 27 JPEGs), a Penta Prism viewfinder for the brighter image is built, two dials for shutter and aperture and like the slightly better dynamic range - but not what the picture quality would improve significantly.
To the 400 D, a little value to make the battery pack BG E 3 is not a bad idea from the handling.
Take your time the time to look at business in the EFS 18-55 / 28-90 (if you have one since has) and in Comparison to a 17-85 IS USM, it is only 18-55 plastic, no metal ring, no USM engine, not interfering with the AF, no Innenfocusierung Canon glass always spoke of their use in optics - what you where with 99% certainty can exclude that weighs 17-85 provides more than twice as much, then you have the "glass feeling ". The optical stabilizer unit synonymous, of course, has its price.
If the 17-85 is too expensive, look at times Sigma Digital (DC) 17-70 mm 2,8-4,5 this is probably the next "bad". 28-90 würd then I prefer to leave the supplied 18-55.
VG
Jan
Antwort von rookiekiller:
wow, so quickly get feedback, I thank you first for the answer
ok, I look around me, but now L is an objective in mind, but I can do it to me at the moment not afford to
http://geizhals.at/deutschland/a60880.html and die here?
what are you using personally?
gruss
rookie killer
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
Tamron we had in my shop ban, less because of their quality, more because of high prices (for Sigma) and little
Grace reflection. Therefore, I know the Tamron less, so what you just read. The Tamron 28-75 digital sounds, at least not bad.
I photograph little, a lot more movies (SonyPD 170 & FX 7). If it Still Image, then with Fuji F 30, 400 D or Pentax K 10 comes but rarely.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Hollinizer:
wow, what profit cam hast du da = o)
I've now read another forum that the quality eos 400d scatter, some of the dark building to make it so? know or do not like what you photographed, feel it is in auto mode so that it is too dark ..
I am completely noob, I wait for my 400d, which comes tomorrow or tuesday .. willl equally objectively buy another, I'm pretty hot = o)
I thank you for the quick response and help ...
gruss
rookie killer
Antwort von Jan:
They know I am with the 400-D are not professional enough to say.
Only so much to the many forums Image Still, not everyone there is really write what practical experience with the model, or one over the years accumulated Photo Basic.
In fact it is often the case with many models - Aperture correction (underexpose) of benefits. Synonymous is not a problem can indeed be a correction in the 400 D argue (but not in the green mode).
But be careful there is not a few LCDs of cameras with a bright picture to show.
Yes, the PD 170 is a legal popular / affordable camera to a professional level anzupeilen, especially in people who have no Digibeta and related Maz can - as I and my movie friends.
VG
Jan
Antwort von eberhard:
A friendly hello first,
I think it's fine when there are so many answers. I still do not for a lens can resolve, but it will be before the holidays will probably still happen. I am reporting course of my experience, many writers still image and video, I wish all success.
Eberhard
