Frage von ichjetzthier:
Hi, everyone.
I hope to find someone here who can help me.
I took P2 raw material, with a HPX500 in 1080p25. The camera returns to DVC PRO HD, if I rated is in Final Cut the raw MXFs used as 1080i50, if I disclose with logging and pure hole TRANSFERS he makes me out of it 1080p25. As far okay.
On average, in contrast areas is now a partly strong podium training s.harten edges noticed. After many experiments, we have traced the problem to the raw material. Both in P2CMS the podium seen as synonymous in the raw material which is stored in the Capture Scratch FinalCut.
Can it be that the camera delivering the material as, say, that this is the raw material in it? Including podium? Where problems could be created that lead to such a thing? And off especially as I will *** the steps ("jaggies" trivialized the problem ;-)) back?
I hope someone knows the problem and help me!
MfG
Antwort von deti:
Since you've followed a well-known weakness of DVCPRO footage because the camera makes this mode, neither the full HD resolution, nor is the DCT-based method to date. Therefore, Panasonic AVC-Intra is now using synonymous 100th
Deti
Antwort von ichjetzthier:
Say: The material is now so bad as it is, and I do not mind?
As bad as the one that can is my little Sony camcorder for 800 ¬ more!
Antwort von deti:
Say: The material is now so bad as it is, and I do not mind? If you like: Yes.
I would stop and look not just at fast movements, the image errors are synonymous not so clear.
Of course, the stairs would disappear with appropriate filtering, but that you lose the rest s.Bildschärfe still synonymous.
A HPX500 is already synonymous of snow yesterday (light-insensitive, 1280x720 sensors, no AVC-Intra) - an old mill stop. It's obvious that a current consumer camera delivers better pictures. The holding does not look professional ...
Deti
Antwort von ichjetzthier:
Here is an excerpt of a still image. In particular, the pillars of the sign falling on me very negative. Is this something that happens to you normal?
The critical point is really only the synonymous DVD playout. Since this effect increased again very clearly, since then s.diesen really obvious step edges. Street there is a workflow that is especially recommended? Until now, I'm going to get out as uncompressed Final Cut and then reckon with the MPEG Streamclip or Reference to SD down.
This briefly: there will then synonymous AfterFX stuff from real humble when I in the DVC PRO HD sequence nor with purely hole.
Antwort von deti:
Well, if you produce anyway for DVD quality, you can use the Picture before the downscaling blur something to prevent the edges fibrillation. To what extent, the sense is, you have to stop trying.
PS: The optics of the camera was still quite the bargain so bad, as you can see s.den strong CAs.
Deti
Antwort von ichjetzthier:
I produce, unfortunately, synonymous for non HD playout. But which is synonymous okay, since the edges do not even bother still Sun But of course I do not like to lose even more focus than in the downscaling anyway "whistle" is about.
I was kind of hoping that I'm still not a failure because the workflow in it and that the quality is better by fixing the error is ... Yes can not be that ne Camera delivers for sonstwieviel Money How a Picture!
The Optics is halt ne big Vari-Lens by just to get through the day. The budget is not so very high ... ;-)
Antwort von deti:
I produce, unfortunately, synonymous for non HD playout. But which is synonymous okay, since the edges do not even bother still Sun But of course I do not like to lose even more focus than in the downscaling anyway "whistle" is about.
Then you should consider using the DVD version of a higher quality scaling method select. I have no idea of the tools that you take on Mac OS for this normally. Why can not render because Final Cut Pro in DVD quality (that would be my first attempt)? You can even render a second time in HD quality.
I was kind of hoping that I'm still not a failure because the workflow in it and that the quality is better by fixing the error is ... Yes can not be that ne Camera delivers for sonstwieviel Money How a Picture! Well, there is still much to produce in DVC PRO HD, but technically, this method is obsolete. In the case of the HPX500 is produced three chips with 1280x720 pixels, a data stream format 1440x1080. That this is in effect, no Full HD 1920x1080 Resolutionvon should be obvious.
Those who want to deliver today's high-quality images, should rely on AVC-Intra, XDCAM HD or 422nd
Deti
Antwort von ichjetzthier:
I've tried many methods and scaling'm using the best. But I think if I had ne clear statement that the camera is responsible for the dilemma, then that is something that we can confront the camera man who sold us the camera as a working implement.
With the consequences must now be dealt with somehow.
The AfterFX stuff I will ausrendern Not later than the SD and the new stuff then drive together to the SD level, so that at least the DVD looks as good. But my hope was not yet completely disappeared this morning. ;-)
This brief nor the substantive question: How the podium education is about? Easy to scale up would only blurred, but not so ugly.
Antwort von tommyb:
All is not lost (in theory at least) ... what's your email?
Antwort von ichjetzthier:
Try it s.ichjetzthier] at [gmail [dot] com, as long as there are no large files. :-)
Ick looking forward to me ... ;-)
Antwort von tommyb:
I would recommend you to change the email (due to SPAM bots).
Recommended: anything] at [somewhere [dot] com
Antwort von ichjetzthier:
Thanks for the note! - And for the mail. Come! :-)
