Frage von Balu7:
Hello to you all,
I have a question and hope you can help me, I would soon be a movie with a canon XL1 s turn, most shots are in a room and held the tiefenschärfe not really play a big role, but I would like my EF adapter growth and here is the problem, can anyone recommend a lens that a relatively large area covering s.Brennweiten but not too expensive, (which will most probably with his WW rotate, but a few recordings are synonymous on the water and because I probably need ehr n teleob .)...
if someone one or two EF lenses for sale, an ef adapter or even ne canon XL1 s bescheidsagen please!
Hope someone can give me any advice or even sell what many many times already, thanks in advance.
Antwort von Naturvideo:
Moin Balu7,
would have 3-fold Canon XL Wide 3.4 - 10.2 mm must. If you're in the film and Wide Area Anglebrauchst this would be ideal. You save you the EF adapter. For the telephoto range, I would only the Standartzoom ausreizen because the already have enough tele. For animal images do I use an EF adapter with the EF 28-300 L IS wenns not only with the telephoto Standartojektivs no longer enough. Then there are drawbacks, but without end, because the device is very bulky and is shaky. Does it stand a bomb and a very serious and expensive tripod head.
The Wide Angle Sell me, since I changed to XL H1'm almost there and just tele and macro shots. Have only rarely used (etwa20 hours) and only Indoors. Optically, mechanically and gesammtzustand absolutely like new (which is 8 years old and am a previous owner (for cutter bar in Dusseldorf purchased)). price 600 euros. If you're interested here is my email address winfried.hochstetter @ freenet.de.
Winfried
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Question
The standard telephoto lens is not enough?
Note
With EF adapter you lose Apertures
You can take EOS lenses of any kind or adapter synonymous with FD (FL) *** M42 Lenses on EOS adapter gibts synonymous ***
Fixed focal lengths of light are stronger than telephoto lenses
USM L IS lenses, or are the best Canon lenses
2.8 L IS lenses are the luminous "telephoto" lenses
Geil are
70 - 200 mm L IS
300mm L IS
500mm L IS
Between Extension rings are still cool in combination with the large lenses
Friend, you can use big lenses of example only s.Strand outdoors or just
From the hand filming is no longer because of it.
All in all, a little expensive, the whole = schaun whether the standard Objekttiv does not suffice.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von jimi:
if you still have interest. I have a EF adapter must.
unimpaired condition.
marcell_friese@gmx.de
But for the scope aneggebenen he probably really is not suitable. brings no advantage at least in comparison to the Standardobj. the XL1.
So just as a tip.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
@ Nature Video
Which Lens is using you in the macro area now?
At what scale are we talking about at the moment of Macro 1:2,8; 2,8:1 or 1:1?
What are the motives?
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... canon XL1 s. .. EF adapter ... can I recommend someone Lens that a relatively large area covering s.Brennweiten ... But do not forget that you have a EF Adapter XL s.einer-camera image is not the same effect as with the same s.einer Lens EOS Camera: The extension factor is roughly 7.2! In the wide area are you so so anyway. It is interesting that only in extreme combi telephoto range.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von leonhard lierzer:
danke für den tipp, synonymous've already heard them, probably never really check first with what the standard is made objectively or is out of ... and if someone still ne canon XL1 s has and they will necessarily get rid of :-) ))) says about it please !!!!!!!
Antwort von leonhard lierzer:
oh so that was just me balu7 ne? no idea why my name is not displayed with!
Antwort von Markus:
oh so that was just me balu7 ne? no idea why my name is not displayed with! You were not logged when you hit your contribution've written above. And since we here in the forum without registering synonymous write, then, you were a guest on the road.
_________________
Sincerely,
by moderator
