Frage von StapjeVerder:
Hello and nice evening.
For several weeks I have saved and negotiated thalers each part together and then finally I could afford my desired camera.
Yesterday came the FX1000 finally to the right place for my 5 Friday.
To make it in advance to say: The Panasonix MX7 was the last camera I had that lies a few years back. ^ ^
As it is, when new, outrageously expensive - technology eintrudelt I first (short) read through the manual and then some (long) every switch, button, lever, ring, in short: everything out and herzuschieben.
The first recording took place at night, with a normal 60 watt bulb, which was later supported Baumarktbaustrahler of the 08/15.
The camera ran into automatic setting.
Then I wanted to admire the fantastic image quality, of the (almost) everywhere is written.
The camera was via HDMI cable and connected via composite cables.
The composite cable was, the HDMI cable is a cable of 5 euros buddy Konrad. ^ ^
No. 5 minutes after I connected the camera on and pressed play, I had wanted to send the camera back.
If
the image quality of HDV 3000 Euro class, then I stay with my broken Panasonic MX.
Since I obviously do not assume that the image quality is to be expected, there must be one or the other too much or too little depressed button act. So practically, I'm guilty. That would be wonderful.
One of the things that horrified me:
About HDMI was dark and dunklereren places such a strong Grieseln to see that it looked like DV hochskaliert and with John Carpenter film BodegaBay mixed.
Whether with, whether without Baustrahler. It swept, blurred without end.
And actually, I think that the 500 watt Baustrahler somehow Grieseln least minimize the need.
About Composite Effect was (strangely) not so strong. The picture was still far from erwateten picture, but here it was almost negative streaks formation, when the fog clouds in dark image parts.
Among the settings:
The Antiverwackelschutz is issued. The supplied lens hood is attached. In addition, a (quenched) in the HAMA UV Lens.
But the bare synonymous shooting without a lens hood and UV was not a good picture.
I would be delighted if someone here in the forum quite spontaneous, quite blind, could simply say: Man, boy, what has never heard of
this button?
I would of course be willing synonymous me for pedagogical reasons (yes, finally, what I want to learn. ^ ^) In the right direction to push.
I say thank you in advance cautiously.
Gruß,
Max
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... If the picture quality of HDV 3000 Euro class ... It is noisy, blurred without end ... Generally HD cameras require more light for good picture quality than its SD counterpart, so that bogus FX1000 in a 60W bulb certainly not their strengths can be set. If the noise, however, synonymous with the Baustrahler not get better ... Can it be that you gain a high-value use? This blurring could turn to a too long exposure time suggest. Give the camera is still a chance!
Antwort von domain:
There are certainly responsible with handling errors. ND of course, all out, gain at only 60 watts so high that there is still a real, not grieselndes black and of course for test shots from the tripod to film.
HD does not tolerate Herumwacklerei pans and free-hand. Also recommended, depending on the lighting situation synonymous to 1 / 25 second, the Picture shall submit the same time dramatically.
A 60 watt lamp is made of 3 meters for private recordings in any case sufficiently loose as normal grieselt still not much.
Antwort von StapjeVerder:
Hi, Bernd.
I'll give the camera of course every chance in the world. :)
I had actually thought that the automatic transmission does not fail?
I try it tonight or tomorrow from again and present it to gain and shutter.
Would I still take offense if the automatic conjure such images. :)
Antwort von tommyb:
And eighth, that you jaaaaa in HDV and DV non-normal turn ... hö hö hö.
Antwort von StapjeVerder:
Moin.
@ tommyb: No bad idea. :)
But since I do not claim that I should not happen. Only that's unfortunately not.
I will now again Hanover 1-2 hours with my Baustrahler shed and on GAIN and shutter speed ensured.
Danke erstmal s.alle tips.
Gruß,
Max
Antwort von WeiZen:
I type on inserted ND. Anders is the 500W with Baustrahler not be explained.
Antwort von hab ich nicht:
Know your Cam not. In my XH A1, there is an auto-gain switch, if the work as it should grieselt Sau, look if you (if it exists) s.hast. ND rausnehmen, Shutter 1 / 25 or 1 / 50. Then it should funzen
Antwort von jub:
What if you start once the exposure values call! Without these you can not reliably help.
JUB
Antwort von Kristinus Helmut:
Dear Max!
Effects with the camera has rotated several hours. First you need to look at 100% to deal with the Camera. You should make some test shots, for example, in the dark on the highway black, is black and the lights of the utos still drawing in the bright agencies. We have the gene Begrenzuung asked to 12dB, otherwise captures the Camera into the dark places of grieseln! The basic settings for this camera, you can at www.fxsupport.de ersehen.
H. Kristinus
Antwort von StapjeVerder:
Hello again.
I now have the night all over again intensively viewed settings.
@ habichnicht: The FX1000 has then probably something like AGC limit. And I was asked to 18dB.
A reduction of 12dB, the picture has dramatically improved. A setting of 0dB made the Picture (subjectively) good.
ND was not added, the shutter speed was at 50 and due to the poverty of light (without Baustrahler) F was 1.6.
Basically, the picture is now worth its price. :) (The question of whether the camera the user has earned a question to me, logically, not at all.:))
Now I wonder just how I wegbekomme streaks.
I thank you in any case for the "pushing" in the right direction and for the patient to a beginning.
Gruß,
Max
Ooops: One thing I have forgotten:
Anybody know any good but inexpensive HDV monitor, thus turning the sharpness control at them?
And of course a cheap suitcase and / or bag for the FX1000 (inner dimensions must 17cm * * 35cm to 18cm.)
Antwort von Jogi:
Hello again.
...
Now I wonder just how I wegbekomme streaks.
I thank you in any case for the "pushing" in the right direction and for the patient to a beginning.
Gruß,
Max
The question whether there really "streaks" are!
What is the link "TV CAM" have you made?
What Resolutionhat your TV? Did he 100Hz?
Are the streaks synonymous to a monitor to see?
How does the picture in daylight shots from?
Antwort von shodushitanaka:
Have you ever images with footage in Vimeo.com compared?
This here - http://vimeo.com/2644079 - has nice as synonymous to Gain / aperture values to write.
Can according to compare and make - either there is a difference and you have to experiment a bit or the images are similar and it is what it is:)
Gruss
Antwort von ghostpictures.de:
I've got a bit synonymous wat zusammengebastelt.
http://vimeo.com/3549159
http://vimeo.com/3815181
I have the colors there left to AUTO.
Of course you can enjoy a crisp picture much magic or you do color correction in editing program.
I've always shot with 0db gain, Manual, Aperture, HDV in 25p with shutter 50, and white balance.
