Frage von Carlos:Hi,
've just at Swiss Effects,
http://www.swisseffects.ch/deutsch/deutsch_bereiche/d_tape/pages/d_tape.htm
umgesehen.
Dort steht:
select the post an uncompressed component system (Beta-SP, M II) - if possible, digital (Digi-Beta, D1, D5, DCT). The system D2 is not suitable for processing the transfer.
My concern is miniDV footage on 35mm Fazen too. Where, then, is now taking place s.Besten postpro? What exactly uncompressed component system? Where there is no post-processing with standard software such as Adobe Premiere, Apple Final Cut and Sony Vegas sense? Or is it something else? Beta SP or Digi-Beta is still synonymous compressed.
Thank you very much!
Carlos
Antwort von pappe:
?? where digi beta, or beta sp * gg * Please compressed??
simply my online without quality color reduction. They recommend that you convert your material into component video YUV / 4:2:2, ie, beta, etc. digibeta and then with an online system such as combustion, Avid Media Composer, Final Cut Pro editing, so that you the already paltry nich video quality still by further compression - (digital) or copying (analog) verschlechterst next. I think that cutting systems such as minidv dv avid or premiere cause no great harm, unless you think in postproduction s.farbkorrektur etc. I would go down on each instance s.ein professional system.
the optimal variant for the section is to: create a cut list (edl) and online / batch sequence with your copy of the factory where you can Fazen synonymous. even if expensive, right!
greetz
paperboard
Antwort von Carlos:
Hi board,
erstmal thank you for your reply. I verschriben me: BETA SP is not compressed, as analogous. Digi-Beta, but is compressed. Data reduction, Digi Beta 2:1 for DV 5:1.
So, what I have now been rausgefunden: During the post-processing such as with Premiere there is None renewed compression, which would be detrimental to the Fazen. Unless, that I spend the finished material back to DV. Then a new compression takes place. For example, in color correction. Solution: I do not give the finished effect on DV, but would spend it on Digi-Beta, or anything else than uncompressed files ala Targa The file version has the advantage that I can adjust the resolution of the super-ratio 1:1.85.
The love EDL. Yes, you are right. Upwards are no limits to halt. I am pleased with a message of you and of others. Will tell me yes right before I put the money must be on the table.
Antwort von Markus:
Hello Carlos,
If you already have rotated on MiniDV (4:2:0-) compression, makes an example of copying Digital Betacam (4:2:2-Compression) no longer makes sense. The lack of color information can be subsequently not invent it. In terms of brightness resolution DigiBeta and MiniDV are indeed identical. One such video editing with Adobe Premiere so there is no obstacle.
An SD picture fails to convince on the big screen in my opinion, however. With only 720 × 576 pixels does it himself to lay visibly pixelated. I am always surprised when has (in the movies, a spot with such a lousy Resolutionflimmert in production, no one noticed this?). Maybe I look towards synonymous only too well. Tennie probably already have the "digital-with-the-phone-look". There is no preference then everything anyway.
Related Topic:
Antwort von Markus:
BETA SP is not compressed, as analogous.
Even compressed analog signals can be (and were synonymous). Beta SP record the color also Resolutionals with lesser brightness. By the way, making many video systems.