Frage von CiTor:
Hi everyone,
I have only just a small series of interviews with a camcorder and the SonyECM-MS908C Microphone (
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-ECM-MS908C-Microphone-Switchable-Pick-Up/dp/B000095S9N) rotated. Dazu habe ich die Interview-Partner of der Page her filmed and das Microphone auf einem Tripod so nah wie möglich zu den Interviewpartnern gestellt ohne, dass man es auf dem Picture erkennen konnte. Das Resultat ist zwar nicht total schlecht, aber synonymous nicht wirklich überzeugend. Vor allem gestört hat mich der leichte Hall, welcher wohl im Raum beim Sprechen erzeugt wurde (als wir im Raum waren and miteinander gesprochen haben, ist mir diese Akustik allerdings nicht aufgefallen). Ebenfalls wurden kleine Nebengeräusche im Comparison zu den Stimmen viel zu laut registriert.
Ich werde in der nächsten Zeit noch einige weitere Interviews in den verschiedensten Umgebungen drehen müssen and bin deshalb bereit synonymous etwas Money dafür liegen zu lassen. Ich habe mir deshalb den folgenden Setup vorgestellt:
-als Microphone das Rode MTG-2 (
http://www.rodemic.com/microphone.php?product=NTG-2 )
Recorder as I have considered the zoom to get H4n (
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Yes it is because you abnimmst basically two separate sound sources and shuffle them together - if indeed the skis.
Whether it's a zoom object must be about more than one could now discuss about the Micro to be a goer ln angek # should.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hey,
You should not really camera sound mixing and sound of the microphone, but if you really want to hear a question from a reporter / editor. For professional assignments shall be the sound from the microphone on track 1 and the O-Sound (from the camera's microphone) on Track 2 When multiple microphones then added then (partly) still trail 3 and 4 with other microphones. Therefore, it is not bad to start with the camera, especially since you then have to synchronize anything. The recording quality is but a small camcorder not necessarily be good, especially since you have no phantom power. As you may bring an external recording device or a mixer, which you followed s.die Camera (the synonymous phantom power) delivers better sound.
A really good microphone with hypercardioid can already really work wonders synonymous when recording with the camera. Therefore, an investment here is probably better.
A Tonangel always pays for itself (if you have one on set). But watch out that it is really well protected and you do not Klopfer (eg from cable s.der Angel) as a low-frequency sound with aufnimmst.
That said, I think an interview in a restaurant always bad, because you will (if only synonymous bar) in the background hear voices that distract.
Depending on how long you have time to prepare for an interview and whether one can see a hand microphone in the Picture, a lavalier (tie microphone), of course, practically, just a tendency when the interview partners to look in different directions. But there still decline further with a directional microphone to the sound.
The camera sound to include additional never hurts.
I do not know if you need it, but is always synonymous recommended a basket of wind or pop protection.
Best regards,
Constantin
Antwort von CiTor:
Wow, thank you very much for your detailed reply, Constantin!
Professionally, I am so the O-Sound with the Cam, so I can sync later, right? For the o-sound, at least one of my cam is not really useful. Or are there usually tracks mixed together on any ne way?
I have the option of a mixer output with consideration to handle. But then I came to the conclusion that this investment is not synonymous quite favorable and I would rather put the money equal to an external recorder, which I can use it otherwise synonymous (the quality with the zoom would be a total synonymous probably better). The synchronization is not a problem as I PluralEyes the plugin (
