Frage von artisthh:
Hello friends.
Short to me:
I am a filmmaker from HH wedding and had some "good" as DV camcorder GY-DV5000 or SonyPD170 etc. Seitkurzem still a fairly simple HDV Camera of Sony. I work mostly in live cutting and cutting with live mixer. If I cut s.PC then I have the simple version of Pinnacle Studio 9 Pros use. Very easy and "cheap".
I would like to expand and now something new to learn.
My question:
1)
Difference in Final Cut Express and Final Cut Pro?
(I have some already on the home page of Apple and read synonymous gegoogelt. For information about the differences of these two products can not be found. What can be the Final Cut Pro, which is the Final Cut Express can not do?
2)
Final Cut vs Adobe Premiere?
I would be especially interested in your objective assessments. I am aware of some forums, that Final Cut Pro is the industry standard, but it is synonymous many many people are happy to work with Premiere.
What can one what the other can not?
3)
By Lutz Dieckmann his video tutorials, I am attentive to Adobe After Effects has become. For editing program, I want synonymous with a composite software company and learn. What would be the alternative of AE for Mac?
What is the interplay of Final Cut Express and Adobe After Effects `? or would have any problems?
4)
A DV Editing with Final Cut with a MacBook (white with 2GB RAM and 2.4 Mhz + 1TB external hard disks) klappts? or is this notebook just too slow for such a cut?
Because as a Mac system, I have currently just a Macbook. Otherwise a clean PC system.
For some answers I would be very grateful to you. Gladly synonymous only individual tips for each question
Antwort von robbie:
Perfect taste.
Whereby premiere with the rest Productions Suite works perfectly. Final Cut Pro s.Mac naturally very stable.
But in the end the same as BMW or Audi.
Antwort von Chezus:
1: http://www.macuser.de/forum/f45/unterschied-zw-final-160726/
Just after "difference Express Final Cut Pro" google
to 2: Has a lot to do with taste. I've previously worked with premiere and now with Final Cut and think (personally) Final Cut better, because stable and pleasant s.Mac simply because the integration with Quicktime in my opinion is better.
to 3: If you do not have experience with compositing, you will s.Anfang with After Effects despair. In AE you need as well as tinker with everything myself, because the presets are more than poor. Alternatively, it would be in motion what Final Cut Studio with it is. For your purposes I think is ideal, because some very professional-looking presets supplied with that you can convert your wishes.
I have 1 years with Motion worked until I s.meine "borders" pushed am what the demands are concerned. Everything I am in motion not by my wishes could adapt, I then tried in After Effects, so until I come get me. Motion can be much, AE seeehr still much more.
Just try it out. I do not want to say that I am in motion familiar and memorized, but there are restrictions, and therefore I am working now with nurnoch AE.
to 4: you can cut on the device too. Hab out again and synonymous with AE worked on the MacBook. Motion to make the little MacBook, but no fun ...
Antwort von fragile:
I would be especially interested in your objective assessments As already said, is purely a matter of taste.
Bezgl. Stability I have no problems with Premiere CS3 or CS4 now with premiere held. Standalone Programs, both stable, with network data comes first in my experience MUCH better than Final Cut Pro. A major plus point when synonymous in your application rather negligible, the integration with the Adobe suite. There is in the master zb Ultra Edition with a super keyer and the good old DV Rack in a new guise, which I with my laptop during a video production for many times Preview Monitor "aufgebohrt" did.
