Frage von Streamer:
Hello together,
I am quite new in the "HDV business" - so far, I have little stories with DV and made the assorted versions of Final Cut Express editing. Everything fine so far. Now there is a Canon AX-H1 with the short term, what I've rotated, with the highest standard of quality and great compatibility needs to be captured. No problem, I thought - until I at the Apple Intermediate Codec'm pushed, the FCE is used. Apparently there is no way to allow the video to natively capture.
If the codec drawbacks (except the amount of memory) compared with the native MPEG-2 camera? Especially in terms of quality and compatibility (it is not yet sure what happens with the raw material)?
I think it must be re-encoded and thus deteriorates the quality?
What alternatives are there? Do I buy FC Pro?
Thanks for your help!
Streamer.
PS: The search gave me over 5000 results, but I could not find the answer.
Antwort von Axel:
Highest standards? What does it mean? What is planned as an end product? Better options if you have any in Final Cut Pro, ProRes as the 422nd
The thing with the compatibility ... S.Originalclips What should be given, why and in what form? Adobe on the PC accepts the Apple HDV anyway, what has been stated: Tape pass and re-capture. Now I have to Compressor (FCS) an export option "HDV transport stream" discovered that the replacement works, but I must try.
Antwort von Thomas 1:
No loss with Apple Intermediate Codec
Antwort von Streamer:
Highest standards? What does it mean? What is planned as an end product? Better options if you have any in Final Cut Pro, ProRes as the 422nd
The thing with the compatibility ... S.Originalclips What should be given, why and in what form? Adobe on the PC accepts the Apple HDV anyway, what has been stated: Tape pass and re-capture. Now I have to Compressor (FCS) an export option "HDV transport stream" discovered that the replacement works, but I must try. As the final presentations at the moment are high beamers (something between the Panasonic PT-DW10000E and VJP JVC DLA-HD1) directly from the calculator planned. But I will probably use H264, but check the times with the producers of the presentation software (Stumpfl Wings Platinum or m.objects - or know someone appropriate for the Mac?).
The raw material but (possibly with data) by the second hard drive / dritt recovery takes place. Presumably for Final Cut Pro, Avid, or Premiere. This is all still very fresh, so I would like to cut the plants so that all possibilities are open. Yeah, with the hot needle and knit without thorough background - I know. But it then had to go very fast ...
So, what do you - with FCE and the Apple codec start and wait for what is really needed or should it (no idea if I will soon need even more time) on good luck in Final Cut Pro to invest? Have I understood it the Final Cut Pro no longer as a standalone but only in the studio package?
If the ProRes 422 codec then really the election or uncompressed but would work?
By the way, may need to be deinterlaced. The available filter of FCE is not exactly terrific, does Final Cut Pro is very much better, or do I need a plugin?
Last (maybe stupid) question: Is Premiere CS3 a real alternative?
In any case, thanks for your help!
Streamer.
Antwort von Axel:
With FCE you will already have a sensible quality manage. Try just how far you have come so that (FAST course, fortunately, you know the program). With the transfer to PC's, however, is difficult. There remain only the most stupid tapes.
Last (maybe stupid) question: Is Premiere CS3 a real alternative? Look, please look at the prices for Adobe products! And only Photoshop and After Effects can be an "industry standards" means, Encore is scrap premiere at least second choice. With FCS, you have less money for two true bringer schonmal: Final Cut Pro and DVD Studio Pro. You have an integration, as they better not be, because the operating system and software 100% complementary. No Gezicke, no crashes, which is obvious as you try to shortcut, works right away, because a window is already ten times just before the stroke, and you're ready. After Effects is cool, but Motion is easier. Everything in Apple Production Suite "actually missing is Photoshop, and you have to credit Apple's times that it makes no secret synonymous: Everywhere in the FCS manuals will be provided indirectly Photoshop. The other stuff on the other hand, with no mention.
Antwort von Streamer:
Moin Axel,
the problem is, it must be preceded by a trailer for the network are cut, the presentation hardware is not there yet and there are approximately 10 hours for material capture. If the trailer, so to speak, I try to cut into FCE and then find the presentations for better quality visible with the ProRes 422 to achieve, I must re-capture everything ...
The CS3 Design Premium I have anyway (I am a photographer), After Effects, I rarely use and if Apple Motion works like (it would be ;-)), the tendency is then to FCS. With DVD Studio Pro, I have worked in the study times and was very impressed because I did with the Sonic Scenarist (one of the first versions) had to struggle ... but that was years ago.
So far, I could always submit the post and was only responsible for Picture's. But the budgets are tight ...
Anyway, You have really helped and I check the times with the client - it should probably FCS her (yes Color looks very intuitive from synonymous).
Another tip for deinterlace and Slowmo? I have here in the forum rumgestöbert times.
Deinterlaces via Compressor?
http://cowcast.creativecow.net/podcast/final-cut-pro-compressor-deinterlacing--209Oder with Plugins?
http://www.revisionfx.com/products/fieldskit/ Slowmo with motion or with plugins? Twixtor already looks very cool [[url] http://www.revisionfx.com/products/twixtor/[/url] and here I have probably nice freeware found:
Antwort von Streamer:
Update: FCS 2.0 is ordered.
Among the questions above, a hintendran: Can ProRes 422 encoded movies on Mac's Final Cut Pro without a view? Is there a standalone codec for QT?
Streamer.
Antwort von Axel:
Update: FCS 2.0 is ordered.
Among the questions above, a hintendran: Can ProRes 422 encoded movies on Mac's Final Cut Pro without a view? Is there a standalone codec for QT?
Streamer. No idea what that involves.
A few notes next to your post above:
No, color is not so readily with the other Studio programs to compare. Less intuitively, the program of surface, I would say.
In the
creative cow tutorial shown deinterlacing method is probably synonymous with third-party plugins not be topped (Approximately FieldsKit) as they follow the same principle. I understand you so that you want to perform deinterlacing to 50 phases, in principle, for a slow motion to get. You know that you would otherwise with the A1 have the opportunity, in the "f" mode to 25p?
In addition, interlace images - just as they are - no problem for a large-scale projection.
Special Forum:
http://www.finalcutprofi.de
Antwort von Streamer:
I understand you so that you want to perform deinterlacing to 50 phases, in principle, for a slow motion to get. That is the plan and one of the reasons why we have decided against 25f. A few months ago, I have with an AG-HVX201AE worked in 50p - very cool slow motion!
Only with the post I had previously holding quite vinous to do ...
What Your hältet of Twixtor?
Streamer
