Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Hier geht es zur Newsmeldung: Final Cut Pro in a bind between MC5 and CS5!
Antwort von cineco:
This of course only for "old" tape-based production environments, the dying slowly but surely. But for Filebased applications you actually need only a PC. Since then enough already and the laptop from a hotel room or the back seat of a vehicle is the production studio. Of course, it all depends on the specific case. But it's just synonymous with very little effort and that's a great relief and the opportunity for independent film makers. What software is then used for cutting, is more a matter of opinion and taste. All serve their purpose. Premiere says for example that you get it cheap in a package with more powerful applications such as Photoshop and After Effects, without that, it actually manages barely.
Antwort von freezer:
This of course only for "old" tape-based production environments, the dying slowly but surely. But for Filebased applications you actually need only a PC. This may be valid for manageable projects and individual fighters, but not for expensive projects with large teams. Here, it is not very accurate on a consistent, smooth work processes - and offers the Adobe safe. I laugh inside every time at the Adobe roadshows, if there proud of the integration of audio - and video products on the basis of mini-projects with a handful of clips is shown. Each of the larger projects have had to do with it, knows the painful experiences and problems to handle, if the project includes hundreds of clips with thousands of cuts - there are problems with the export from the AME, Dynamic failure of links, problems with the transfer of s.das recording studio audio tracks, etc., etc.
Just the premiere of media management is a joke - especially when you see then that, for example After Effects these controlled better.
And we need to Encore CS4 not synonymous in the set, the thing is unstable as an old ship wreck.
Of course, it all depends on the specific case. But it's just synonymous with very little effort and that's a great relief and the opportunity for independent film makers. What software is then used for cutting, is more a matter of opinion and taste. All serve their purpose. Cutting is not the only one in the film production process. For the one-man show provides a workable Adobe package, but for everyone else, I doubt it very much.
Antwort von Bespi:
And we need to Encore CS4 not synonymous in the set, the thing is unstable as an old ship wreck.
However, there is already a very stable CS5. Nevertheless, I'll give you that right, that much improvement on Premiere and is expandable in particular.
Antwort von koji:
So I work at ORF and will have only recently migrated with 10 squares cut on Final Cut Pro and I am not exaggerating when I say, pure horror!
the good old liquid ran 100% better than the whole apple tool.
in prof. broadcasting area is rich apple avid NIE does water.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Nope, here it goes quite well.
Antwort von koji:
the import IMX's all in real time - great manko
Antwort von freezer:
the import IMX's all in real time - great manko How do you play as a material?
Antwort von koji:
IMX player via Final Cut Pro or liquid
Antwort von felix24:
This may be valid for manageable projects and individual fighters, but not for expensive projects with large teams.
Cutting is not the only one in the film production process.
The question is, whom you meet here in this forum. I think these are more lone than large companies or TV stations. But even TV stations share even more on this in the form of lone VJs.
I think it's certainly good that it's easier today than ever before to make movies and that synonymous with little effort goes a lot. My motto is, therefore, synonymous "less is more". Then it synonymous sufficient if we have good material, cut to just hang out. In most cases, however, the material is so bad that you make, on average, then shit gold and must do up all sorts of boring stuff with effects.
Many believe that today is just standard. But the audience is nearly as far as to see through this and have it filled. Therefore have to show again increasingly synonymous real success of projects that fail to all the (endless as 3D and computer effects) and real images with types in well-told stories. The people want to see the belly and not binding s.der most exciting point in the movie and so a shit.
Antwort von WoWu:
Nope, here it goes quite well. What now, PM?
Citation PM
Final Cut Pro has its quirks, bugs, performance problems, stability problems. However, it has a solid timeline, good tool and a lot of features, supported formats enough video. AVC?? Whether as an HD or intra? DIRAC?? Nil, etc., etc.
PM:
It's because Final Cut Pro can handle poorly with large projects. So, what now, things are going well or as in the other thread above?
Antwort von PowerMac:
It works very well. Despite crashes. The more we make time for big projects and commercials, the more I notice: every large program is a bugged piece of software. Whether or 3D planning software is Schnittprogrämmchen.
Antwort von Valentino:
It works very well. Despite crashes. The more we make time for big projects and commercials, the more I notice: every large program is a bugged piece of software. Whether or 3D planning software is Schnittprogrämmchen. Well if you mean. For me the crashes AVID MC maybe once a year s.and Cinema 4D has been synonymous with me until now never to Kretschmer.
When it comes to frequent crashes, then that may lie synonymous times s.einer vollgemülten hard drive, faulty memory, or even incorrect drivers s.der overloading the system.
The one tinkered together myself I-Mac with FW800 1TB hard drive, of course, considerably slower and more error prone than one workstation from a pro is grouped with Fiber Channel RAID but it should be clear.
And it's professional NLEs of discussion here. Depending on the size on such a system are loosely synonymous times 100 customer orders. As you consider whether to set up twice but then the system is a new version to install, just because it supports one or other new formats.
Antwort von PowerMac:
My dear friend, Valentino,
yes, I know that you want to adorn yourself always with professional equipment, but here you lie actually wrong.
We are working now for several years with Final Cut Pro and it is simply unstable, the more complex the projects are.
And no, we do not synonymous gefrickelten iMac, but a Mac Pro with RAID and external hard disks for backups only. Our Macbook Pro are all stable, synonymous the iMacs are more stable. The only reason for this lies in the fact that those are just a simple project to Chen. Nothing complex, nothing big.
I drive me around forever in the Final Cut Pro forums synonymous and there are known problems. The best examples:
http://www.finalcutprofi.de/phpboard/viewtopic.php?t=60977&highlight=bugs
http://www.finalcutprofi.de/phpboard/viewtopic.php?t=62244&highlight=bugs
Nevertheless, I like Final Cut Pro and its features.
And when our people fall synonymous Maya and composite (formerly Toxik from). And yes, damn the synonymous have an 8-core Xeon machine with an HP Fibre Channel Raid. Software has bugs. Who makes only small things, they will certainly never feel!
How it works s.deiner University in Stuttgart?
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Valentino
Since I'm pretty much with you, only you can not synonymous all your life to MJPEG rumhudeln "" just because you "fear" must own, your system works together.
If systems can not provide the market demands, but all begin with a party right to want to own codec, it is time to look for systems that meet the needs of camera manufacturers synonymous. And as long as you do not have to search. AVID was already one of the good examples.
