Frage von AgenZas-bros1:
Hello,
Here is the first official trailer for our "Great movie", s.dem we work since 2005:
http://www.agenzas-brothers.de/filme/Trailer1mpeg.mpg -> MPEG/8MB
The trailer is still nothing about story, characters and name of the movie price (still secret)! He should just like to make the movie :-)
Here are a few details about the movie:
Length: about 100 minutes;
Genre: Action SIFI-adventure-comedy;
Production: my brother & I:
36-pages script, no storyboard;
completely re-synchronized to music & after;
in the entire movie only play with 4 people;
the film was about 80% before a green screen rotated (Greenbox);
Camera: Panasonic MiniDV 1CCD of;
important Programs: Maxon Cinema 4D, Adobe After Effects, Adobe Premiere, Adobe Audition.
We film in 2005 were technically still relatively inexperienced, knew not yet what is a white balance and the light in the film is targeted to be introduced - when did this rotation is not observed. We try as much as possible but at the post-production out! Once he is ready to learn it of course! Or s.and to look at our website: http://www.agenzas-brothers.de/index.htm
Antwort von Eva Maier:
So how it looks like your career is ending.
/ E
Antwort von Debonnaire:
Not so bad, guys!
Interesting mix of high-end 3D computer rendering scenes with mixed school boys.
If you have anything on the level of the best settings brings, then you have almost what Hollywood. Unfortunately, the cardboard masks of the warrior and the space battle scenes Kuhweide (gravel pits and Lehmabbaugebiete own very well be synonymous as Extraterrestrial) but then a bit from. But this is obviously a budget issue, which you can not accuse you.
The use s.PC and vorallem synonymous s.Tonmixpult are remarkable!
I'm curious, sometimes what contexts see. Here, the latent weakness then of course even more visible, because the fast, trailer-like interface will no longer be so gracious about the simpler scenes across can save.
Antwort von Axel:
George Lucas
is filming. There is a funny Dvix-animated film, a "Mocking of" over Lucas'Dreharbeiten to
Lord of the Rings. On the question of the sets will be embarrassed and he points to a hundred young people who sit in front of computers.
All your movies have the theme as subtext:
We are impressed with naive effect without content of cinema. - But you have neither the means, whose effects imitate, nor any circumspect attitude about this stuff, which would allow you to, with irony points. That's why the films are neither funny nor impressive, but quite uninteresting.
Would you rather own ideas and their strained attempt to make the best possible expression of this finding, it would s.den
technical skills you will not be missing. Probably a question of age.
Antwort von Debonnaire:
George Lucas is filming. There is a funny Dvix-animated film, a "Mocking of" over Lucas'Dreharbeiten to Lord of the Rings. Haste the link on this? Will I see!
Antwort von AgenZas-bros1:
Hey Axel,
nice that you express your opinion, but how many of our films have you seen and how well you know us, that you are of "All your movies have the theme as subtext: We are impressed with naive effect without content of cinema." speaks? Probably only the trailer, "One Two-Gether" & "The Gnubbels - Episode 1"! That's enough, unfortunately, still not enough for us as a "naive impression of the cinema without content effect" stamp! You can of course do, is your opinion!
We are truly special effects enthusiasts (that is not - all about explosions, murder and geballere & manslaughter Goes to not more!) And we are certainly not alone! We are learning bit by bit to generate digital worlds, design 3D objects that we predict from our own imagination to sketch out and make us of great "without content" Effect-cinematographic inspiration! Content should not be missing it anyway - The trailer is still not content halt price, which I have already written! But do not worry, our next shoot will be more and more "content" to bear.
You are, as you are, we are like we are & what we make it fun!
Look at our films do not, if you do not like it - you'll hardly believe it, but it is that simple :-)!
PS: What are you doing actually for movies?
Antwort von Mike.:
I have not seen your films .. The do not all, if I click on it. Is this normal or am I stupid?
Antwort von Eva Maier:
@ AgenZas-bros1
Do not stir - critics have still not done and does not hurt synonymous. you can only learn from.
Good would be if what you like synonymous slightly broader audience would be, and - new ideas need the land.
/ E
Antwort von aaVe:
Hiho,
your film is echt geil of the effects since I freu me soon a coherent film of you to see:)
mfg aave
Antwort von AgenZas-bros1:
I have not seen your films .. The do not all, if I click on it. Is this normal or am I stupid? geh Mike on the link below:
http://www.vfx-forum.de/viewtopic.php?t=12993
Antwort von AgenZas-bros1:
Hey Eva Maier,
du has quite sure - I'm still not as long as in forums on the go! I should everything not take so personally!
Antwort von Mike.:
I have now seen the movie with the world salvation. He is a little cheap. You should in any case, you better cam ne growth. The sound is not synonymous overwhelming ... at least you have your new project fishermen? Otherwise ... the 3d animation is good. I would not be achieved but with the right program is certainly not too difficult ...
Antwort von AgenZas-bros1:
Hi Mike,
"One Two-Gether" my 17-year-old brother alone made. As an interim project, because he s.einem other film works. However, we will soon be no more small intermediate projects, because when people do not get as good (because technically not ausgerreift) and tell us more on individual projects. The sound is completely nachsynchronisiert - but you're right, not overwhelming. Will soon be better :-)
Antwort von Axel:
Look at our films do not, if you do not like it - you'll hardly believe it, but it is that simple :-)! You
have liked me so. I myself look at Super 8 "parodies" (Bond, The White Shark, Star Wars) made, and they harvested in the closest circle of applause, and also a maximum recognition for the effort invested. If my comments have knitted patronizing, sorry. If you do not like my reaction, but they are ignored - it simply is this
PS: What are you doing actually for movies? Erwischt cold! Not good enough to publish, because I work. However, as a spectator, I will give my mustard. Stay s.Ball, and let you not letting the fun.
@ Debonnaire the link:
http://stage6.divx.com/members/171190/videos/1019401
Antwort von AgenZas-bros1:
Sorry Axel, habs a bissel personally taken :-)
Antwort von PowerMac:
Everyone was 17 or 18 times and was such a funny film. This is synonymous not bad, just can not be classified as "film" to be taken seriously. Still technically remarkable! Arsch was certainly a lot of work. The actors are not so great. You will later times special effects people. Only if it is synonymous for Directing enough? Still Respect. But why make her a film scheiss technically good? Personally, I stand more on story, actors and moods.
Antwort von AgenZas-bros1:
We are holding Special Effect freaks :-) But that shit is not he (yes it did not yet seen)! Is a comedy with real story - even if more resources to this end, he is funny - as far as I can judge! Was my first script.
Antwort von Axel:
We are holding Special Effect freaks :-) But that shit is not he (yes it did not yet seen)! Is a comedy with real story - even if more resources to this end, he is funny - as far as I can judge! Was my first script. You're like Harry Potter in Part 1, a lot of tricks in stock. Only when he discovered shocked that he is the snake language, gets the character depth. Translated: Only when a story relating to something real, is it interesting. The technique is a means to an end for George Lucas for making money, for others, to express something. Watch
clockwork orange at times.
