Frage von Christian89:
Hey I have the Sonyvx2000e a week since the fuzzy videos unfortunately makes ...
no preference whether the focus is on auto or manual image I'd like it spicy remains blurred, only in the macro area, but the picture is sharper.
Has anyone ne idea what this could be?
Have already reset, but the cam is still blurred with no preference whether or not fisheye ...
Here is a video without Fisheye: http://s2.video.blip.tv/0860002260511/ChristianLutz-Zoom650.mov
and a screenshot
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/1153/bild15dm5.png
schöne grüße
Antwort von jmarugg:
may be a defective available.
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
The recording with the WW does not even ... the other looks "strange" from. Is the Camera aufgeditscht times? Should
you not have happened.
But just in the inbox found, perhaps this is at your nearby:
http://www.film-tv-video.de/ [/ url] "] Camera Check-Up Tour 2008 [of jvc]
Take advantage of the free and informal visit to our specialists.
Whatever the Manufacturer: We check your camera and make them optimally. Book now one of the coveted seats at a check point near you. Because you know: Perfect pictures are professional thing!
Sign up today s.and book is one of the coveted seats at a check point near you. The number of participants is limited.
Lugano (CH) 18.02.08
Geneva (CH) 20.02.08
Brussels (B) 22.02.08
Bratislava (RO) 26.02.08
Münster (D) 29.02.08
Berlin (D) 04.03.08
Cologne (D) 06.03.08
Zurich (CH) 19.02.08
Duiven (NL) 21.02.08
Vienna (A) 25.02.08
Prague (CZ) 27.02.08
Munich (D) 03.03.08
Hamburg (D) 05.03.08
(not quoted in full)
It is far from me, here want to spam ... but generally find it interesting (I have
no JVC Camera).
BG, Andreas
Antwort von RKD:
was not what the Sony manual .... VX2000 because it has an optical image stabilizer (in Optic oily liquid stored) then possibly if you have a great flight in Height behind you, you take damage? Otherwise I would have no explanation.
mfg
Reinhold
Antwort von Christian89:
Hey
Mir is the Camera never fell down until last week she has still synonymous videos super gemacht!
In the instructions I have not found the image stabilizer ...
but the camera was really only at home or I had to stop well padded to bring to film.
where could I use the camera because at times they hinschicken repaired?
synonymous here again No images without fisheye http://img125.imageshack.us/img125/7881/bild30xg8.png
nice greetings and many thanks for the reply!
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Do as I say yes you do not have happened ... any no-juvenile in the house, perhaps? :-)))))
Can s.der VX 2000 may still be the focus in the menu? Perhaps what is there to "Supersoft" asked.
To move something without really never any optics ...
BG, Andreas
Antwort von Matoff:
I have a vx-2000 for 8 years. try the einsellung: manual focus and then press the push-button auto. when the auto focus and manual einsellung left side s.objektiv not work with is very likely a broken before. the menu is a closure of the focus is not possible, there is only the stable and the d.zoom off. the cam has no optical stabilizer. look at the sony site only, where is the nearest service.
gruß kroky
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... ... vx-2000 has no optical stabilizer ... I would be very surprised if your VX2000 does not have!
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Matoff:
bernd e. it is unfortunately so. The vx-2000 is with a stable electronic image provided. sony lagging in the quality of the image stabilizer, which is still behind. canon can do better. proboscis test, vs. ex1. s.hat again shown.
gruß kroky
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Hi, how can the camera with a chip size of 450,000 pixels (400,000 effective) than ever digitally stabilize? Even the VX1000 had an (excellent) optical stabilization, which in the ancient Mavicas FD96 etc., was the successor model has not?
The bulge s.Lens right (in the 2000 Manual on Page 13, pictures 1 and 2 to see) is s.derselben body like the VX1000, sits behind the optical stabilization - or has Sonyda empty space conversion?
So I think with the "digital" does not somehow.
BG, Andreas
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... is unfortunately so. The vx-2000 is with a stable electronic image provided. sony lagging in the quality of the image stabilizer, which is still behind ... So until now were the Sony stabilizers tend to be quite a bit better than in comparison to the competition, but likes the taste synonymous thing. As for the VX2000, because you can but believe that they stabilized optical: The VX1000 has done so and the VX2000 with the VX2100 virtually identical anyway. How do you ensure that the then leader of consumer class "only" should have electronical stabilized? The source of the show to be honest I would be interested. Even Sony in any case always speaks of an optical stabilization.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Matoff:
if you do not believe me, look at purely digital video active. in the test booklet 4-2007 vx-2000 vs. 1st pan dx there is nothing new, which saves sony where it goes. the hc-1 had an electrically synonymous. stable and the cost of 2000 ¬ in the market. Nevertheless, the former sonycams without bugs, which unfortunately is the exception.
gruß kroky
Antwort von RKD:
So the bet run and the VX 2100 has an optical Image Stabilization.
Bernd is usually very well informed. I am amazed already, this user, the synonymous after 8 years of their own camera do not yet know. That should be one or the other but make the manual again to read.
mfg
Reinhold
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... the hc-1 had an electrically synonymous. stable and the cost of 2000 ¬ ... When is it's so so synonymous in the official documentation and testing. The VX2000 would be different, because it everywhere (maybe with the exception of the said active video-article, I do not have on hand) of an optical stabilizing the speech was / is. Would then - in contrast to PD150, VX2100 and PD170 - but still only an electronic drinstecken, it would already be misleading.
Faith, I can not, however, since it already because of the missing pixels technically should not work. A colleague of me has two VX2000 on deployment, but I fear I am doing something unpopular, if I break the casing and out what's really drinsteckt ... ;-)
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Do I need hardly decompose, because I have the ultimate proof:
Uncle Sonny writes here, the self
I think the Sony website for a little more credible as a video image or video assets, or how that is.
BG, Andreas
Antwort von Matoff:
would be interesting what active digital video would have to say. I have the heft here and now there's times of electr. stabilize the talking. maybe drop a rein. Who to believe now? my vx manual goes no closer to here is only the STEADYSHOT in the functional states. I can only test on the appointed heft. it took me all but synonymous thoughtfully vote, the sony in the year 2000, a cam for almost 9000.-dm brings to the market that do not have stable optical. misreporting happen sometimes synonymous here. you should be right, then sorry, I can like many other synonymous only rely on sources.
gruß kroky
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
would be interesting what active digital video would have to say. I can only imagine so that the manual and have taken about gestolpert that there are actually Sonyda nix on the functioning of STEADYSHOT writes - namely they do else ALWAYS, I have three manuals and I can s.ein fourth (of the Mavica) remember exactly. Since there is so much everywhere. Sonybenutzte this is used to define the products of the competition, which is largely stabilized digital still (if ever).
This video assets then hastily concluded that it probably has to be digital. So clever, sometimes after the pixel number to look (at DV would then typically be 800,000 or more), which then were not. Cooking halt synonymous only with water.
BG, Andreas
Antwort von Christian89:
So with the manual focus and "push auto" I have tried synonymous is synonymous not sharp ...
then I probably really send: (
could anyone tell a good load of the repair could sowas?
s.besten in hamburg or nearby!
should now only zb linse back in the right distance to be or do I fear its expensive repair have?
Thank you
Antwort von chris67:
Each lens has two lens groups. The first movement, the focal, and the second represents the sharpness after and it works with virtually all camcorders electronical controlled servo.
Since there is no adjusting various lenses, but only a repair of the adjustment s.sich. This may of course have all sorts of defects, faulty sensors of the first lens group started on the control electronics through to the servo motor itself Submit inevitable, it can sometimes be a trifle.
Antwort von chris67:
Bin grad randomly on this thread here drübergestolpert ... supposedly there are NEN focus error ... well, either I'm schaasaugad (blind) or you have all seen what else than me. I got me. Mov file can be viewed and not blur even detect any distortion.
With high Focal it is very easy to detect which area of the blurred and sharp (but perhaps it was so synonymous with macro area ... what is actually meant to be ;)... telephoto macro lens with = s.zu film near the Object ...)
So, where what you see as blurred.
And the second is, when flying, the Image Stabilization are destroyed or influenced by the lens or system? Has someone more information? Listening for the first time I am a little puzzled and when synonymous with the statement under pressure, etc sounds plausible ...
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Has someone more information? Guckstu
