Frage von Ioppe:
Hello, very brief and painless:
If I GEMA-free music had (eg the DVD of a magazine), I have them in the closing quote or elsewhere?
Regards
Antwort von exit:maria:
Hello, very brief and painless:
If I GEMA-free music had (eg the DVD of a magazine), I have them in the closing quote or elsewhere?
Regards No! You need to use the GEMA report comes a form on the Gemaseite, then after three days of the post with confirmation of Gema freedom.
Antwort von Flati:
see synonymous here:
http://forum.slashcam.de/gemafreie-musik-erfahrungen-vt54809.html?highlight =
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
No! OMG! GEMA-free right is
not free. The author of GEMA-free music has just the right credits to be called, like all other synonymous.
Look at the Creative Commons licenses, because the name belongs to the most common variant license.
BG, Andreas
Antwort von Ioppe:
Seems not as short and painless to go, hehe.
@ Host
The music is clearly marked GEMA-free, why should I then again that GEMA sign ...?
@ Flati
This applies but is not on GEMA-free, but royalty-free or Creative Commons License content, or not?
@ Andreas
Of course, the creator the right guy called in to be the only question is whether a necessity :-) the Creative Commons have, unfortunately, less so with what the GEMA freedom to do as I understand it: - /
In the Magazine (in this case "video movies" in the issue 1 / 2008) is a box which says:
Legal Notices With the acquisition of the magazines to obtain the spatially and temporally unlimited right to use the included songs and sounds. They can be used for any private and commercial productions are used. Prohibited productions with violent, right-wing or pornographic content. [...]"
The Weggekürzte refers to the software on the DVD, therefore omitted.
Unfortunately, this box helps me not next, because nothing he says about the mention. Can you perhaps read somewhere that I must specify? I would like to avoid that if the go.
On the GEMA website can I find synonymous unfortunately no advice, but another question:
There are the stylistic resources of the
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Big sigh ... why three names disappear teufel not get the word "quote" from this whole discussion? Forget it!
Nobody quoted here! (That had to go ;-))
Credited call: see http://www.finanztip.de/recht/online/urheber-nennung.htm; Kurzfassung who fails the copyright claim, damages may make exceptions, but they are conceivable, if the industry (in the film should not be the case).
Of course, the creator the right guy called in to be the only question is whether a necessity If he has the right ... then answered the question yes of itself
Creative Commons: but oh, the CC works are
mostly GEMA-free. However, the notification to the GEMA you have to do so already, because you probably on the CD-ROM magazines no exemption certificates for each title will find. Without the certificates, you can get a problem. GEMA checks of just the title you submitted.
BG, Andreas
Antwort von Ioppe:
Okay, the question of reference would thus be eliminated, "unfortunately" -.-
Good, that with the CC, I had read differently elsewhere, but good if it's remains.
Well keep me but two cases. First: I do not want to grumble, but rather to understand: a magazine
writing gives me the assurance that I could freely use the material, it is synonymous nowhere pointed out that what I must register. How can it (should it?) As being a magazine so that the responsibility and pulls me into the sour apple bite if GEMA me "pack"? How is it possible to know something? : - /
On the DVD (as probably expected) no certificate. But the words of the composer and his website, I should perhaps first ask (GEMA is so appealing to me as athlete's foot!)?
On the other hand:
I understand your objections Bzgl of the quote, but find that you hastily judge. Why should I not quote? I have not read all the sources, but trust (or naive?) Wikipedia, actually. I was in my case scrupulously kept s.die provisions and designates the playback of a whole plant during a video, not as a quotation.
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Why should I not quote? Because a quote is not simply the acquisition of small, large or complete snippet in a separate work. Neither completely - even in part.
Do you want to actually cite (which I already believe in the current case, why not, because you even a CD booklet with "free" music and hardly use a video about this issue because you do ...), as a scientific work on the work of a contemporary musician and give you with his style deal, then come quotes from the plays in question - if you want an example of how often these musicians in the sound vergreift how well he mastered his tremolo etc.
Or you do a movie review: You show a scene and sets you in your work to address.
Note: In your quote of plant must be addressing the essential element to the quotations you can only use in this context, and synonymous only to the extent (Music: as long) as it necessarily requires the purpose. In other words, quotes must be kept as short as possible kept. Good music is always to quote the same trouble ...
GEMA Release: synonymous with athlete's foot you have to circumvent. Invest a few cents into the phone conversation or a (nice) email. In the case of public performances is the first GEMA presumption ... You should read
before you arrange the release ;-)
BG, Andreas
Antwort von exit:maria:
There is a scene from a movie.
If I were in an essay quoting whom, I want an opinion or sentiment to build, for example in a very controversial Hitler or Socrates an "instance", or you want contrast. The scene reminds a little of "Midnight Cowboy", so I quote with the title track of that movie, also with Harry Nilsson. Included is a short intro and the beginning of the song (it has to be yes according to Wikipedia can be clearly seen). This song is not essential, but helpful or supportive as a quotation.
Then today, I probably look at the GEMA call. If yes in nearly the reputation of the GEZ.
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
[sigh] Last attempt: You zitierst not accompany you.
The recording of individual songs and pop songs in the documentary Born videotapes over the years from 1942 to 1952 in relation to the admissibility of references under Section 51 of the Copyright Act No. 2 to be considered, whether the reference points in a factory by the end, be given due treatment and whether the concrete Using quote from each end is covered, which is met only if the agency used in the document as a basis for discussion or self-serving explanations. (...) Each quote, after all - despite the freedom of art from the derivative expansion by the Federal Constitutional Court (Constitutional Court AfP 00, 451 - Heiner Müller) - a kind of synonymous as "end quote" ahead. (...) In addition, music is a quote only within the limits of section 51 No. 3 UrhG permitted. And this requires the integration of musical quotation in another 'independent work of the Music "ahead. Permitted copying, distribution and public performance of a published work for the purpose of quotation, unless the use to the extent required by the specific purpose is justified. This is permitted in particular if
1.einzelne works after the publication in an independent scientific work to explain the contents to be
2.Stellen a work after publication in a separate language works are cited,
3.einzelne bodies of a published work of music in a separate work of music period. These are the requirements s.einen documentary or s.ein quote ... they are for a short film definitely not lower.
BG, Andreas
Antwort von exit:maria:
With German officials, I am not good friends - but for your relief, I ask colleagues because legally, the trial should last one to remain so :-)
Thanks for the info and reconnaissance (sversuche).
I do not want to open a new issue, so I ask here:
Can I "just so" in major productions such as the logos of the manufacturer of my equipment in the guy inside it? advertising is for, or do I ask the synonymous? if so, then I am someone nciht.
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
With German officials, I am not good friends - but for your relief, I ask colleagues because legally, the trial should last one to remain so :-)
German officials, I can not ... 'm a lawyer. Forget the way, the protected manufacturer logos (at least without the manufacturer to ask) or ask one, with the legal knowledge.
Antwort von theorizee:
Thank you and Bye!
:-)
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
Without anyone now want to address specifically: I am of course always constantly the same questions to read. Well, maybe that was just Suchskript Gugel overloaded or unavailable.
The next stage is the lack of understanding of the given explanation. Well, the questioner may be a bad day or it is not simply enough explained.
Sometimes, however, that such a thread in the very clear statement "that was now not the answer I wanted to have and I'm interested in this anyway, whether this is allowed or not."
That is not
to understand. Somehow I have the impression that the various threads GEMA accumulates in das
Antwort von theorizee:
... he Andreas, I do not want stupid come:
But do not you a little bit wrong when you say that it was not simple enough? Quotes from the laws which were apparently not understood used was perhaps not as optimal.
I'll give you quite otherwise, but you have to be fair: - /
Regards
Antwort von theorizee:
... he Andreas, I do not want stupid come:
But do not you a little bit wrong when you say that it was not simple enough? Quotes from the laws which were apparently not understood used was perhaps not as optimal.
I'll give you quite otherwise, but you have to be fair: - /
Regards A little more leniency, he studied yet.
Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:
... not quite ... Conclusion 13 years ago ;-)
Quotes from the laws which were apparently not understood used was perhaps not as optimal. So yes
edited quotations from the judgments. At the laws - so my experience - as long as some seem rumzudeuteln and to turn to - for example, ne? - The word "quote" on its own soundtrack fits.
That is the dilemma: you can read something and think its part, then falls on the muzzle of a howl and then here (or in the Heise Forum ;-)) about this wicked government, the evil judges and above all, and in particular stupid lawyers on rum.
Or one that reads and corrects the greatest nonsense. Then you might keep one or the other before an (expensive) mistakes, but must leave angiften.
Serious Choice?
BG, Andreas
