Frage von Belize:When I click on \u003ca href=\
Antwort von Axel:
Will the eighth time strongly on the standard mode. So far, I know him only out of necessity, via the "iA". Negative to me is not pushed open. \u003cbr /\u003e We should write properties that are noticed in certain modes, particularly, in this thread. What are there collected, can be very useful, perhaps more than mere "laboratory" comparisons. My contribution: with Cinema receives one especially in low light sometimes banding (I know, low light and Nostalgic is undisputed, I am not saying that the gold is worth watching).
Antwort von pilskopf:
I am currently synonymous longer standard is great, I tend now synonymous rather too soft or standard. Nostalgic I will probably not take more because it makes the degrees generally heavier, which is enclosed but still kind of chic. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Axel try, sometimes the WB shift with 3 down and 1 left. I mean I get a correct WB than if you go right into the blue, sometimes green is namely this rather billow over what does not fit all.
Antwort von Axel:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von Belize:
\u003cspan style=\
Antwort von Filmo:
If you now "standard" is used, how are your settings bzgl.Contrast, sharpness, saturation or noise reduction? \u003cbr /\u003e Had so far (for nature shots) Cinema used.
Antwort von pilskopf:
Hard to say, I'm testing more the hack of Orion Driftwood, I imagine there Contrast -2, Sharpness +2 Color to 0 to -2 and Rush \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I eh entrausche only with neatvideo.
Antwort von PaterIltis:
Quick side question: To what extent are the various movie modes GH1 and GH2 comparable between? I would of course as GH1 owners benefit of your experience like ;)
Antwort von pilskopf:
I actually thought that they are identical. Mweak around here would have to know the two had, I started with the first of 2.
Antwort von krokymovie:
\u003chtml\u003e\u003cdiv class=\