Frage von Blacksheep:
Moin Moin,
The sheep from the dike greets first all-knowing
I am mitm Latin s.end ...
In Gema things change so quickly in this day and age a lot.
to my problem.
I run a pub since about 40 years
For 6 years I have installed approximately synonymous one stage there
where smaller groups usually street musicians, as well as synonymous Eko Meble outlets have cover bands you can afford to offer to look.
these are of course synonymous with the reported gema.
My kundne ask me but now increasingly looking for the possibility
of this concert, only to get an audio recording
Theoretically yes no theme ..
outputs the mixer has so ...
I have now synonymous a Lightscribe burner you could even graphically a little spice.
We are talking here of about 50-10 cd's per concert
if at all ..
The revenues from it would be up to the back payment
the musicians handed to gage
does not want me so this really enrich
behind our backs is something like ne klasse werbung
a for the musician
and b, of course, for my pub
I hope one or the other can help me a little.
I thanks you in any case scho times ahead.
your sheep, määähhhh
Antwort von einsiedler:
With such a Mini edition is the question of whether we should hang the "s.ie great bell." Otherwise: There are only real cover versions, that is enacted 1:1, with no changes allowed Arrangement and without text changes. But this has nothing to do with the Gema, but with the publishers. Furthermore, it is of course only with the consent of the musicians / bands. Each edition must first be registered with Gema. On CD, or cover must be called upstream and-publishers.
Pretty much effort for 5-10 CD's.
I would steer clear, you are applying the vswenn or it becomes known.
Just my opinion.
Antwort von domain:
In my opinion, represents the Gema's only the financial interests of artists. But if you own them with some (s.besten written) the Gema remains sidelined and has absolutely nothing say.
But it must be a case of course, own productions and not enacted pieces.
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
The spirit of half-knowledge haunts again:) domain, what you write is complete bullshit, sorry, because every GEMA member has an exclusive management agreement with GEMA, is there nothing with nap:) Oh yes, and on the cover you have to print garnix, synonymous is nonsense, hermit.
To the point ...
As long as the bands play their own songs or cover versions of 1:1, you can fully absorb the stuff and stress-register with the GEMA. Deserves The rate is X% of the sale price but at least Y EUR. Let there be times 30-50 cents.
The publisher is not required here three times, the musicians do not. GEMA is an association of authors and their publishers, not for the musicians, but, there's a GVL and have not synonymous Urheberrechete to exploit.
The publisher is only required when umtexten the bands cover songs or rearrange, strictly speaking, there must agree to the publisher or the author - but this is absolutely a chance. Make's you can still where no plaintiff because no judge, because I think it was of interest to anyone whether umgetextet for 20 Discs burned something, if they do, you have just had bad luck and must be due to a dispute of 5 EUR brought to justice . Can happen, and then you have no chance:)
At the Great bell I would hang on every case, because if you sign not to GEMA, it is copyright infringement, misappropriation and fraud and the GEMA vedonnern you will eventually show and by estimate for payment. It will not take so long until your competitors just to wait, right?
MB
And for outside lawyers since the subtle: It was only my opinion, not legal advice!
Antwort von einsiedler:
You can just google times for "copyright law" in order "to expose nonsense";)
@ Domain:
It must then act not only to its own material, but of his own works, and the artists / authors may not have permission then contract with the Gema (affects only) have. If so, then you're right, a reproduction of Gema should still be reported.
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
@ Domain:
It must then act not only to its own material, but of his own works, and the artists / authors may not have permission then contract with the Gema (affects only) have. If so, then you're right, a reproduction of Gema should still be reported. You confused, like many other synonymous, author with artist. The artists have s.Hut with GEMA nullkommanixgarnichts, unless they are also synonymous composers or lyricists, so author.
---
Classically regarded composers and lyricists get their work in the form of notes on paper, the publisher sells the paper on behalf of those licenses and collects the GEMA / margins for the copying of the document or just when the public performance of works written on paper. Who performs this is so totally no first preference (keyword: artist), so long as he pays the license fees s.die GEMA. Because the management agreement between authors / publishers and the GEMA GEMA exclusive right of this license s.jeden x-any award. So you have to ask anyone if I may try to notify you only have.
According to exclude everything that has to do with recorded music, because it has the artists and labels, the rights, not the GEMA.
If you understand this principle time, many issues of very declare itself
MB
... synonymous here, not legal advice, only my "ignorant" opinion.
Antwort von einsiedler:
Authors are therefore not an artist?
After 20 years of living as a professional musician, producer, and 14 years as a composer and lyricist Gemamitgliedschaft with several publishing contracts, I really need no explanation in these things.
It is synonymous on how we understand a Posting WILL.
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
If you are as long active in the music business, then you synonymous know that, in the parlance of this business, the authors not be called artists, but writers. Artists are called singers and bands on the labels so that no one wants to deny the authors their artistic skills. Usual business is simple. No reason, then, to the insulted liver sausage
. Play
Moreover, the statement was not you alone, but to other interested parties in the forum, since it does not plan any of these things as much as you
MB
Antwort von gunman:
Hi,
So I do not understand anything, but exactly why I love this forum: There are really people who can get to the point.
I hate half-truths synonymous, though, for already!
Gunman
Antwort von einsiedler:
It's really synonymous to bring the issue to the point. If you titled the post other than nonsense and bullshit, but now we come other times on the head and receives its corresponding reactions. The forum is just like life, everyone has a different language. Just like on the road.
But I think eh not that interested in our questioner nor in any way. He is now likely to decide between three alternatives:
sleep 1) Sleeping Dogs can, but now the awareness of the risks
or
2) make everything official,
or
3) rather than with live CD's commitment to promote go-go girls:)
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
It's just nonsense nunmal that you print author and publisher of the envelope must, as you can get out and her writhe as you like.
MB
Antwort von einsiedler:
OK, again for everyone:
Marc is right and I am wrong.
Believe me nothing, I have no idea * bow *
Antwort von MarcBallhaus:
Well, it goes.
MB
Antwort von bArtMan:
In cover versions must always be the author and the publishers are given. Whatever claims this camera fuzzy here.
