Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Germany. A Summer Fairytale "on DV rotated Of thomas - 4 oct 2006 09:45:00 Yesterday, the Of Sönke Wortmann had during the 2006 World Cup turned film "Germany. A summer fairy tale" about the German team in Berlin premiere, tomorrow Releasedate throughout the country. As he says in an interview, Wortmann has the bulk of the film as 1 man camera crew with his Panasonic DVX shot 100 from the source - and a DV cam was for him a logical choice because he wanted to remain agile and close s.seinen actors. From more than 100 hours of film source material was cut up into several phases to ultimately 108 minutes. We are excited about the quality of the gefazten to film video footage. And of course the movie. And here's another
list to news reporting
Antwort von Axel:
A tip: Sitting far back as possible. Directly in front of the screen, the film is quite blurred. If there is a digital presentation, take it. That in addition Wortmann synonymous nor Frank Griebe made camera, probably explains a lot. The camera's just only a tool ...
Antwort von der inhalt macht den film:
we are yet again at the theme that good content to sell as synonymous. whether the content in summer is a good fairy but I do not judge. However, there is always a "technical" lower schmerzgrenze.
seriously
Antwort von prem:
saw him yesterday. naja was good, but you would have more draus can do. sorry.
in terms of 2.kamera. have seen only one incision. And indeed when it is a fun shoot 11er in the regeneration trainingslager went. there were a total of Elevated from one angle. think it was digi beta or something. But a giant was different :-)
Now I wonder why he did not jat with a hdv rotated? can tell me the time one? I mean, he wanted to bring it to the cinema anyway. who has since advised him there? is mir echt nen teasers.
clear that with the P2 cards is almost impossible. But hdv tapes? That would have been perfect, right?
ah .. And he has often blinded with automatic rotated. nu will not, as it was important. to ss torhüter from the tunnel into the stadium ran. washed .... All überstrehlt :-)
But nevertheless blazed seen. So there rinnn.
gruss,
thorsten
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
I was in the movies ...
Bin there, look out for myself a documentary that with a handy 25p DV camcorder has been made and learn something ...
To cut the drama and you have to say much, because the filmed events spoke for themselves ...
The film has s.sich liked ...
As it stands with the quality:
- Many blurred images, as there is no suspense but a steady tripod stick has been used, each step of the cameraman by proposing fully ...
- Background Sharpness: nil ...
- Lowlight: smoking picture when shooting in dark hotel halls. Good image quality in the players with better cabin lighting ...
- Colors looked dull: s.vielen agencies ...
- Motion blur ...
- Wabbernder background when panning
- Focus in general: I would have expected more ...
- Film-Look: of which I could see nothing at all
Do not understand why the film is not with an HDV camcorder has been rotated for the cinema version. For television and the DVD sales might have been herunterkonvertieren.
Conclusion: The Pana DVX 100 camcorder is already counting on professional equipment, probably would be when shooting with a consumer DV camcorder to film in the movies have been a fiasco.
As we heard yesterday, is the film later this year will be shown on television.
Antwort von Axel:
- Film-Look: of which I could see nothing at all The film had probably been originally planned only for television. ME is a film look a purely aesthetic criteria. With 35mm film cameras in technical terms would have been better, but it lacked immediacy. The players said in the ARD film about the premiere, they had forgotten after a while that even a camera was there.
Do not understand why the film is not with an HDV camcorder has been rotated for the cinema version. For television and the DVD sales might have been herunterkonvertieren. For sport shooting HDV is only limited use because of the time compression. Since it would at least have to be full frames, and the JVC HD 100 or the Canon XL-H1 in turn are no hand-held cameras. I would have expected that the Panasonic HVX was used 200th But it was, as I said, planned as a television documentary.
Conclusion: The Pana DVX 100 camcorder is already counting on professional equipment, probably would be when shooting with a consumer DV camcorder to film in the movies have been a fiasco. I had the nerve to say the opposite. Only in certain subjects, the audience expects a hi-resolution.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
With the HDR-HC3, I have a football and a basketball game (Hall included!). Forth from the picture quality that is a class better than the film of Sönke Wortmann ...
Had with the compression of the material in the native editing as yet no problems.
Antwort von deepcode:
Sönke wanted to draw on this project it is certainly a well-known and best camera. If you have such a device where you know 100% where you have to hinfassen - even in the biggest mess or stress situation - then that makes total sense.
Imagine you messing the recording of your life just because you the crucial moment as the gain almost a panic - Switches can not find! Is trivial, but certainly a major reason.
Purely technically, he would have gone with a Z1 certainly a lot better - Doku already allows some video look without devaluing, and with a few settings in the gamma and some filters in my mail may Z1 filmlike synonymous rather look to the much higher average Resolutiondie leaves much room , 16:9, and the almost noise-free gain.
I have only seen a clip from the film on my PAL ollen Television and because it looked despite DVX but rather videol out and also very soft. But ok, crew cabin and everything white fluorescent lamps - Such a motive is not just synonymous grateful.
Antwort von deepcode:
With the HDR-HC3, I have a football and a basketball game (Hall included!). Forth from the picture quality that is a class better than the film of Sönke Wortmann ...
Had with the compression of the material in the native editing as yet no problems. I can confirm. Soccer Tournament few test shots - a flat panel when you fall out of the eyes, and you may not want to believe that the pictures taken of this little cam.
The artifacts will find grouse hunters always sure what to viewers interested to zero - just a sharp, brilliant picture.
HDV is just brill, despite its shortcomings, the very easily available and cheap tapes motion.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Idle and pointless discussion. Wen interested untested HDV cameras with teething? Nobody is filming something with a camera, cost of dropouts in half a second. And the look of the HDV cameras not synonymous does not fit, they wanted no direct video look sharp, but a dokumetarischen, real observers do not notice the one that is there. Why just amateurs interested in something like this just a technical image quality and resolution? The pieces are not interested if the handling and the ergonomics of shit! The DVX is the handling, maturity, your HDV features superior cheese. A Z1 would have been the only alternative, only the problems with dropouts, and has needed forever, until it is running. If there are several weeks in important situations, turns around and it shall be made, take just a camera, is the one currently rules and made sure. The small and unobtrusive, and is deployed quickly, is when you can really zoom, etc ...
Antwort von SportRally:
Completely true PowerMAC,
But anyway HDV was never intended for professional or semi-professional applications. So why the fuss?
If the BBC or various documentary uses this format at all times, then they have probably have had times in the first place, the low cost in mind
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Schaut Euch mal the video stop at the movies, the picture quality is really on a very low level earlier movies. Euch doch mal Guckt to the HDTV demos of FIFA ASTRA ... just fun watching the stadium to ...
So long ...
Antwort von PowerMac:
What does the thing? Nothing.
Antwort von Axel:
Schaut Euch mal the video stop at the movies, the picture quality is really on a very low level earlier movies. Euch doch mal Guckt to the HDTV demos of FIFA ASTRA ... just fun watching the stadium to ... We write past each other. No one denies that HDV is sharper. But this is only
one property. HD
T V (World Cup) on Premiere is (for large projections of football almost a must, otherwise you see in the totals only green spots glimmering with what has previously suffered anyway). They recognize no other details.
For more intimate handheld camera, interactive camera work and plenty of exercise makes the eagle eye, but flabby. Whosoever does not see that's does not want to see.
Antwort von SportRally:
Idle and pointless discussion. Wen interested untested HDV cameras with teething? Nobody is filming something with a camera, cost of dropouts in half a second. And the look of the HDV cameras not synonymous does not fit, they wanted no direct video look sharp, but a dokumetarischen, real observers do not notice the one that is there. Why just amateurs interested in something like this just a technical image quality and resolution? The pieces are not interested if the handling and the ergonomics of shit! The DVX is the handling, maturity, your HDV features superior cheese. A Z1 would have been the only alternative, only the problems with dropouts, and has needed forever, until it is running. If there are several weeks in important situations, turns around and it shall be made, take just a camera, is the one currently rules and made sure. The small and unobtrusive, and is deployed quickly, is when you can really zoom, etc ... Rarely heard such a nonsense, sorry .. except, of course, are primarily content, story and idea.
Of course, the format debate is pointless, but here presented as the Holy Grail DV and HDV lambast .. almost farcical.
Both are in fact technically inferior consumer formats. The same time were synonymous tirades against DV. Now, everybody takes her and thinks that is the greatest.
> Who are interested untested HDV cameras with teething?
The Z1 is now tested much. And what of children's diseases you speak? Lack of "Film Look for Dummies" button?
> The DVX is the handling, maturity, your HDV features superior cheese.
Nonsense with sauce. Just because a DVX is a little act differently than a Z1 .. Both can work well, you know it must be flat.
> only has problems with dropouts and takes forever to run it.
Nonsense. Used in 5 productions, including 2 Making Of's, approx 50h equipment with ZERO dropouts and if the cam is running on standby in a few seconds. Of course, lasted longer if wegschaltet the drive, with all tape - cameras. For the Z1, however, one should use the HDV or Pro Tapes. My little private Cam - HC-3 - in contrast, runs perfectly and with the cheap dropoutfrei Maxell - Tapes.
> Why just amateurs interested in something like this just a technical> quality and resolution?
Did not that I'm not at an amateur. thanks for the hint.
Some viewers tend to be synonymous in movies übrigends s.einer some spice and plasticity enjoy the pictures. There's HDV to DV, in particular the relatively low-resolution DVX, certainly an advantage.
"If there are several weeks in important situations and turns around> it shall be made, take just a camera, is the one made currently rules and> for that.
100 & agree. I think that's synonymous has verwednet the reason why Sönke the DVX.
> The is small and unobtrusive and quick to deploy, is where you can zoom right> ... etc.
When you the next time a Z1 in the hands (think what you IMO have never done before) then turning the once funny little lever forward s.Lens. Ui, then guckst But you - Zoom!
And, true, 5 cm longer than the DVX - that changed the situation, of course, totally.
IMO it sounds like someone who still bought for a lot of Money is one DVX 100B and now the time of this notice the grandiose but Cam just passes by.
Still missing now is the native 16:9 is shit and the intimate, direct look only with the classic 4:3 can be achieved .. * g *
One more small thing: When I turn with the Z1 1080 50i I have already been useful in a field by simply SD - Progressive, with a Resolutiondie is still higher than the DVX omitted. If I was limited to SD I get from the i - a perfect material at any time Fields2Frame 1:2 slow motion. By the by. Nice feature, especially for documentation.
Antwort von PowerMac:
(...) HD T V (World Cup) on Premiere is (for large projections of football almost a must, otherwise you see in the totals only green spots glimmering with what has previously suffered anyway). They recognize no other details. (...) That is not exactly true. With increasing viewing distance, humans perceive no increased Resolutionmehr. There is a limit, which is mathematically composed of visual acuity, viewing distance, pixel resolution and the screen sizes. In a medium distance to a public viewing projection can be 10,000 to 8000 as the image resolution and it would have just as sharp at 768x576. Why does HDTV in Media Markt synonymous so sharp, because it stands in front of it and the higher Resolutionsieht, only the front does not match the typical situation of the average viewer. Those who are interested, I wrote about HDTV, a scientific work in which it is exactly that.
Antwort von SportRally:
Schaut Euch mal the video stop at the movies, the picture quality is really on a very low level earlier movies. Euch doch mal Guckt to the HDTV demos of FIFA ASTRA ... just fun watching the stadium to ...
We write past each other. No one denies that HDV is sharper. But this is only one property. HD T V (World Cup) on Premiere is (for large projections of football almost a must, otherwise you see in the totals only green spots glimmering with what has previously suffered anyway). They recognize no other details.
For more intimate handheld camera, interactive camera work and plenty of exercise makes the eagle eye, but flabby. Whosoever does not see that's does not want to see. The main problem with all these cams is still much too high, the depth of field. If I have relatively sharp points or eyes leadership in the picture the eye responds very differently. A DVX with a 35mm adapter produced by these ratios subjectively superior images, synonymous if the entire picture is relatively soft.
Picture what a "flat" only draws an edge zone looks the same Resolutionmatschig.
You should read some good discussions and solving of these formats simply stop taking from what is there. HDV has several advantages over IR, so I take it for her low budget. Should we not make religion come of it.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Idle and pointless discussion. Wen interested untested HDV cameras with teething? Nobody is filming something with a camera, cost of dropouts in half a second. And the look of the HDV cameras not synonymous does not fit, they wanted no direct video look sharp, but a dokumetarischen, real observers do not notice the one that is there. Why just amateurs interested in something like this just a technical image quality and resolution? The pieces are not interested if the handling and the ergonomics of shit! The DVX is the handling, maturity, your HDV features superior cheese. A Z1 would have been the only alternative, only the problems with dropouts, and has needed forever, until it is running. If there are several weeks in important situations, turns around and it shall be made, take just a camera, is the one currently rules and made sure. The small and unobtrusive, and is deployed quickly, is when you can really zoom, etc ...
Rarely heard such a nonsense, sorry .. except, of course, are primarily content, story and idea.
Of course, the format debate is pointless, but here presented as the Holy Grail DV and HDV lambast .. almost farcical.
Both are in fact technically inferior consumer formats. The same time were synonymous tirades against DV. Now, everybody takes her and thinks that is the greatest.
> Who are interested untested HDV cameras with teething?
The Z1 is now tested much. And what of children's diseases you speak? Lack of "Film Look for Dummies" button?
> The DVX is the handling, maturity, your HDV features superior cheese.
Nonsense with sauce. Just because a DVX is a little act differently than a Z1 .. Both can work well, you know it must be flat.
> only has problems with dropouts and takes forever to run it.
Nonsense. Used in 5 productions, including 2 Making Of's, approx 50h equipment with ZERO dropouts and if the cam is running on standby in a few seconds. Of course, lasted longer if wegschaltet the drive, with all tape - cameras. For the Z1, however, one should use the HDV or Pro Tapes. My little private Cam - HC-3 - in contrast, runs perfectly and with the cheap dropoutfrei Maxell - Tapes.
> Why just amateurs interested in something like this just a technical> quality and resolution?
Did not that I'm not at an amateur. thanks for the hint.
Some viewers tend to be synonymous in movies übrigends s.einer some spice and plasticity enjoy the pictures. There's HDV to DV, in particular the relatively low-resolution DVX, certainly an advantage.
"If there are several weeks in important situations and turns around> it shall be made, take just a camera, is the one made currently rules and> for that.
100 & agree. I think that's synonymous has verwednet the reason why Sönke the DVX.
> The is small and unobtrusive and quick to deploy, is where you can zoom right> ... etc.
When you the next time a Z1 in the hands (think what you IMO have never done before) then turning the once funny little lever forward s.Lens. Ui, then guckst But you - Zoom!
And, true, 5 cm longer than the DVX - that changed the situation, of course, totally.
IMO it sounds like someone who still bought for a lot of Money is one DVX 100B and now the time of this notice the grandiose but Cam just passes by.
Still missing now is the native 16:9 is shit and the intimate, direct look only with the classic 4:3 can be achieved .. * g *
One more small thing: When I turn with the Z1 1080 50i I have already been useful in a field by simply SD - Progressive, with a Resolutiondie is still higher than the DVX omitted. If I was limited to SD I get from the i - a perfect material at any time Fields2Frame 1:2 slow motion. By the by. Nice feature, especially for documentation. Tell me no shit. I myself have a DVX and one Z1. The DVX I've already bought a few years ago as an "A" version.
K
Antwort von SportRally:
So I can only say that you come across the one hand, extremely aggressive, but none of your statements can ultimately be justified. All statements and Recycled pure prejudice. As I said none of the cams and no format is perfect.
But I am no preference, I come with both formats just fine, but by default in our environment, only HDV is used. Benefits simply outweigh synonymous when SD is usually the end product.
I do not know whether synonymous specifically, the film would look better in HD 16:9. I've noticed in the excerpts only the Picture A) looked like mush and B not much) from the "DVX-look" stopped over. So from an aesthetic here is not very appealing, but cheap. that's all
> PS. I think you still have had a DVX in hand, otherwise you'd know> that its optics and zoom are coupled to the manual> Generations useful in documentary work than the "power of the Z1E.
he is. But certainly not for generations. Reißzoom I get with the Z1 out not - is halt so.
In this sense - a lot of success yet.
Antwort von r.p.television:
Interesting that I am not the only one that employs the theme of the HD (T) V and SD so. Since there is apparently asking for opinions, I will once synonymous give my two cents.
Must say that I welcome the progress towards HD and HDV very synonymous, and I've gained so for small productions, a Canon XL-H1. Before and (still) I had with a SONY DSR-370 DVCAM rotated.
One is after the initial hookup FULL HD panel (with s.ein 1920x1080 physical resolution) via HDMI total of HDV really excited and can not get enough at all. But I can remember when I was of professional S-VHS (JVC) have switched to DV, I was quite happy with no more color noise (- yeah).
But after one has high s.The Resolutiongewöhnt disturbs one very quickly but sometimes s.The defective movement representation with HDV. Even when the going slow pans Resolutionsichtbar in the basement. Whether it's on plasma, LCD and high-resolution tubes - the Picture splinted to each pan speed and detail of the image significantly (although many claim the Effect of them had not yet or only marginally been noticed).
The Picture is Even when shooting with a static camera axis splint extreme, if, for example, a group of people dance in front of the camera or on and (abhüpft such as at a World Cup party) and the background in movement is synonymous. Worst then connect the artifacts at concerts or in nightclubs, with effect when light is working, ie when changing the background color of the frame to frame one has extreme gradients in the artifacts.
This deficiency makes for professional HDV applications questionable.
It is interesting how much quality in the future, "sent" is. For SD broadcasts, it fell so far to little, if this was s.Werkeln Digibeta or DVCam. The Sendeniveau at Premiere Discovery HD is variable, but generally very good.
But very intessant was an episode of "American Chopper - Making of".
Here, I realized that was the reality-soap on the HVX900 DVC PRO HD equipment of Panasonic rotated. A protagonist (Mikey) was filming with his private HDV camera in between (a SonyZ1), and the material used was of the editors.
Surprisingly - although there probably extreme in the post the colors, contrast and gamma curve has been matched - the picture was not here in the basement, but was partly due to the excellent autofocus sometimes sharper than the Z1 shots of DVC Pros when the cameraman not because of its very high resolution viewfinder was a few cm from the focal point.
Allderdings was here with the HDV takes the picture is not very moving, but usually an actor was great in the picture - no pans, no zooms.
And that should be synonymous, the trick if you want to shoot with HDV for broadcast material. No pans, no zooms, no bobbing crowd (with flags Done Wenke and Feuerwerkskorpern). None of the viewers probably would look (and even professionals do not immediately) the difference between HDV and HD Cam or DVC PRO HD.
Anyway, I'm happy with HDV than with the old PAL Gematsche without the possibility of a composition with detailed resolution.
But I'm not completely happy because of the lack of movement representation.
But I have (HD) tasted blood, and when my wallet allows, I'll indulge me a SonyXD Cam HD. Which allows for best quality (35MBits) a recording time of about 60min on a blue ray disc and has a much better representation of movement. The format is suitable for broadcast-hesitation HD production, HDV, I'm not so sure, because even slow panning landscape here vermatschen in Comparison to HD Cam and synonymous stink off from the HD broadcast quality HD at Discovery.
My Conclusion:
HDV is certainly better than DV, but in Comparison to earlier times was a good SD DV more competitive than today Digibeta HDV to HD Cam / CineAlta or DVC PRO HD / Varicam (not the HVX200 with pixel shift).
HDV is for the smaller budget certainly the best step into the new age of television, but who is demanding an across-s.The image quality and image quality as it used intends to DV (without Auflösungseinbr
Antwort von Axel:
Personally, I probably would have rather opted for a Z1 with Cine Gamma. You have to stop then shoot HDV referred - that is, as mentioned - no pans, zooms, and thought no motive clippings. Then go into the film and see that the reason why Every day, thousands flock to the cinemas and, apart of the poor pigs in the orchestra seats are thrilled: Instead of stringing together a leisurely stadium long shots we have a very agile and intimate camera ( "Poldicam"). I myself was interested in the film only its effect of her, I'm not a very big football fan. I see every week, many - mostly with the Z1 filmed - Industrial and economic features, trade show and promotional films, all tripod and ultimately moderately animated stills, thoughtful
design cutouts precisely. The time is tough in HDV, and that goes against the grain with me as a film enthusiast. The ingratiation s.Movies-viewing habits by Cinegamma (this is a video gefaztes car replaced without taking it to, I think that one before Fazen rather the mean PAL should maintain gradation) is more what fans look for films on video.
With increasing viewing distance, humans perceive no increased Resolutionmehr. No opposition. But synonymous in the movies there are - relatively - short viewing distances. Who is still sitting in the back row sees a small picture and has no advantage over his home telly. It will take synonymous distanced the content, and can prove it, as field tests that reflect less accurate than spectators in front next.
Antwort von r.p.television:
@ axel:
I agree with you certainly right.
I contradict myself even if I really say that I probably would have chosen the Z1. But probably only because I had refused to take the step back to PAL to. Perhaps narrow-minded, but I'm working in both the private TV Gucken as synonymous with Rotate only grudgingly with PAL. Obowohl HDV for me is only a transitional compromise wide format.
I myself am a FAN of unchained shoulder camera. Without Tripod, with options for panning and spontaneous relocation.
If you have read my post, you reads out so that I like because of the limited usability of the HDV format only conditionally. Especially because I'd rather quick time movies of the shoulder as rigid s.Tripod to crouch down and breaking the zoom lens, I will switch to XD CAM HD. Have the reasons given so synonymous that speak against using a HDV.
What is clear is that 99% of Kinozuseher is pretty no preference on what was and how the film rotated. Many people know the difference between video and film does not synonymous.
As my football but not at all interested, I would stop only interested in how a film with (such expected number of visitors we speak of gefinisht 12 to 15 million visitors) has been.
've Already seen in some DV-movies movies that looked very flat. A pleasant surprise was "28 hours later," which was on a XL1s with 35mm converter of P + S filmed and was matched in the post with nice color effect, and gamma curve.
Whether it is a normal PAL-Graduation Fazen for the beautiful pictures, ultimately still remains Geschmacksssache. I'm glad that we finally, after decades of video look at the video are going on.
'm Curious to see if there are 15 years post-plug-ins that will simulate the old video look ;-)
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
... that to me just because of the limited usability of the HDV format only partially precipitated. As an amateur filmmaker had in five months HDV recording and editing practices to determine any restrictions on my previous habits with DV. On the contrary, such a beautiful video quality raw material I had never, as now with HDV.
Antwort von Axel:
Hello Bruno.
You're probably lucky that you've always been very quiet filmed, already synonymous with DV. HDV is used in different types of documentaries (see above), synonymous in Geography - documentaries. I accept simple du film very detached from the tripod. A mountain view, a production line, the view of the playing field: That was created as HDV. On my last vacation in a Cretan mountain village's I would have preferred. Goats and chickens, and in true peace of mind moving people, the bluest sky, we have seen.
Antwort von r.p.television:
@ bruno
Sure HDV offers the finest raw materials so far all consumer video format. But it does not offer the same picture quality as a linear time DV, as PAL or SD Resolutionnoch was state of affairs.
I will not miss synonymous HDV, but only because I can afford nothing better yet. A step back to DV or DVCAM or Beta SP / SX / Digi no longer comes into question, except ENG halt in daily life as a working tool.
But would in the private vacation just shoot HDV.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
The HDV material provides me as much more quality reserves s.um with one Deshaker (SteadyMove in P-Pro 2.0) quite outstanding results in "Bobble Clips" in post production to achieve later still, or align reinzuzoomen Clips and easy. With DV footage they had to no good cards.
Antwort von Demi:
The HDV material provides me as much more quality reserves s.um with one Deshaker (SteadyMove in P-Pro 2.0) quite outstanding results in "Bobble Clips" in post production to achieve later still, or align reinzuzoomen Clips and easy. With DV footage they had to no good cards. Finally, the HDV-killer argument:
Simply draufhalten, "filmed" is in post processing. Three cheers to the effects :-)
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Good shots are s.erster place, of course!
But ..., HDV offers just for the two functions described to me of better opportunities than DV footage ...
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Addendum:
Anyone who possesses the relevant tool in the post-production (such as Premiere Pro 2.0), may at any time.
Antwort von Ein Mitarbeiter:
Hi!
The film has not been rotated to HDV, since this codec with fast movements like in the picture (or almost always ...) times "aufpixelt", ie the codec comes with complex picture changes quickly enough afterward (hence gibts in demo-images for example at trade fairs, etc. always only ever seen still images or slow pans. Only HD Cam or HD-Cam SR make sense! And these cameras were too bulky for the Project ...) In addition, one due to the higher resolution ( for the same space!) in the later color correction is much less possibilities! (DV: 25 frames per second, Sony HDV 2 frames per second, the remaining 23 images are included as ................)
Even with testing Fazungen before filming of the eventual difference in the Resolutionzwischen DV and HDV was marginal ... But DP had the better color reproduction (and) natural motion resolution.
Conclusion: HDV has ne tolle Resolutionwenn is exposed does not move too fast and always top, but then that's it been synonymous. Btw: the sound quality would be synonymous with HDV have been much less useful because of compressed than DV ...
Hope I could help, an employee
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
The film has not been rotated to HDV, since this codec with fast movements like in the picture (or almost always ...) times "aufpixelt", ie the codec comes with complex picture changes quickly enough afterward (hence gibts in demo-images for example at trade fairs, etc. always only ever seen still images or slow pans to. There were sporadic s.Anfang this problem with the first HDV camcorder, but not universal. So I've watched it at least before I bought myself a HDV camcorder. So you can sport shots and still make nöch without these effects described above.
I find it very unfortunate that HDV is not used. Yes I saw the DV film itself and the material quality is really my impression of YESTERDAY!
Antwort von PowerMac:
It is not about to shoot, but image quality.
Antwort von Kast&Oroff:
& EGOSHOOTER is an exquisite example for this ..
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
It is not about to shoot, but image quality. For me, this is to not only the implementation of the story ...
The cut was in this video does not "art" do or die ...
Antwort von Kast&Oroff:
Well, the issue HDV or DV has now been chewed enough.
This is synonymous to me personally rather unimportant.
Rather, I think that the hype around the Hr. Wortmann is a little too much of the good.
The report (in my eyes it's no movie, because I sit for a movie, a script advance, synonymous, no documentation, because that is advance research) is surely the content interesting, but let us be honest, it's not great art soch To make a film.
I find here in the forum can certainly make a handful of people to this movie as well.
But as for Otto-Normal-filmmaker was impossible as an I-can-überallhingehen-and-shoot to get right at the World Cup
Not Soenke FIlm has made special we, the people who celebrate and have our Nationalmanschafft.
Reportage (in my eyes it is not a movie, because I sit for a movie, a script advance, synonymous, no documentation, because that sets advance Search)
Do not get me wrong, it is interesting to watch. But it does not rise from the broad masses. There are more matters which are more on the content.
Antwort von Axel:
[... image quality ...]
For me, this is to not only the implementation of the story ...
The cut was in this video does not "art" do or die ... We draw envy from the back bench finally balance, and this is the interesting s.Thread and s.diskutierten film. How can a film so aesthetically poor and with no real story so unspectacular cut could have so much success?
The issue was guaranteed success, and it was a fairly simple theme, a big hoopla about "The round must be in the Square." Now, we went just a matter of tackling the entire right, avoiding the topic. Even the "soundtrack" was obvious, and although Xavier Herbert and simply has to find good, keep it just football hit.
Find appropriate concepts is the most important. Mundane issues on which I would count the daily highlights of most amateurs, a lot of yearning pimped too often.
Pimp my life is the magic formula, the digital box of tricks then ensures that works can often synonymous overlong just before your eyes grace. The result: Videos of tappsigen infants end up in the "margins Show," exposing the eyes of the world conqueror in the "exotic" vacation setting him as a philistine, and most other nature films never leave the hard drive, right in the very idea that they ere no interest to you. And then HDV, which dissolves the sadness still merciless.
I would argue that films should have a meaning. I am particularly grateful, if one little thing is synonymous done in a small film. If there is a point when anger, joy, fear, or otherwise comes across any strong feeling: Wow!
I would start a deeper analysis of "summer fairy tale at all."
Antwort von derpianoman:
Hi!
I must confess that I'm a fan of the movie. Have it in movies, in the
TV on DVD, and now synonymous (with the extras, but not so
"dense" are seen). And he has me already to two of my movies
Young (E-Jugend) inspired ...
In your discussion of the used camera lagt you already
quite correct. Have something edited together, what I have
Send as an mp3 via email if interested can. LG Klaus
Antwort von PowerMac:
Email? Mp3? Movie? ? Send Used Camera?
Do everything does not make sense ...
Antwort von derpianoman:
I am sending you (and others) happy too.
Let yourself be surprised, already there is a reason
why I did not say I've edited together WHAT ...
... "For educational purposes only" ... ;-)
Antwort von derpianoman:
PS For me it was interesting for you, the more likely to be
slightly ;-) LAHM. But they are of the source. This Threat
yes with Rätzelraten went (why SW has made no better camera) los ...
