Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Glidecam HD-1000 floating tripod for cameras up to 1.4 kilograms of rudi - 31 May 2009 13:10:00 For cameras up to 1.4 kg weight is suspended, the tripod s.sofort Glidecam HD-1000 available from the German distributor Marcotec for just under 350 euros. Here you will find in this small system synonymous many features that have so far been found only in the large Glidecam (; include: adjustable headstock by rotary mechanism) Camera integrated adapter plate, sliding base plate. The system should be set up without tools.
This is an auto-generated entry
This is news to report with pictures and link to the pages slashCAM Magazine
Antwort von pilskopf:
Particularly fast in case you are indeed not. : D
Great part. No, it does not need tools that can be done easily Glidecam small to be on the main frame s.dem the handle.
But very well made and very stylish and much smaller than you imagine. Even cameramen look surprised when one of them so rumturnt.
I stumbled a few times, not flown, but bad come to stutter and the recording was nothing to see, is s.dem weight of the arm can be easily compensated quickly. Recommended each thinks that include a video would have to move, because otherwise one would have to be synonymous photographer.
Antwort von Mr. B:
The time now is perhaps a rather silly question, but it's burning me to hold his tongue, because I would like to build a similar thing itself:
What it really is, what is balanced, the Camera? Is untendran the design with the weight or is there somewhere a spring dampens the shocks?
The internet is so often instructions on how to be approximately 20 ® builds itself sowas (, usually a pole with a net bottom and a handle) - this is ¬ 350-Glidecam really synonymous for 18 times better?
Antwort von pilskopf:
No, no pen, just the counterweight. This is what you'll find on the net for 20 ¬ no Steadis rather than aids to stabilize the Cam, which is synonymous, but is not a Comparison to the function of a Steadicam.
Building your own will, but still as good as you'll never own it hinbekommen. Not in the quality, the ease in the precise function and the simple handling. However you will pay synonymous a good price, cheap is something else, clearly. But it is definitely worth who s.bewegten Picture Without Tripod likes. In Meier signal you'll find links to my Glidecam videos, so you can watch times. Have naturally longer filmed again but most of Tube taken.
The Glidecam is 20 times better than a homemade. I had previously built one like this poor Man steadies, as I said, so you can have good film but it is no Comparison to a real steadies. 20 times smoother.
Antwort von Mr. B:
Thanks for the reply, your videos can already see from quite impressive :-)
But I will still try first made profiles to see whether that's enough for me (already, it costs almost nothing), but if they differ too much of my results to yours, I will return to the product.
Antwort von pilskopf:
Do you as a cheap out of a small tripod. Have I made synonymous and works Great. But the disadvantages are obvious if one has Steadier these views into action, then one only remembers why they call it steadies and the Poor Mans version only tools that function is completely different.
I have for you again a video made in public, so you can watch times. I want to see that the hinbekommst you with your built environment.
Antwort von yakobusan:
I can only recommend this device synonymous. Although I have "only" a Chinese rip-off, also capture the difference of hand is to go back home.
In Gegnsatz a real Steadicam can, perhaps even starting the Image Stabilization, which you should try it, for me the recordings were then nearly perfect. And if one side was filmed and later to drüberwirft SmoothCam in Final Cut, you have a fake dolly ride! :)
Have fun, it's worth as much as buying a camera itself
Greeting
Jacob
Antwort von emzet:
mal ne question about this:
it is totally unrealistic, a Glidecam / Steadycam with s.der Camera (attached Tonkabel; XLR operate in order Tonangel) or get it the way somehow?
Antwort von pilskopf:
correctly identified, with the steadies utopian. Do not go, be free to float. Since I still recommend a separate recording device.
Antwort von 02VideoFaBI:
mal ne question about this:
it is totally unrealistic, a Glidecam / Steadycam with s.der Camera (attached Tonkabel; XLR operate in order Tonangel) or get it the way somehow? That should be no problem if the sound man bescheid knows in advance where it goes ... I think.
How does it look out with the U-Flycam? Would thus be making a similar outcome? The price difference is pretty big ...
Antwort von pilskopf:
It will not do much too sensitive, at least not with such a small steadies. It would be nonsense to a good German.
Antwort von yakobusan:
mal ne question about this:
it is totally unrealistic, a Glidecam / Steadycam with s.der Camera (attached Tonkabel; XLR operate in order Tonangel) or get it the way somehow? Go. 've Connected monitor with XLR Cable and rotated (; must be) easy nachbalancieren but as long as you take the thinnest cable and can play anything without pinching or pull, das is best but a radio receiver or the camera crew s.den on it, then it goes to 100%.
Antwort von pilskopf:
But not so with a slight Steadier with the Cam weighs 2 pounds. How difficult was your system and slow it? And how much harder was the lower weight? At least in a small way this will not work if that is set as desired. Why not change but the bottom of extremely heavy, it could go even synonymous, with all its negative consequences, including, of course. Thus, a floating system is allowed to float freely, films properly without errors and records the sound of a second cam on, for example.
Antwort von yakobusan:
But not so with a slight Steadier with the Cam weighs 2 pounds. How difficult was your system and slow it? And how much harder was the lower weight? At least in a small way this will not work if that is set as desired. Why not change but the bottom of extremely heavy, it could go even synonymous, with all its negative consequences, including, of course. Thus, a floating system is allowed to float freely, films properly without errors and records the sound of a second cam on, for example. That was with an EX1, which weighs 3.6 kilograms, I think. If the cable is too long and thick and therefore too heavy gibts problems, but the idea is indeed to balance the ... I think that is synonymous with lighter models. But anyway, the system's true: Practice makes perfect. Have a week or every day, 3 x 30 minutes or so until I trained really well was there.
Antwort von pilskopf:
This must be the one stop to know this little Steadier is already very fragile, if one were to combine with even a cable would have to Führungshabnd arg should be deployed, but that is what I would not even stop to get small errors in the Picture too. As an external solution would be 1000 times smarter and the cameraman problem could move freely and concentrate on the Picture and running.
Practice makes perfect, that's true. I have a couple of weeks until I finally used the correct adjustment. And the Glide comes as the car running right with the times. With such a lightweight, but it would be generally easier than with such an EX and correspondingly large steadies.
Antwort von yakobusan:
With such a lightweight, but it would be generally easier than with such an EX and correspondingly large steadies. Well, the heavier, more stable. Should be easier to film them but not necessarily long "quiet move", right? If you ever shoulder shots of a Camera with a 20kg or so EX1 compare ... As a world away in between;)
If as much weight as possible below draufpacken, hehe.
Antwort von pilskopf:
So while running you should shoot with this Glidcam without arm and vest better than with a heavy system with no arm. Although I already synonymous with dozens of videos of Systems've seen the jacket were not really good and clean, that you get with this system faster and easier way than with a liquid and usually a large, unwieldy system. But the price is just that the cams have the appropriate quality so much weight.
Below as little weight as possible, I say. : D I would be stupid not west a Glidecam system artificially weighed more than necessary. Synonymous but it always depends what you want to do with the system. For a very fair walk to the front you should not s.sehen on and and do the time with a lot of weight and without the vest, with this lightweight system is not a problem unless you are trying synonymous with running.
Antwort von ghostpictures.de:
Mal ne Had Glidcam 2000 Pro with my FX1000.
Without arms, and no waistcoat.
Did they then sold again.
For small single-handed steady cams ne might be good but over 5 nseinem arms hell are.
Antwort von Mr. B:
404ERR
Antwort von pilskopf:
Oh yes, we see rushing, had the Cam synonymous but there is not optimally adjusted. There is no gain control, and that is so disgusting. Otherwise, I would recommend Cam often because they do not even as bad as its reputation. At least the quality is perfectly adequate for many things but it makes the best pictures in good light. Has beautiful colors and the sound is synonymous not bad for internal microphone. The gain can be set only through the aperture, made stupid and unnecessary. But ne bad Cam is something else, after all, everything else can be set manual, the rest is up to the post production.
Antwort von Mr. B:
Ok clear rushing it a bit already, but you'd have time to see the shots of the JVC, there is s.Abend / in the night see more of the noise rather than from the actual picture, and this is no exaggeration:-D
Antwort von pilskopf:
I find the noise do not even that bad, gives the Picture including ne some grit and it does not come over so sterile, there must be synonymous halt on it. When one is down the aperture and shutter nen of 1 / 25 takes, you minimize the noise quite well. The gain will be affected with the Aperture in action.
Antwort von Zizi:
Ok clear rushing it a bit already, but you'd have time to see the shots of the JVC, there is s.Abend / in the night see more of the noise rather than from the actual picture, and this is no exaggeration:-D This is synonymous with the prosumers not much better if the leaves when Auto Gain!
Finally, if "yes dennen housed not synonymous magnifications sensor .. Only when there are 3 instead 1ner dennen halt.
I would be interested how the Glidecam with a 5D MkII is proposing?
Anyway, I think that you can build yourself loose!
That is totally wiedermal abzocke!
Tripod head for the front and push back: 30 ¬
Alustange: 3 ¬
Weights: 5 ¬
Tools such as drills, lathes, unless you've not at home: ~ 50 ¬
Know How: free
And I'm getting so nem part with the same result only stands Baumax halt drauf ..
Antwort von pilskopf:
Mach and'll be happy with.
Antwort von 02VideoFaBI:
Is the HD-1000 with a Glidecam (; significantly lower) U-Flycam to compare?
Antwort von pilskopf:
Is the HD-1000 with a Glidecam (; significantly lower) U-Flycam to compare? The Flycam is the Indian version of the Glidecam. The quality will not be bad but I can not say more synonymous. Basically, you need to pay attention to whether the head plate can be adjusted very finely by synonymous wheel. The system is very very sensitive, 1mm twist sRädchen and even lowers or tilts the cam a few degrees. I would not want to set as a cog and not a proper adjustment is very important, generally, the Glidecam is not set correctly, and really wonder about the user is then not so good results.
It is especially with the lead hand is often too much strain, which may in the large Steadis Cams with severe but are so lightweight you must handle like a raw egg, not recommended for Grobmotoriker too. So you have to go with Love Part s.das and then ran it beautifully, the one without Glidecam Smooth videos never have to rotate.
And as mentioned somewhere above, particularly attractive is the side-shoot which otherwise would be possible only with Dolly ner.
Antwort von Mr. B:
Hmm ... 110 ® does this thing? I think I leave the house design, this U-Flycam seems, according to various videos on Youtube and community contributions in the network to be quite good.
Then I need not merely a clever Microphone, the D90 is not exactly known for quality ^ ^
