Frage von Dennis Reinhardt:
Moin,
I have now in the cupboard next to some other things two small
8mm reels with historic recordings from the early days of
American marine zoos found. Somewhere I have
synonymous another dolphin-educational schools to 16mm I think
with magnetic or optical have.
Since I unfortunately neither 8mm or 16mm projector possess, but
an adequate 720p projector, I would like the three movies
can scan, originally had a DVD does, but
if you really have HD from 8mm film rausholen can, why not.
Three questions thus:
1. In 16mm so I can imagine there enough visual information
drinsteckt yet, but with 8mm ...? I've tried with and 3600dpi
Backlight images with the scanner collections ... Optics without any
Chance. It recognizes only outlines. :)
2. Nassabtastung yes or no? In Berola & co offer which is as
to non plus ultra, but I have records of Nassläufern
in memory, which could then synonymous away. Did the wet
Scanning really so many benefits which a possibly destroy the film
justify?
Last but not least: 3 Has someone already may be a positive experience
with a company regarding this done? price / performance and so?
The large coil 16mm film is something about 15 minutes, Standard
School supplies halt. The 8mm reels are probably 15 meters, so something
With 4 minutes. If the price is still within the framework, right?
Gruß, Dennis
Antwort von Wilko Finke:
Dennis Reinhardt wrote:
[...]
> Three questions, therefore:
>
> 1 In 16mm so I can imagine there enough visual information
> Drinsteckt yet, but with 8mm ...? I've tried with and 3600dpi
> Backlight images with the scanner collections ... Optics without any
> Chance. It recognizes only outlines. :)
You'll be surprised what you Berola as there may rausholen for
I have footage of the services which have often claimed
taken. Therefore a thick Recommendation of me!
> 2 Nassabtastung yes or no? In Berola & co offer which is as
> To non plus ultra, but I have records of Nassläufern
> In memory, which could then synonymous away. Did the wet
> Scanning really so many benefits which a possibly destroy the film
> Justified?
With the Nassabtastung get the whole race tracks and scratches
reduced. But I've always left it, was genuine. :)
The films are then not been destroyed (nice phrase synonymous!).
> Last but not least: 3 Has someone already may be a positive experience
> With a company regarding this done? price / performance and so?
Treasures times with max. 100 Questions You're in character. :)
http://www.berola.de/
Many greetings
Wilko
Antwort von Gerrit Brodmann:
Dennis Reinhardt
wrote:
> Three questions, therefore:
>
> 1 In 16mm so I can imagine there enough visual information
> drinsteckt yet, but with 8mm ...? I've tried with and 3600dpi
> Backlight images with the scanner collections ... Optics without any
> Chance. It recognizes only outlines. :)
"gegenlicht" means you have no Durchlichtscanner but himself
was "created"?
Because with a Durchlichtscanner there should already be getting what.
However, your scanner with no real security 3600 dpi ...
> 2 Nassabtastung yes or no? In Berola & co offer which is as
> to non plus ultra, but I have records of Nassläufern
> in memory, which could then synonymous away. Did the wet
> scanning really so many benefits which a possibly destroy the film
> justified?
So at least for the drum scanners, which scan film strips wet
one could still use the films, but they sometimes had to be
Scanflussigkeit rid of the (at least for the recommended storage
8-))
> Last but not least: 3 Has someone already may be a positive experience
> with a company regarding this done? price / performance and so?
>
> The large coil 16mm film is something about 15 minutes, Standard
> School supplies halt. The 8mm reels are probably 15 meters, so something
> with 4 minutes. If the price is still within the framework, right?
So previously it was quite expensive, since there were only a few, the special
Scanner had the individual record. If you have such a
Providers still find it is obviously the best. (Berola
seems to do that?)
Meanwhile, the film only from the most (with various tricks to
Improvement), such as the provider of Qalität certainly very
fluctuate ...
Is the question what it is worth to you ...
--
Photography and Still Image - Art from Brunswick
photography - art - sketches: http://gerrit.brodmann.com
Sexy does LARP - Medieval and Fantasy: http://derLARPfotograf.de
One Minute / Random photoArt: http://one-minute.info
Antwort von Dennis Reinhardt:
Gerrit Brodmann wrote:
> "Gegenlicht" means you have no Durchlichtscanner but himself
> What is "created"?
Yes, ne Luxeon LED with Difusor with his wire over the construct the film
hanged while the bottom of the scanner was s.Scannen. :)
Either the scanner is a dummy package (although the
dreitausendundnochwas DPI optical and not to be interpolated)
or he is simply not designed for something. LED Scanners
anyway seem certain disadvantages when compared with normal normal
Used to have. I think with its optics to the depth to
koregieren had the synonymous still halfway scanned, but all
Other than that even feasible to make a movie, this was
my attempt garnicht synonymous thought. :)
> Because with a Durchlichtscanner there should already be getting what.
> However, your scanner with no real security 3600 dpi ...
but yet, 3600dpi inner width, however, the engine in
The long direction only at 1600dpi exactly like me heranfahren
appears. So half Mogelpackung:)
> So at least for the drum scanners, which scan film strips wet
> Could still use the films, but they sometimes had to be
> Of the Scanflussigkeit liberate (at least for the recommended storage
> 8-))
Do I have to make themselves or the company itself because it already
clever? I would be like me not sure I should treat the film ...
Isopropanol would be too risky to try. : P
> So earlier it was quite expensive, since there were only a few, the special
> Scanner had the individual record. If you have such a
> Service still find it is obviously the best. (Berola
> Seems to do that?)
>
> Meanwhile, the film only from the most (with various tricks to
> Improvement), as there is Qalität provider of highly secure
> Fluctuate ...
>
> Is the question what it is worth to you ...
A euro or in any case. I think the ninth
with the HD-scanning advertises itself with the trust that its HD-Cam only
abzufilmen? Since then a number, I prefer what synonymous drauf. I would be synonymous
in 2k or 4k scanning leave if practicable and would not
infinitely expensive ... werweiß if not in 10 years the state of the art
is. : P
Gruß, Dennis
Antwort von Gerrit Brodmann:
Dennis Reinhardt wrote:
> Gerrit Brodmann wrote:
>
>> "Gegenlicht" means you have no Durchlichtscanner but himself
>> What is "created"?
>
> Yes, ne Luxeon LED with wire Difusor with nem construct on the film
> hanged while the bottom of the scanner was s.Scannen. :)
Oh woe 8-)
> Either the scanner is a dummy package (although the
> dreitausendundnochwas DPI optical and not to be interpolated)
Is he. Real Resolutions of the whole consumer flatbed scanners are
far below 2000dpi, depending on the model far below 1500.
> or it is simply not designed for something.
The synonymous. Because he has the light of the lower synonymous still continuing. Scanner,
the scanning is capable of shooting, turn the Auflichtlampe
from the sled and use only the transmitted light for the Filmscan.
...
>> Because with a Durchlichtscanner there should already be getting what.
>> However, your scanner with no real security 3600 dpi ...
>
> but yet, 3600dpi inner width, however, the engine in
> The long direction only at 1600dpi exactly like me heranfahren
> appears. So half Mogelpackung:)
He has not synonymous of 3600dpi Resolutionin Width. The only on
paper.
With the scanners is as similar as with the watt figures at Conrad
Compact plants. Since the theoretical maximum value of all individual
Components of a millisecond before Verglühen together and
as marked on the package written 8-)
>> So at least for the drum scanners, which scan film strips wet
>> Could still use the films, but they sometimes had to be
>> Of the Scanflussigkeit liberate (at least for the recommended storage
>> 8-))
>
> Do I have to make themselves or the company itself because it already
> smart? I would be like me not sure I should treat the film ...
> Isopropanol would be too risky to try. : P
You need to ask how the handle.
>> So earlier it was quite expensive, since there were only a few, the special
>> Scanner had the individual record. If you have such a
>> Service still find it is obviously the best. (Berola
>> Seems to do that?)
>>
>> Meanwhile, the film only from the most (with various tricks to
>> Improvement), as there is Qalität provider of highly secure
>> Fluctuate ...
>>
>> Is the question what it is worth to you ...
>
> The euro one way or another in any case. I think the ninth
> with the HD-scanning advertises itself with the trust that its HD-Cam only
> abzufilmen?
Certainly I would not.
> Since then I paid what synonymous prefer it. I would be synonymous
> in 2k or 4k scanning leave if practicable and would not
> infinitely expensive ... werweiß if not in 10 years the state of the art
> is. : P
Ideally, as I said something that every picture individually recognized
my synonymous photographed and the dust-free ...
--
Photography and Still Image - Art from Brunswick
photography - art - sketches: http://gerrit.brodmann.com
Sexy does LARP - Medieval and Fantasy: http://derLARPfotograf.de
One Minute / Random photoArt: http://one-minute.info
Antwort von Dennis Reinhardt:
Gerrit Brodmann wrote:
>> Yes, ne Luxeon LED with Difusor with his wire over the construct the film
>> Hanged while the bottom of the scanner was s.Scannen. :)
>
> Oh woe 8-)
Was just the only grade what was handy. And better than a
Desk lamp, it was synonymous. : P
> The synonymous. Because he has the light of the lower synonymous still continuing. Scanner,
> The scanning is capable of shooting, turn the Auflichtlampe
> In the sleds out and use only the transmitted light for the Filmscan.
Also, not really optimal, my design.
> With the scanner is as similar as with the watt figures at Conrad
> Compact systems. Since the theoretical maximum value of all individual
> Components of a millisecond before Verglühen together and
> As marked on the package written 8-)
When I buy Conrad synonymous nix, so not for nothing called the blue pharmacy ...
> Would be ideal as I have said something that every picture individually recognized
> My synonymous photographed and the dust-free ...
Eben, with his ordinary industrial film scanner. If someone
something to offer, I expect the synonymous use sowas. : P
Well, I'll see. :)
Gruß, Dennis
Antwort von Bernd Nomi:
Dennis Reinhardt wrote:
>
> When I buy Conrad synonymous nix, so not for nothing called the blue pharmacy ...
Slowly with the prejudices. Conrad is far more expensive, you
always be synonymous to the quality of the eighth and then compare prices.
Buy the best times for example 6.3 mm jacks for Reichelt and the
mittelpreisigen at Conrad. I had made the mistake and then
a lot of work within a few days of operation during a push-box
more than 40 of 100 jacks again and replace the need to expand because the
"Good" of the last Reichelt China are scrap.
>> Ideally, as I said something that every picture individually recognized
>> My synonymous photographed and the dust-free ...
>
> Exactly, with film industry nem ordinary scanner. If someone
> Something to offer, I expect the synonymous use sowas. : P
If the quantity of films is limited, mainly only really
rewarding raussucht recordings, it is worth of the digitizer
qualified professionals do it. For a larger order, I would
recommend a work sample and to demand a withdrawal guarantee
if the work was faulty.
