Frage von mbenner:
Hi,
I logged in additional to this forum on this issue at length to bring light into darkness. Although I have I asked amateur movie forum, I got nowhere.
The question is, as already suggests:
What are the differences, advantages and disadvantages of the Sony HDR fx1000 of comparison with a Canon EOS 7D?
So what are the specific differences that would justify this price difference. Recently I learned that even having the fx1000 the "rolling shutter" problem.
Perhaps you could give me some advice synonymous equal to it. I need the camera for short films of all genres that I produce.
Greetings
mbenner
Antwort von Axel:
Normal video camcorder braves make the viewers feel the time is very unsexy. The main reason is its almost absolute depth of field. This may be a zeitgeist-wisp, but my personal view is to the FX 1k totally overpriced for that, they can do what, or can
not: no progressive mode, no XLR inputs, and only one million pixels auf'm chip (HDV is 1.5, Full HD would be 2).
I USDI 7D and they would even would get if I Sonyfür 1000 ¬, continue (prefer still missing criterion: The lowlight, though in Slashcam camcorder test for Sony With "Very Good" indicated, can never with the 7D and the likes , would compete in the Comparison is probably "Sufficient"), but nevertheless:
Your poll is missing the "not yet", or as a third possibility Panasonic GH2 ...
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... Advantages and disadvantages of the Sony HDR fx1000 of comparison with a Canon EOS 7D? ... I need the camera for short films of all genres ... With "short films" I associate scenic, repeatable Rotate after script, short takes, no need for an auto-focus, recording on a separate recorder. Then you are with a camera like the 7D misappropriated or GH2 - plus some accessories - be better served. Not to mention of course the already mentioned of Axel fashion trend of the minimal depth of field.
In contrast, could - with no claim to completeness - the benefits of the FX1000: longer recording s.Stück, no danger of overheating, a versatile zoom lens (a comparable focal length and is light region at a DSLR is not possible, synonymous smooth zooms are there more a matter of luck) , quick-reacting autofocus, Shot Transition function, swiveling display, viewfinder and what is interesting in these times of ever cheaper becoming external recorder: a fully usable HDMI output, with the one as s.der-camera HDV Compression by directly in ProRes or can absorb another powerful format.
... ... No FX 1k progressive mode ... A 25p mode, the FX1000 well, but she draws from the material on tape for compatibility as 50i. Via HDMI but my knowledge is true 25p output.
Antwort von Axel:
... ... No FX 1k progressive mode ...
A 25p mode, the FX1000 well, but she draws from the material on tape for compatibility as 50i. Via HDMI but my knowledge is true 25p output. This reduces my negative opinion is a bit (by the way have been misappropriated in the SC-CC test then, is as one would mention a car although the fuel consumption test, but not the all-wheel drive ...). Depth of field you will soon find it very cool (cell phone movie without shallow DoF
here ), but interlace is indisputable and will always remain synonymous it. Nevertheless, you get less money for much more s.Leistung.
Antwort von Crookie:
The main difference is that the 7D is a camera, while the Sony is a video camera.
Most are making the s.Handling noticeable.
If you want to work properly with the 7D, you'll need anyway still some s.zubehör.
Focus you get out the way synonymous with the FX1000. Not as much as with a DSLR, but still sufficient.
In my opinion, you just shoot with a DSLR, if you know exactly what you do.
You seem to know this is not, however, so I recommend the FX1000.
Antwort von Mink:
alone to cover the focal range of the FX1000 in the 7D you need a lot of money for Lenses.
Antwort von mbenner:
Thanks for the help. Finally I got gescheide answers.
