Frage von Roland Bergadler:
Hello, I have sadly little idea of the expensive models.
Previously, I had a small SonyminiDV but now I would like to ascend.
The advice in the media market fails, the seller is completely incompetent and synonymous in our local Still Image & Video shop owner I was able to data-only product from this booklet.
Perhaps you can advise me better yes. I would s.der Camera professional features such as Henkel, multiple outputs, Firewire, shoulder option would be synonymous loved me and if it is synonymous macro capability.
Can you match models:)?
Antwort von Mora57:
http://www.camcorder-test.com/
Antwort von Bernd E.:
404ERR
Antwort von Mora57:
Or more precisely:
Antwort von Markus:
The class is up to 3000 euros in HDV shoulder area free ;-) The entire area is HDV strapless. What JVC and Canon offer because, they're not shoulder cameras, but at best schultergestütze (top) camcorder. ;-)
Antwort von wolodja:
SonyHDR-FX1
SonyHVR-A1
SonyHVR-V1
SonyHDR-FX7
Canon XH A1
My feeling fluctuates between XH A1 and the SonyFX1. For Sony Steige but I did not through the product range. The cameras seem to me almost all the same. What are the major differences between the SonyCamcordern?
The JVC GY-HD100 would be my dream. With interchangeable lens:)
Unfortunately something terrible expensive video the little miracle.
Antwort von wolodja:
SonyHDR-FX1
... the little miracle video. Well, really intoxicating, the images are not the Camera. Especially since the 100 model indeed is the first and still has all the childhood diseases.
Then even the camera only takes 25p and so sometimes looks very choppy.
But what the differences of the Sony's are:
www.camcorder-test.com
But as you look at the Page yes partou not look like (it is clear from your question) I will list on.
FX1: 3x 1/3zoll CCD chips, no XLR inputs, decent image quality (Attention subjective lenses facts based on opinion), but because of their age no longer Bildqualli best. The FX1 is the consumer version of the Z1.
HVR-A1: 1x 1 / 2, 7 inch CMOS Chip, XLR inputs, good picture quality, has more the size of a classic consumer camera. Is the prosumer version of the HC1
FX7: The golden mean between A1 and FX1. 3x 1 / 4 CMOS chips, no XLR inputs. Top quality. Super Slowmotion function (rather gimmick because the Bildqualli in this case is lousy). Size between A1 and FX1. "Consumer" variant V1.
V1: 3x 1 / 4 inch CMOS chips, XLR inputs, features 1080p on Super Slowmotion function. Top Bildqualli, at the moment (pre-) occur when recording in progressive mode to ghosting effects.
I hope it helps you a little bit next.
Antwort von Roland Bergadler:
Thank you for your good answer, very next to me has helped. The Page I übrigends been viewed, I only have little clue to the Digitalcamcordern and I do not know quite what it really matters at all technical details.
XLR should be given. Since I have at first glance it did not care.
Now my feeling that fluctuates and forth between the Canon XH A1 and the SonyHVR-V1. Which would you choose and why?
I'm still annoyed that the models with interchangeable lens recording so outrageously expensive. What does one do except to wait;)
Antwort von Markus:
I'm still annoyed that the models with interchangeable lens recording so outrageously expensive. What does one do except to wait;) A good Exchangable optics cost several thousand euros. Since the camcorder so concerned with such a (relatively cheap when synonymous) Optics shipped, which is reflected in the price of course synonymous again.
Antwort von Jan:
Good to V 1 is hardly likely to get about 3000 ¬, the "down" FX 7 is on the Internet about it at 3000 ¬ with shipping.
Just the model I would synonymous with 3000 ¬ purchase current camera take, I will use the next few weeks it often synonymous with spin.
If the Tonfraktion (XLR inputs) and the various time codes or the fine picture manual setups are required then SonyHVR A 1
If you do not take a snooze at the light turn FX 7, the perfect camera in the price category, which is now even a well-known Canon 20x optical zoom and has an HDMI output. The old FX 1 or competitor FX 7 - Canon XH A 1 are the best cameras in the 3000-3500 ¬ HDV class.
If you Canon XH 1 (the incredible Lowlight with the Picture and the seemingly extraordinary manual options, including XLR) or SonyHDR FX 7 (Simply a great Automatikcam - in almost every situation is a perfect setting - but with a not as of Sony light slumber friend) could you the current edition of the active Digital video (now I have to get money but slow ....) reizen, the two are in a direct comparison in the issue has been intensively gestetet - And the Winner is ... Who you know - but it was scarce.
VG
Jan
Antwort von wolodja:
I stood facing the same decision. Do the test in the video and read Active synonymous I have decided. I will buy the XH A1. Is simply the better camera for my purposes.
Antwort von Jan:
Yes, the XH A1 you can use / want, my previous Canon film knowledge (XM 2 / XL 1) show the synonymous - car does not go as Canon Law, the XLRs are of course a point Pros FX 1 / 7 do not have.
The Sony but synonymous in the automatic transmission is very strong, the one or the other filmmakers certainly synonymous opposite - hence 2 Super cameras.
VG
Jan
Antwort von beiti:
The JVC GY-HD100 would be my dream. With interchangeable lens:)
Unfortunately something terrible expensive video the little miracle. Is halt with the 720p Picture a very different world than the 1080i types of Sonyand Canon. 720p is currently the first choice when indie movies or cinema advertising wants (ie s.Ende must FAZen). For general purposes, I would but because of the 1080i resolution better movement prefer.
Antwort von Roland Bergadler:
Thanks for your positive contributions:)
The magazines, I will, willy-nilly have to buy. Hopefully I get the synonymous here somewhere.
Is the auto the Canon really so modest?
Which camcorder in this conversation actually offer sharpness areas 5cm and an image Stabilization?
The FX7 optical somehow tells me not to. Shame to the good automatic.
Greeting
Roland
Antwort von Roland Bergadler:
ps. What did Cam won? Canon:-D
Antwort von Jan:
In the new "video" is synonymous to a test in it, there was little Lowlightschwäche the FX 7 But almost never mentioned.
The test pictures of VAD say that but what else:
FX 1 FX 7
Antwort von Roland Bergadler:
Class post! Thank you! A pity the pictures in the test side by side VAD is not true:)
Is it for me as a beginner in the semi-segment really useful with the Sonyanzufangen or can I as a beginner synonymous with good pictures of the Canon hinbekommen?
The manual options for the Canon I would have been happy that when I one day better so familiar.
But I do not want the next 10 hours of film that I produce are only botch.
Hope you understand what I mean. Will you not so bloody annoying, but newbies like me are feast for every seller, acquaintances are familiar with the topic are so alien to me, I just ask you that I can and I think it makes very good ;-) synonymous
Greeting s.alle
Roland
Antwort von Jan:
Good, I must admit that at least the HDV Lowlightbild not so incredibly worse than the old FX 1st VAD has but a Lowlightbild of the VX 2000 in the next test, which is very clear.
Les you through the test, ¬ 7.50, it's easy to spend, especially if to 3000-3500 is ¬.
It is no wonder magazine, but you come a little closer s.deine Camera - the s.Besten adapts to you.
VG
Jan
Antwort von r.p. television:
Times about why, despite the many advantages of the Sony against Canon Canon won, although the Canon a lot more to offer.
Just the number of dedicated Sony ads in the last video Aktivs count. Then the Canon ads.
It germinates but the suspicion that this is not quite objectively judged is .....
Antwort von beiti:
This "advertiser-influenced test" Legend I do not think so. That would be too obvious.
The fact is that the VAD Readings in automatic position identified as cuts and the Canon does not hold so well. In essence, VAD is still an amateur magazines, if occasionally synonymous professional equipment will be presented.
That more than 90% of the camcorder owners never leave virtually automatic, is known. Hence, the evaluation of VAD a certain logic. Filmmakers who know better, can the relevant details from the reports pick and hopefully will not buy total points.
I already own with some Canon and Sony worked (if not synonymous with the tested here) and can certainly confirm the trend that Sonydie better automatic builds. I myself have sinned in Comparison then ever because of certain details of the Canon decided that inexperienced friend, but rather on Sony devices.
My uncle has, for example, a 5-year-old Sony, their automatic White Balance in all types of light provide good photos. My uncle still has no idea what White Balance actually is, and thanks to the Sony-automatic which he must not necessarily synonymous. If he had one of my two Canon made, he would under a strong incandescent orange color and energy saving light bulbs under a greenish tint to produce, and I had already spent hours trying to address how to deal with manual white balance to teach. So it behaves similarly synonymous with the automatic exposure (especially against the detection and correction) and a few other things. Just another example: My MVX3i Canon is an excellent camcorder with many interesting features, but automatic does a few idiotic things (eg cars in low light at 1 / 25 seconds off), you know as a filmmaker and manual must avoid. VAD has a smooth MVX3i was "poor" for the missed Lowlight skills, and average in the direction of filmmakers who is correct. I myself movies in low light with 1 / 50 second and bright, if the picture during the follow-on. The result is certainly no worse than other camcorders in this price class. But synonymous clear that VAD is not something in the test can be introduced.
It is certainly not true that generally all automatic toll Sony and Canon all-automatics are useless, but a tendency in this direction, there is in any case. Since VAD is certainly not synonymous this wrong.
Antwort von Jan:
No it is not clear, VAD has even shown that it specifically for the experienced hand with the XH A 1 which are better pictures reach.
It was holding out the automatic Sonywith its a very high level s.Bildqualität achieved without too much adjusting.
I've synonymous with a time of 2 XM filmed, so you get used to Canon s.die small weaknesses and tried this necessary. The White Balance Incandescent light is not exactly sure when Canon, which runs until DigiCam camp, while Ixus & DSLR forum can be a lot in the direction of reading. The AF for less light synonymous not hesitate to recommend it, is synonymous Digi Videocam + Canon problem.
Or overexposed faces for dark substance at a stage concert & theater while you can with the known function Spotlight improve strangely only comes with Sony not such problems.
With the FX 7 a VX 2100 film simply better things, because it's basically 2100 is not HDV. Known keys are now where we used in the VX 2100 had already (Weissabgeich, gain, shutter ..)
Also, the LCD viewfinders simultaneously and can be taken now, a highlight that I s.der DSR PD 170 had already appreciate, the FX has 7 surprisingly synonymous.
A Focus function M / A and M zb at the Nikon 18-70 ED Lens has (Canon optics synonymous with the middle class), is at 7 with FX s.Bord, so we via Focus ring despite activated AF still a little fast correction can do without leaving the AF.
The man the microphone input in menu is not as synonymous as VX 2100 Line In signal switches can be annoying, especially for "concert film" like me, are not always from the mixer to the microphone level can get to the sound directly to MiniDV tape to record .
The FX 7 has some features of the professional model of the FX 1 - Z 1 only in him, why now despite 20-fold zoom only one of almost 5 mm Wide Anglerausgekommen is worse than the FX 1 is regrettable. The FX Light 7 is not a model of the FX 1 - up to 1-3 strengths rather equivalent (manual tone now on the menu, WW worse, heavier implement with low depth of more than just zoom offset to FX 1, just as no S-Video / AV In) In many other score, the new FX 7 But the old FX 1st
As interested as I said the FX 7 can you first experience reports and tests on video & VAD closer look at the direct comparison has VAD s.Bord, synonymous with quality test images DV FX 7 - A 1 & XH VX 2000th
This is an experienced filmmaker like you Beiti the reports do not need, I can understand synonymous.
In time constraints can be a professional but even the good Sony automatics what, where focusing on the essential things can concentrate to 1 / 50 sec, the White Balance Tungsten, depending on the desired aperture and the manual AF synonymous times drinlassen at a similar concert rotation, and auto AF only artificial WAG is a Canon never go, because even at the smallest of requirements problems forfeit, which is then quickly captured by the cameraman to be trained must.
And I say this as a Panasonic actually very friendly - if not the honesty is ...
VG
Jan
Antwort von Roland Bergadler:
There would then probably Sonydie but the better choice. I like the FX7 optical unfortunately it did not. And yes, the FX1 is the first generation HDV still have some teething problems.
Looks again after a compromise. And although I have so much on the XHA1 geschielt had. Or you can without manual settings synonymous with the Canon make good pictures?
The quote of Jan "AF auto and WAG only artificial light is never at a Canon, because even at the smallest of requirements problems forfeit, which is then quickly captured by experienced cameraman to be." Klang ja doch irgendwie ;-)
Whether you are 2% worse than the Sony automatic transmission is now not so tragic. I would like to halt the professional features of Canon for the future
Greetings and thanks for your great help
Roland
Antwort von Jan:
No so bad is not the synonymous Canon, a Canon just wants to be served, especially in difficult situations.
Take a snooze times light, the AF is pumping in principle, always, blue & red light brings them right into problems when exposed to harsher contrasts ask about - what Spotlight is to improve, the automatic white balance is not safe, at least in artificial -- of exactly how Beiti confirmed. That is certainly my experience with Consumer & XM 2 and XL 1st Whether XH A 1 or XL H 1 can be clearly better, I can not say. Now look at the "Remove the cassette" Quelereien (XM 2) & head drum sounds excessive times ignore the Canons have. Always the same problems the Canon still does not get to grips has.
I know of several 1 & XL XM 2 film was never again a Canon in the hand are due to grossly disappointed. The film now with Panasonic DVX 100 & SonyVX 2100 or PD 170 and would never change. This is true at least for the class is not HDV.
One Canon Camera unlike the other 3 companies only 1 year warranty, is not the synonymous stylish, yes Canon behaves quite accommodating if after a year of a clearly indebted Canon error occurs.
I think there are more than 2% but not synonymous to 10-20% may be lost.
Les halt the tests, and the opinions of the users with the XH A 1 have already worked and are relatively unbiased. That the XH A 1 Existing everything in the same price class loose with the manual controls in the bottom rams is the truth, but not a halt where the cameraman is automatic and still love Challenging ...
Same test ...
PS: I am not very much of the Canon cameras do, so you can rauslesen ...
VG
Jan
Antwort von wolfgang:
In time constraints can be a professional but even the good Sony automatics what, where focusing on the essential things can concentrate to 1 / 50 sec, the White Balance Tungsten, depending on the desired aperture and the manual AF synonymous times drinlassen at a similar concert rotation, and auto AF only artificial WAG is a Canon never go, because even at the smallest of requirements problems forfeit, which is then quickly captured by the cameraman to be trained must.
So this is for me an essential point - namely, turning in what situation will I use the device? I have about the FX1 with two quite different situations, and work with the device, therefore, synonymous different. Am I in a documentary about situation - the Rotate a wedding, a first em Rotate: ie, in a situation where I have little time, then I set the unit to 1 / 50 and driving with a fixed white balance. Possible is a profile that shows a little skin-friendly - but in Aperture and focus, I work mostly with the automatic.
Quite different in nature or landscape documentation, where you have much time to adjust and has to play. There can be only so many controls and properly savor ausreizen.
So already synonymous depends heavily on how you want to use the device.
Incidentally, I would not hastily dismiss FX7. The has (unfortunately) no XLR inputs, but in picture comparisons she amazingly strong and get well.
Antwort von Jan:
Filme Yes I almost always only the category of light slumber, and often synonymous with the time pressure.
Wolfgang with his experience has probably right, the landscape for the shooting XH A 1, a camera is very interesting. Since I can with the XH A 1 is the Picture in Detail durchplanen the time is most probably because there.
No matter what you told in pictures and whose Lowlight conditions is simply better than Sony, Canon, no preference whether VX 2100, PD 170, FX 1, or the new 7 - this is just in the electronics (blood) because the camera to shine.
Good synonymous an automatic picture of the XH A 1 is certainly not bad.
In the next few weeks, I angelesenen my only experience with the FX 7, then try me practically synonymous.
Let's see ...
VG
Jan
Antwort von Roland Bergadler:
Since you're probably right. At best it would be for me if I Sonyand Canon times a day and had to just so that filming could.
This is probably wishful thinking but my stay. With luck I might find a shop that has both cameras Stock ;-)
But thanks to you I now very much in advance essential.
That has made the decision not easily made, but more information is always good.
Lieber Gruß
Roland
Antwort von Erich:
Hello!
I film with the camcorder SonyPC100 and VX2100. Also my TV is of Sony.
With all devices, I am very satisfied.
I find it unfortunate that video actively overexposed automatic image evaluation assistants.
Camcorders buy this price class people, who attach importance to quality.
The typical film would have the correct exposure. Why does the camera feature a zebra?
The test image of the FX7 is the size of 1440 x 1080, which the XH-A1 1920 x 1080th
This allows no direct comparison of the sharpness impression. The Picture of the FX7 is crispy as it actually is.
For sharpening assessment can be refined as the foothills of the arid "branch" (right next to the sheep) herabhängt. The A1 is the gut before the magenta-colored background to detect - at the FX7 is just soft, blurred.
To Color. The colors of the A1 are purer than the FX7. You see the yellow flowers in the foreground to the right of the sheep. The FX7 is very much mixed with green. That is even with the example images in the book to see.
In the pink tulip on the sheep, the FX7 bruises to see. ******** Here I am wrong. Blue stains are available - but with two cameras. In the bloom is probably synonymous blue included. Because of the differing exposure fall when FX7 more. ******** Very long left at the yellow flowers (flowers hazelnut?) Is in the FX7 Farbmoiré to recognize.
With these limitations, this comparison test no help for a purchase decision.
Greetings!
Erich
Antwort von Jan:
Les halt the tests, and the opinions of the users with the XH A 1 have already worked and are relatively unbiased. That the XH A 1 Existing everything in the same price class loose with the manual controls in the bottom rams is the truth, but not a halt where the cameraman is automatic and still love Challenging ...
Same test ...
VG
Jan That I had but written as a reference point. Nevertheless, I find the tests of no preference whether Andi Wunderlich - semptember-film.de (video) or VAD is not so bad, they should hold a first indication for a possible purchase serve. And I can be any device permanently rumnörgeln, one finds all the devices in a weakness.
This can be especially good at making lenses, s.Ende makes it all totally interested in the Camera verückt then never buys.
Each Lens Digital Camera s.einer the truth is, through his non-telecentric design (CCD & CMOS sensors can do is perpendicular received correctly handle light, side light is not perceived, so that not every pixel on the chip is sufficiently well lit) always any loss in image quality, the internal camera software can vary depending on the strength nor the one or the other "hush." Grade for small sensors, such as 1 / 6 "or 1 / 3" is the more important.
Vignetting and distortion, each Lens, depending on the number of lenses, their kind of compensation or the quality of the concave (lens light scattering) and convex (light-collecting lens) lenses, a little more or less. When the camera somewhere at a reasonable level is, I'll give these things in the models not because we ensure that every buyer of purchase capacity.
Yes, in many Internet forums will be down to the smallest with the technical terms rumgehauen, and partly a fairly good camera completely rotten made by tens of times ranzoomt, with the magnifying glass feature wildly off all edges, the smallest color checks - but usually not with the real demands of the majority of the buyers.
That is not an attack against you Erich, well you stop watching after the image of the kind mentioned to me - at a very high level, each as he pleases.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Shiwa:
Hi Jan!
".... ...." Checked smallest color
So small the differences are not. Even if you would be negligible,
then you can very well take note of - especially if
the two models so close. Then you can
still decide whether this point is relevant.
".... - But usually not with the real demands of the majority of
Buyers ....."
This is maybe 400 ¬ for the class - but not at 4000 ¬.
In addition.
I am open to both Manufacturer. I was so far tend to Sony camp.
What surprised me is that a camcorder at the Laboratory in all score, except for the noise behavior, the front is the worst camcorder should be. Moreover, in the text s.verschiedenen Make bluntly said, the XH-A1 is actually the better camera (so I read from the text). That made me skeptical and was the occasion for me, closer look.
I have now done. That should be enough now but have been synonymous.
Greetings!
Erich
Antwort von Erich:
Hello!
The Beitag top of me. Was probably too slow. Bin collection in the text flew out.
Erich
Antwort von Jan:
Yes maybe. But Sony VAD-Won mention as another guest?
Yes in video & Sony VAD many ads. But who has won VAD?
Lower Class: Panasonic GS 27
Next class: JVC GR D 650
Next class: Panasonic GS 280
Next class: Canon MVX 4i & Panasonic GS 500
Next class: Panasonic DVD VDR 150
I think Sony's the single most recently as a test winner was FX were 1 / 7 or zb DVD 405 / 505. Sony wins as often as not there.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Roland Bergadler:
The whole issue is a matter of faith to pieces. I am still inconclusive as before. But have learned a lot so thank you again for your high quality contributions some :-)
Does anyone know a shop in the area of Frankfurt Stock camcorder is better?
The shitty media market has a number of dealers on the conscience and a very limited choice which camcorder is concerned. Main stereos for more than 15ooo Euro offer ....
Antwort von Jan:
What can I say?
I come myself from a shop in Dresden, of the big chains has been flattened. I now work as synonymous of some other earlier stop at Saturn & Media. It is not always easy.
Yes times 10 degrees, the Saturn FX 7, 12, XH 1st One Frankfurt Bornheim the XH 1 - know how much the seller can not say I give you. Frankfurt should actually be Markus area - what shops are good?
But let's face it you need no technology freak seller - only one of you security - the right to have bought. You see, even here in the forum Hersche between models fundamental disagreements, both synonymous with the model have been filmed.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Markus:
Frankfurt should actually be Markus area - what shops are good? If I become a Media Markt or Saturn go, I know very well what I want. Other parts I refer to as Teltec * in Wiesbaden.
Edit + + + +
* Teltec can get to today's knowledge is no longer recommended. Anyone who wishes further details / needs, please contact via email. Anything else would be beyond the scope here.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Or MBF film technology in Frankfurt.
Antwort von DWUA:
In search of the (almost forgotten), we have SonyPD 170
Found a deal, just the next to be recommended.
The 90 n.Fahrt (easy), we have, after several phone calls
and e-mails like to purchase used.
We were advised (mind.1 hour, since no customers run)
of professionals, the synonymous TV Studios (regional channel) equip
Sony cams can repair, Panasonic and JVC on sale.
We can therefore, be extremely satisfied customers, just next VST recommend:
The picture that we could make on the spot revealed that it is a modern, competent, friendly and absolutely reliable source.
So what gabs we have never before in this style and therefore synonymous our selfless advertising for you, you're s.Suchen.
The www.vst-course synonymous pro.de sent ....
If this kind of recommendation is undesirable in this forum
then deletes the entry, or simply ignored him.
Antwort von Roland Bergadler:
Super, ever since I have a few points of contact. Thank you :-) s.die Suppliers
I'm glad this time equal to the right forum to have found. Find it so great here, praise s.alle!
Antwort von Jan:
Roland Schön, you let the Canon is not just excuses, no preference who says what, I'm in the friend-Prosumermarkt Sony geb ich zu.
I did the last few weeks with lots of FX 7 synonymous often filmed in DV mode (because for web synonymous in DV last), I can almost only praise.
I know the discus ions with the FX 1 with a few pixels and supposedly faded picture I can not confirm, had ne time synonymous Überflieger PD 170 to the Tripod.
Yes ok, the light sensitivity of FX 7 is already worse than ne track VX 2100 / PD 170, I think you can but in extreme light snooze times already synonymous with 9 dB gain and reinforce higher without the extremely Picture collapses. The few smear effects thanks to the CMOS chips, can I really commendable.
Expanded Focus (1.5 x magnification s.Viewfinder short for better manual focus), you can really use, even on different keys set - I had put it on photo, because almost every film, the photo button synonymous with darkness finds. Well the color of the FX 7 is not so great, the SW the PD 170 has given me better.
Peaking can be as professional Z 1 in several colors, not only white but yellow or red to make a good help.
Depending on the situation, the 20x optical zoom to be attractive. Also, the 6 freely assignable Assign buttons are good, it can eg Focus infinite, markers, Spotlight equal emphasis, which makes things faster.
Even the truly free choice of the shutter, the aperture and the gain were beautiful, just like the Hold function to their own values to be maintained longer.
Why only the speed of the zoom on the small "handle" zoom can cover, the greater zoom when cassette compartment unbelegbar are like this but I find it a shame, well with a lot of feeling is always better s.Zoomring forward spin.
The built-Cinema program (Program Picture 2) but it costs a little light, but interesting.
The Tonaussteuerung I must now criticize easily, first in the menu only to find only two levels simultaneously Changeable. Yes you can check status by (a button) to quickly see how the level behaves
but need to change several key about 6! pressed to control themselves.
What concerns me even more angry is that is no Line In input is there, only the micro input. When approved by playing sound mixer (yes Lippensyncrone halt the rapid variation of the sound recording) must be very careful with it with the console auspegeln together, the sound level was several neatly in the Open field has been synonymous barely moved and the sound did not fit - strong distortions, only Headphones on some rauszuhören. If no exact check not easily find out. That I knew of Consumer Pana GS 500 better, even ausgepegelt fit the sound, except the mixer level vollkommmen was wrong.
And No - XLR, I can say I have a XLR adapter 2x Fe-male to 3.5 stereo jack used - not the cheap home-made, but only 7 ¬ expensive Y adapter 0.9 WFF CFY of Cordial Sound & Audio Equipment from Dachau, yes well the synonymous comes from China, but is well made and so little money for a "gift". Then you can while the unbalanced connection over long distances but still reasonably fit.
But as I do not fall with a 1x XLR to two RCA (red & white) purely because 1 XLR connector is mono, stereo and there is output, gibts ne phase of extinction, and the built-Micro Sonyspringt the car again.
VG
Jan
