Frage von inwa:
Normally, HDTV has 1080 one Resolutionvon approximately 2.07 Megapixel (1920 x 1080 pixels). For the commonly specified Resolutionvon HDV 1440 x 1080 pixels would need a camera) of 1.55 megapixels (per chip. In the 1080s, the horizontal mode Resolutionvon HDV compared to the normal HDTV format is thus reduced by 25%.
Sony's flagship HDV camera HVR-Z1E has only 1.07 megapixels, which corresponds to a Resolutionvon 990 x 1080 pixels. HDTV 1080 compared to the Resolutionalso is reduced by almost 50% synonymous, and in the small HD 720 mode is reduced Resolutionum about 23%, since only satisfied with 990 x 720 pixels can be used with 1280 x 720 pixels.
Antwort von inwa:
The Resolutionvon HDCam should be reduced. What someone knows about it?
Antwort von camworks:
indeed, such times after the keyword "pixel shift". which increases the resolution and virtually any camera (at least in the consumer sector) is working with this technology.
Antwort von Niklas:
HDCAM reduces the resolution!
1080 60i:
1440 x 1080, with a Farbsampling of 3:1:1 8bit
Data rate 140Mbps
DVCPROHD there is hardly any better:
The Resolutionliegt there at 1280 x 1080, at least 4:2:2 8bit
Data rate 100Mbps
And of course, is more expensive HDCAM SR:
There are (I think) the full 4:4:4 RGB Resolutionund one Farbsampling.
Antwort von Marco:
Yes, HDCam CineAlta SR-products such as the drawing 1920x1080 pixels at either 4:2:2, or 4:4:4 Farbsampling synonymous with a data rate of 440 Mbit / sec (if only for the video signal) as MPEG-4 with 10 bit on .
Yes synonymous cost accordingly ...
Marco
Antwort von MiXMaster:
indeed, such times after the keyword "pixel shift". which increases the resolution and virtually any camera (at least in the consumer sector) is working with this technology. In the "pixel shift" in principle, be made 3 recordings and interpolated. It is synonymous with only 1 chip cameras and video cameras with hardly the need to have 50 frames per second:
"JVC has also dug deep into the bag of tricks to increase the already considerable Resolutionvon 3.34 megapixels in its GC-X1 Digital Camera again. Two shifted by one pixel images that are made in a split second, can the two pictures with different filter colors are included - the information in the green area can be collected 100 percent in the red and blue color need to be interpolated, only 50 percent. The "pixel-shift" technology is referred to only one of three settings based on double exposures, the JVC to improve the image quality s.seiner new digital camera offers. "
http://www.digitalkamera.de/Info/News/03/13-de.htm
PAL can be compressed in the way of Austrahlung synonymous almost 50% to 440 lines.
Antwort von inwa:
Correction: It says: "Pixel Shift" is one of three double exposures based setting option. If this is true need to be made 6 frames and interpolated to generate a picture. 25 times 6 makes 150 frames, which would process a Vidoekamera second. That seems to me something much more abundant, not to mention the fact that the Belichtungsezeit should synonymous corresponding to shrink.
Antwort von inwa:
HDCAM reduces the resolution!
1080 60i:
1440 x 1080, with a Farbsampling of 3:1:1 8bit
Data rate of 140Mbps. Where did you get that? Give it a link? Why the HDCAM then 2.2 million pixels where many would still have 1.55 milion. Perhaps so they can LIVE the full Resolutionbringen.
DVCPROHD there is hardly any better:
The Resolutionliegt there at 1280 x 1080, at least 4:2:2 8bit
Data rate 100Mbps Why DVCPROHD with 4x provides higher data rate is even less Resolutionals HDV (1440 x 1080). To say nothing of the full resolution (1920 x 1080). The should be in MPEG 2 format, even with 50Mps (DVC PRO easily equal 50) for?
And of course, is more expensive HDCAM SR:
There are (I think) the full 4:4:4 RGB Resolutionund one Farbsampling. How to create that? Other Kompermierung?
Antwort von Marco:
"How to create that? Other Kompermierung?" Have I not described gerademal three posts obendrüber: 440 Mbit / sec but for the video signal in MPEG-4 compression.
Marco
Antwort von inwa:
Thanks, the thread had flown too fast. HDCAM creates 140Mbps. If HDCAM SR 440 Mbit / sec does the same as Mbps and Mbps, then so must the tape run more than 3 times as fast through the recorder.
Antwort von Marco:
Tape on an even higher data rate ends up, for the 440 Mbit / sec, so apply only to the video, audio, there is added again. Total (including audio) is about 600 Mbit / sec.
"So then the tape must be run more than 3 times as fast through the recorder." Can not say that. This indeed depends of different things. HDCam SR tapes than other uses such as HDCam. Which allow a higher data density.
Marco
Antwort von wolfgang:
Yes synonymous cost accordingly ...
Marco I think you have all missed time this small but crucial indication of Marco ...
Those who can afford the equipment listed here, let me invite you once ask for a coffee ... I am simply not rich enough for this world!
;)
Antwort von Niklas:
HDV uses an Interframe Compression:
Images are placed in groups (GOP: Group of Pictures).
The first frame (I-frame) enrhält the full image information, so the full resolution.
In subsequent frames (B and P frames) are only the changes to the I-frame was added. They have, therefore, only a greatly reduced resolution.
No problem, until a movement comes into play. Then, of course, as many pixels as amended, that the fixed data rate of 25 Mbps is not enough.
The camcorder is reacting to that, he Resolutionreduziert, and it produces Artekakte that are masked by blurring.
HDV has also (ideally just standing with no motion picture) the full resolution.
DVDPROHD contrast compresses each frame individually (intraframe) compression.
With the same codec as synonymous already DV: One further development of the Motion-JPEG codecs.
Thus, each picture full resolution.
Incidentally, it is a difference between what the chips and start what will ultimately end up after the compression on the tape. Everybody does it differently Manufacturer.
Antwort von inwa:
Yes, but you can not score from less to more effective.
Sharpness Comparison Sony HDV 1:07 mega pixels (left) versus 1.56 million mega pixel Canon HDV (right)
Quote: "For each of the horizontal beams, the sharp-pointed SonyZ1 a disadvantage compared to Canon's new flagship."
of:
http://www.slashcam.de/artikel/Test/Die-Sony-HVR-Z1-im-Test.html[/quote]
It is clear, since the horizontal Resolutionum 50% gegüber HDTV 1080 is reduced. The Canon has a reduction of only 25% of what is right tollerabel. DVC PRO HD is to be reduced by 33% and can provide full Resolutionnicht afzeichnen on tape.
Even the professional system HDCAM is horizontally compressed by 25%. Although the cameras full Resolutionhaben.
What surprised me is that the one-chip of Sonywith), about 3 million pixels (color dots Resolutionschafft less than the 3 chip with 1 million pixels) (pixels. With a sensor Beyer would have been in the single-chip roughly 2 million pixels can be real (dots) to achieve some of which could then HDV can record 1.56 million.
Antwort von deepcode:
Pixel Shift: IMO there is a slight misalignment of the expense green - an additional canal brightness information (the color resolution produces).
HDV: Of course, behind it is essentially just a hype. If one of progressive images from it will be seen that no current HDV - Camera - apart of the Canon - dissolves much higher than a good 16:9 SD camera like the XL2.
Because:
- 1 / sensors are 3 faint and generate a higher pixel count with increasing noise, which makes the extracted Resolutionzunichte and destroyed the low light performance
- Low Price optics are not able to produce such a high resolution of detail on the tiny area of a 1 / 3 sensors to
- It's for Noise and Lens - losses is still left is pressed through a 25 Mbit / s mpeg2 bottleneck.
Seen a miracle that the cameras provide any sort of rational images!
Antwort von Niklas:
Thanks Deepcode!
I think the lab HDV is ne really great thing
But if man mal nen pivot about the test makes pictures, one is already Shen, defendant states will be there to see the harsh compression hardly what ... 2 megapixel Resolutionhin or her ...
THE PRACTICE COUNTS, NOT ANY TEST STRUCTURE IN THE LABORATORY!
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Thou shalt not swing but also record still images!
Antwort von MiXMaster:
And probably should be in the Picture synonymous move nothing else!
Have you ever rotated with HDV in the woods, if they move the leaves in the trees?
Sorry, but we are speaking of video, or of photography?
Antwort von deepcode:
So to say it this way too - IMO HDV is clearly a good thing, and HDV cameras save a higher Resolutionbzw. more image information s.als DV cameras. It should not be fought only with false expectations - HDV is not HD, nor is such as mini DV not Digi-Beta!
HDV is a consumer format with which you get - if you know how - very good, and better results can be compared with DV.
The major disappointment of many is certainly the fact that video - just because it dissolves more - not car looks BETTER, but still the look of a film is critical - light, depth of field conditions, camera work. Whoever wants to make movies is the same with an SD - Camera and if he has a clue of what he does, the film is to be funny - something more or less sharp plays absolutely no role.
And if I can not shoot with HDV 1000 sheets then I lay it flat. When I am with a 100,000 EUR 35mm ARRI make the famous horizontal rotation in the pine forest I get from the progressive tremor synonymous headache - so I let it be also better.
HC1, however, is a small example, a good thing, because properly handled so that you can get with your results under most conditions, such as with an XL2, and with minimum size and weight. And that's schonmal lot!
Antwort von grovel:
Sony's flagship HDV camera HVR-Z1E has only 1.07 megapixels, which corresponds to a Resolutionvon 990 x 1080 pixels. HDTV 1080 compared to the Resolutionalso is reduced by almost 50% synonymous, and in the small HD 720 mode is reduced Resolutionum about 23%, since only satisfied with 990 x 720 pixels can be used with 1280 x 720 pixels. So here is all but forgotten in the Rechnerei all that this camera takes interlaced stop!
I mean, a Resolutionvon 1440x1080i say yes actually a Resolutionvon 1440x540. This leads me to have 777,600 actual pixels, which dissolve the camera.
But this is only slight more than the Resolutioneiner DV camera, which in True16: 9 and non-interlaced receives, namely 1024x576 = 589,824 pixels. However, the picture is then compressed or vertically to 720 pixels and it has only 25 frames per second. On the other hand - if I was not wrong - it would indeed have a DV camera, which offers a 25p mode, a higher vertical Resolutionals an HDV camera in 25i mode have.
Or am I lying here all wrong and my professional Hardwarehalbwissen brings me to the wrong conclusions?
SeeYa grovel
Antwort von wolfgang:
720x576 50i, you should already be compared with 1440x1080 50i, and halving the HDV format nix da. In both cases, is recorded in interlaced fields, the fields are always 576 / 2 and 1080 / 2 lines.
But this is not the point. The point is that the material to the present HDV2 vision devices ala Plasma, LCD or projector must always be deinterlaced, which naturally reduzert the Resolutiondes material. So is 1080 50i is not really better than 720 25p.
Strictly speaking, a Halbbildaufzeichnung today would be an anachronism - in fact no longer necessary, if one had not unbedint the 1080 50i material ban on consumer mini-DV tapes ala want. I think it remains unchanged forecasting shame that we are apart of the JVC HD101 is still no real 720p camcorder in the upscale Prosumerbereich have. But perhaps that is still yes.
In any case, it would be good if the development would go to 1080 50p, or of me out to 720 50p. Whether we are working with DVC Pro HD, and to record on disks or chips, will be the next question.
However, it's just as synonymous: who wants to film high resolution earlier today in the consumer area already, which crops up s.den HDV camcorders do not really over. Or he will stop at mini-DV. But I can say only one thing: who has the distinction of these devices on a plasma to DV avi seen, even, who like me only takes the PD1 as a cross between HDV and DV-avi, which becomes clear how big the difference in quality simply is. Sure gibts limitations - the leaves example - and clearly you have to just deinterlace the 1080i high-quality material. But for the price of 1,500 euros to get the consumer area, but a very good device.
Comparison with the HC1 to an XL2 synonymous probably makes no real sense - these are very different devices. Rather, one can compare an HC1 with a 400 of Panasonic. If you want to compare the XL2, it was probably either with the XLH1 (as synonymous here) happens, or with the upcoming Pansonic HVX200. Or synonymous with the JVC HD101.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Rather, one can compare an HC1 with a 400 of Panasonic. No that does not work ..., they're very different sites ...
You have to HDV camcorder compare with other HDV camcorders and other DV camcorder with DV camcorders.
Antwort von inwa:
Thou shalt not swing but also record still images! Gneau which had wanted the video editors football broadcasts in HDTV (MPEG4 / 12 to 14 Mbit / sec)! The pans be blurred.
Antwort von inwa:
Pixel Shift: IMO there is a slight misalignment of the expense green - an additional canal brightness information (the color resolution produces).
This is the Beyer-sensor. With a chip with 3 mega pixels can you approximately 2 mega pixel rausbekommen while you would have otherwise only 1 megapixel. See:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer-Sensor
Pixel shift can be used only with cameras, since it basiet of multiple exposures. Here we'll explain:
http://www.digitalkamera.de/Info/News/03/13-de.htm
Antwort von inwa:
So here is all but forgotten in the Rechnerei all that this camera takes interlaced stop!
I mean, a Resolutionvon 1440x1080i say yes actually a Resolutionvon 1440x540. (...)
Or am I lying here all wrong and my professional Hardwarehalbwissen brings me to the wrong conclusions?
You need synonymous in interlaced mode 1440 x 1080 pixels. However, according to articles in photography (which is not always synonymous to read the right thing) is in interlaced mode two lines coupled Weden read. To conclude from this that the Resolutionnur would be 1440 x 540 but is wrong. The synonymous you can easily keep track of when you imagine that you are capturing from the tripod a Picture. Must come from somewhere, the 1080 lines, yes.
In interlaced mode can be made of 100 vertical pixels, about 65 lines are shown) (Kellfaktor, in progressive mode of Kellfaktor but less. 100 pixels from 85 - to 90 lines can be formed. The Resolutionist So therefore, 20 to 25% higher.
The Canon XL H1 has 1.56 million pixels, therefore the full 1440 x 1080 progressive fashion Resolutionund is synonymous in the 1080s of great resolution, but where is the interpolated picture of two fields. To that extent it is questionable whether there increases Resolutionsich.
Antwort von inwa:
But this is not the point. The point is that the material to the present HDV2 vision devices ala Plasma, LCD or projector must always be deinterlaced, which naturally reduzert the Resolutiondes material. So is 1080 50i is not really better than 720 25p. As written above, you can expect at 720p probably still around 20% on it. So instead of 0.9 we arrive at about 1.1 mega pixels. True 1080i but has 2.07 Mega pixels - then it was twice the resolution. She does, however, not noticeable, if not corresponding to the projection screen is great. For 16:9 TVs with 106 cm we have rarely seen the difference between good PAL and HD.
Strictly speaking, a Halbbildaufzeichnung today would be an anachronism - in fact no longer necessary, if one had not unbedint the 1080 50i material ban on consumer mini-DV tapes ala want. One would have to take synonymous 1080/25p. This has the same data volume as 1080/50i.
I think it remains unchanged forecasting shame that we are apart of the JVC HD101 is still no real 720p camcorder in the upscale Prosumerbereich have. But perhaps that is still yes. The Sonyand the Canon can be synonymous 720p. As far as I know even 720/50p. The JVC can only 25p. However, there will be virtually no difference between 25p and 50p.
In any case, it would be good if the development would go to 1080 50p, or of me out to 720 50p 1080/25p would have been great. Movies has 24p. The thick enough yet.
Antwort von Martin:
The point is that the material to the present HDV2 vision devices ala Plasma, LCD or projector must always be deinterlaced, which naturally reduzert the Resolutiondes material. So is 1080 50i is not really better than 720 25p.
This again is only half the truth - in fact it is worse. Sense of a video camera to record moving images. And here's the problem:
Moves in the picture has nothing to Camera full HDV resolution, synonymous in interlace mode. Logically, because changing the pixel of frame to frame in None manner.
Once the motion picture is halved, the area resolution (pixel count) in favor of temporal resolution () 50 instead of 25 frames per second. The lack Resolutionwird more or less well-calculated from the movement. Therefore, panning and motion blur will act as a still image, even at the shortest exposure times.
I would prefer a decent 720/50p a 1080/50i (1440x). Would be acceptable even synonymous 1080/25p.
Greeting
Martin
Antwort von Valentino:
Hi
So just the Progressivemodus the XL1H is far from being as good as a good software deinterlacer. Apart from that seen in the semi-professional HDV and most skilled craftsmen very critical. The reasons have been here several times already listed here, but for the average amateur is an FX1, or HC1 in the picture quality Quantensrpung in Comparison to the normal miniDV cameras up to ¬ 2000. Thus, the Profie is currently assessed by the computerized remain rather, because the risk of dropouts is still very high for HDV. I myself have an HC1 and I think they sell simply because the system is still too immature. A good XL2 is defined as the quality of still better, because there is little HD capable television and most still have a tube set at home.
Antwort von deepcode:
quite the academic discussion ..
But just make cool movies and take what is available and affordable!
Since HDV is quite ok, who wants something better may indeed spend per day 700 EUR for a F900.
Comparisons: Why should not an HC1 as compared with the XL2?
The XL2 looks pretty cool, is difficult and has interchangeable optics.
That was then synonymous already.
It is crucial under what conditions do what I can achieve results.
Zb under controlled lighting conditions, I am a little sharper with the HC1 and from her look hinbekommen similar images.
Under difficult conditions, the XL2 with its many parameters is (front pedestal, black levels, etc.) comes with no HC1 or FX1.
When guerrillas - Shooting with the HC1, I have the absolute space advantage, because it does not itch - introduce yourself with the XL2 to go somewhere that is after 1 minute and want to see someone there filming permit.
Sales, however, will be a fiasco if you with a winz - cam as the HC1 markups, no preference is how well.
Interlaced:'s just been the usual news and sport look, since i provides high motion resolution.
Deinterlace costs prnzipiell only Resolutionbei moving image parts. However, synonymous with progressive images cineshutter (1 / 50 or 1 / 48) are completely blurred. If, for example, when pivoting the camera or just moving the object. This motion blur is absolutely essential for a good motion playback, otherwise everything would end without jitter. The camera body, I will still be no difference between Fields and deinterlacing when I get the full resolution.
Antwort von wolfgang:
Moves in the picture has nothing to Camera full HDV resolution, synonymous in interlace mode. Logically, because changing the pixel of frame to frame in None manner.
Well not exactly. Two fields that are played in succession, look different, as a progressive frame. Can be seen, for instance, if one is a picture to be shown where each couplet a black and a white line. In full screen you can see the pattern in the half-image is blurred into a gray mass. That is a difference.
Antwort von deepcode:
who has a normal fotocamere times to make the following text:
Set belichtungszeit 1 / 50, NO blitz let someone pass by, mitschwenken, click.
guck you the picture - for my sake 6MPix great in - then take one copy of the picture, make downrez to about PAL resolution, and back again.
overlaying images in both flat and A make / B comparison.
Then you see that is very accurate - the very much higher Resolutionist "for the hare."
Is the camera still sees it, of course, quite different.
Antwort von wolfgang:
With a shutter speed of 1/50s and a moving object there will always be motion blur. But this is nothing new, and can probably only handle duch shortening the exposure time. But this occurs synonymous with professional on Kamers, and nothing is HDV-specific.
A 6 megapixel picture resize a picture to 0:47 megapixels, and that then hochzublasen again 6M - anyone really expected that we have here no viewable losses? As it should be any different?
Let's leave the church in the village any more than it is right to say that HDV would only SD resolution possession, any more than it would be fair to say that would have required deinterlacing of 1080 50i to progressive vision devices performing any loss of quality. The fact there is.
The viewable quality difference between 720p and 1080i are definitely relatively low. This is plenty of empirical studies. And that we can fully exploit a 50-inch plasma HDTV Resolutionauf not really, no news is synonymous. We consider only the pixel size of HDTV and HDV2 - and then think about whether the human eye at normal viewing distances in our living rooms still can not resolve the difference. It may be virtually impossible more.
But it will chase me out of every myth, he has just auserkohren for themselves as right ...
Antwort von inwa:
Moves in the picture has nothing to Camera full HDV resolution, synonymous in interlace mode. Logically, because changing the pixel of frame to frame in None manner.
Once the motion picture is halved, the area resolution (pixel count) in favor of temporal resolution () 50 instead of 25 frames per second. Also in the interlaced mode only 25 frames per second are recorded. But hang in 50 fields to be included in 1 / 50 second interval of each other.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeilensprungverfahren
When HDV is reduced on moving some of the sharpness that is encoded MPEG2.
Antwort von inwa:
The viewable quality difference between 720p and 1080i are definitely relatively low. This is plenty of empirical studies. Up to a TV Größ of 42 inches (106 cm diagonal) should be better than 1080i, according to investigations by the BBC and the Swedish tv 720p. Studies in the U.S. showed that with increasing display size more and more subjects the higher 1080i Resolutionals much better feel for a TV with screen size of 152 cm (Height 75 cm), this figure was 80% of the surveyed viewers.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
I do my own studies with a 37 "full HD panel in 1080i and 720p, and I the viewing distance (about 3m) does not change.
I can not clearly say whether one or the other is better. Because it is for me so I make my slide shows HDAV therefore currently at 720p because the MPEG2 files are then smaller.
Antwort von Marco:
"TV with a screen diagonal of 152 cm (Height 75 cm), this figure was 80% of the surveyed audience." That I have no doubt. But the fact that many people in such a display would make the living room, or even could. And the few who could were synonymous and that it would be synonymous nor can afford. ;)
Marco
Antwort von wolfgang:
Up to a TV Größ of 42 inches (106 cm diagonal) should be better than 1080i, according to investigations by the BBC and the Swedish tv 720p. Studies in the U.S. showed that with increasing display size more and more subjects the higher 1080i Resolutionals much better feel for a TV with screen size of 152 cm (Height 75 cm), this figure was 80% of the surveyed viewers. So, as I have the thing in his head, was up to 50 inch, 720 50p (not 25p) Material of test groups considered to be better, compared with 1080 50i. And that is exactly the point: more than 50 inches are expected in most living rooms, the plasma or LCD displays do not go, it would even be allowed devices often remain only 42 inches.
So what is the Jammerei that you necessarily would Resolutionbenötigen full HDTV? Where but even 720 50p to 1080 50i to the visual display units "wins", which will probably be long in the living room? Since I'm still skeptical - though in the long run will probably synonymous vision devices with full HD Resolutiondurchsetzen.
Antwort von domain:
So that's all I can not understand why Wolf's testimony. Extreme cases: If a table with 540 movies black lines, just in between white and the camera would create 1080-Resolutionwirklich it. Line 1,3,5, etc. would be in the first field so black, lines 2,4,6, etc., in the Second Halbild therefore white. So would the fields look quite strange, that would be completely black, the other only knows. Compounded by deinterlacing (PC) or played in quick succession (tube TV) and provided that the devices would be able to accurately display 1080 lines would be seen Certainly every time the line structure at 1080i just as in progressive mode. For still images, there is theoretically no difference in my opinion. For a given viewing distance, the picture would naturally appear gray in both cases, incidentally, exactly as if they had ever taken a gray area. In this case, the progressive frame, but synonymous, the two partial images in Interlaceverfahren would be gray.
Antwort von wolfgang:
Helmuth, there are test pictures to confirm this behavior. In a two interlaced images to blur into a gray mass. We had discussed this at some point - unfortunately, I have the link anymore.
A progressive camcorder, however, would Schwaren and white stripes represent each other clean.
Straight tube TVs with the Nachleuchtverhalten just would not be able to unravel the black and the white stripes - but appear as a gray area.
Too bad I did not see the link ...
Antwort von domain:
I believe you every word Wolfgang, but it does not on principle, but a possible effect in low Deinterlacingalgorithmen which produce may be a weichzeichnerartige vertical mixing of the even and odd lines.
LG Helmut
Antwort von inwa:
Helmuth, there are test pictures to confirm this behavior. In a two interlaced images to blur into a gray mass.
A progressive camcorder, however, would Schwaren and white stripes represent each other clean.
It is about the so-called Kellfaktor. Out of 100 lines can be interlaced with only 65 black and white lines are shown. In the full procedure is supposed to be 85 to 90. To that extent a theoretical advantage of resolution is expected 20%. Through good Nachberarbeitung, however, can achieve clarity benefits of up to 400%.
Even in the horizontal direction is the way with 100 pixels, and represented only 77 lines of black and white lines. The difference of 25p to 50p will be minimal. To that extent would eigendlich 1080p 25, the best format.
Antwort von mrjazz:
The difference of 25p to 50p will be minimal. The difference is huge. While in the typical 25fps film-look flicker when panning (what people like to imitate, them) deinterlace their recordings and take synonymous to loss of resolution in Purchase, has been with the typical ultra-fluid 50fps TV show appearance.
What is übrigends a major advantage of HDV to DV, synonymous if the end result "is only" on an SD-DVD, is the higher color resolution. DVD-compatible MPEG2 provides sharper colors because, as DV. That is, if you burn DV footage to a DVD, the potential benefits to DVD quality is not enough. And is stronger when keying or editing the whole much more problematic. The color resolution of HDV, however, you get out really good keying in Comparison to DV.
Antwort von Sputnik41182:
Do you do it all Professionally? or did you learn that? Yes it is scary how good you familiar with Resolutionund and and
Gruß Stefan
PS But, as I see it I need to buy me the new camcorder garkeine whether HDV DV DVD hard drive memory and anything else if I have read through the forum here and it will weaken all bitched just everywhere.
